Plasmoic

Plasmoic

Joined on Sep 20, 2010

Comments

Total: 16, showing: 1 – 16
On Adobe leaks 'Lightroom Mobile' app article (212 comments in total)

looking at comments, makes me think that they intentionally leaked the price, not the software...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 21, 2014 at 09:52 UTC as 5th comment | 1 reply
On Fujifilm teases upcoming SLR-style X system camera article (921 comments in total)

any hints whether it is weather sealed?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 21, 2014 at 09:50 UTC as 59th comment | 1 reply

looks like a government project aiming unemployment

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2013 at 05:34 UTC as 127th comment
On 10 Photo Editing Programs (that aren't Photoshop) article (353 comments in total)

add Ninja among the missing ones...wait its not supposed to be found anyway :)

Direct link | Posted on May 18, 2013 at 09:21 UTC as 114th comment
On Just posted: Nikon D5200 in-depth review article (233 comments in total)

This is from K-30'review :"K-30 still produces very good detail and makes up for it with arguably the best high ISO performance in its class "

and this is from 5200's:"At high ISO sensitivities, the noise performance of the D5200 is the best that we've seen from a DSLR at this price point."

as a potential buyer, I thiink that the vague point here is "class"...if it includes only the most recent cameras, then this class will consist of only 2-3 cameras...if on the other hand it includes a bit older ones too, then the above statements start to look confusing...
so which one?

Direct link | Posted on May 17, 2013 at 13:25 UTC as 25th comment | 4 replies
On Just Posted: Detailed hands-on Olympus PEN E-P5 preview article (315 comments in total)

same picture quality as with almost half priced E-Pl5?

Direct link | Posted on May 10, 2013 at 05:57 UTC as 75th comment | 4 replies

their sales used to somehow measure their innovative and supportive efforts, so reflecting the value of a software developer company more fairly, lets say...so by targeting a steadier cash flow stream, they try to avoid the reflection of those ups and downs in their developping abilities onto the cash generated..this can be seen as a hedge against their own business model, but the fee is paid by the customers..so the price includes both the product usage and the promise by the company to develop and excel their products and this exactly what makes its overpriced

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 16:05 UTC as 419th comment
On Accessory Review: Nimbus Cloud Dome article (105 comments in total)

Maybe its better to suggest some alternative uses, so we can help the reviewer:
1-Growing a plant
2-Washing veggies
3-
4-
.
.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 5, 2012 at 11:06 UTC as 34th comment

look nice...
any plans to make it available on mobile platforms?
(if it is give it to my poor searching skills:) )

Direct link | Posted on Sep 28, 2012 at 06:52 UTC as 239th comment
In reply to:

Photoman: Lovely system, but why is these images of the body and lenses so under exposed? Maybe they didn't calibrate their big bright moniter? Rookie mistake.

hope they are not taken with S2 :)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 07:54 UTC
In reply to:

Charrick: What a self-righteous douche. I don't mean the bride. I mean the photographer who responded. Many photographers are like minimalist "artists" - they expect to get tremendous money from very little work...and they often do.

As has already been stated, this person works only 4 months, or 1/3rd of a year, and makes $50,000 from that. My advice to Nikki is to get a job on the side, like for the majority of the year. In fact, you can call your photography job your job on the side.

Does she not realize that most people work 12 months a year and don't make that much?...me, included.

Her logic is like this: I only take Easter photos, and I only have about a week to do it. Thus, I must make $50,000 in one week. In one week, I can only manage to do 2 shoots (because of converting RAW files), so I must be paid $25,000 per shoot. That's absurd.

Also, she acts like he wouldn't have broadband internet, or own a car in normal life, since those "luxuries" are listed as work expenses.

exactly my thoughts...the photographer reasoning is far from being "perfect" as claimed...
get a job for those 8 months, rather than thinking how to spend that 7000 left after costs and live for another 240 days...
and afterall, if you let the equipment you claim is so expensive (and it is) to sleep for 8 months then yes it "surprisingly" will turn out to be expensive in your business model...
and if you do some other works during those 8 months, not including them into your revenue cost "analysis" is more than a dishonest attempt to posit facts in a biased but seemingly honest way...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 27, 2012 at 14:41 UTC

shouldn't the new button be near the other corner?
(if its intended for leftists, they should have built also a flash below that button)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 26, 2012 at 08:54 UTC as 37th comment | 1 reply
On Leica Announces V-Lux 3 superzoom article (131 comments in total)

...wonder if even this statement is a rebadged one (that Panasonic used for fz150:) )

Direct link | Posted on Dec 8, 2011 at 15:08 UTC as 61st comment
On Just Posted: Samsung NX200 Studio Comparison for JPEG article (108 comments in total)

at iso1600 not much different than P&Ss like LX5 or S95

Direct link | Posted on Nov 2, 2011 at 08:59 UTC as 19th comment | 1 reply

very fine thought and successfully executed.... ugliness

Direct link | Posted on Oct 12, 2011 at 18:12 UTC as 258th comment

daylight and low-lights comments identical?...or is it only a glitch

Direct link | Posted on Aug 17, 2011 at 06:05 UTC as 47th comment | 1 reply
Total: 16, showing: 1 – 16