Geeeez!! It is small compared to my DSLR, and the 4 to 6 plus lenses I would have to carry to cover its range. So that is not the question. The questions are quality of the images and, speed of the RAW [my S9100 was 10 seconds per shot in RAW], street price and handling, and HIGH ISO Shots quality along with other smaller questions.
If it passes these tests I may get one as my primary back u-p and carry around since it is sa SMALL by comparison.
Yes!!! Irealize it is larger than a micro with their limited quality and abilities but otherwise it is a great size and yes I would like a Micro camera [Shirt pocket size] for my wife and as a replacement for my F30. But this is a much more practical camera size.
Interesting! Seems to be a Very unfair review. am I missing something???
You compared a [US street price] $109 HP against a Epson $171 and a Canon [indicated the best] at $390.
Why not compare a cheap Canon against an expensive HP and Epson and see what happens then.