edu T

edu T

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Sep 8, 2011

Comments

Total: 148, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On Backstory of Phantom Flex4K video shot at 1,000 FPS article (91 comments in total)
In reply to:

yabokkie: hope we'll have 240p & 300p consumer video within a decade.

Well, dear yabokkie, if as you say mick232 is NOT confused, then you are living in the '90s indeed. But I see this exchange going on almost in real time, which in turn implies... Geez man I knew there must've been a reason today I woke up listening to Nirvana and L7! Help, where's my Sonic Youth laser disc...?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 15, 2013 at 18:02 UTC
On Backstory of Phantom Flex4K video shot at 1,000 FPS article (91 comments in total)
In reply to:

yabokkie: hope we'll have 240p & 300p consumer video within a decade.

But then, a13, he'd have written "this FPS,that i/p". Anyway, with the current time lag, he'll surely clarify it in less than 20 years from now.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 15, 2013 at 14:27 UTC
In reply to:

Kubicide: Nikon has every right to do this - so why the hate? Does everyone think the aftermarket folks really care about your camera or compatability, or bringing you some sort of "fair value"? No, they want your $$$. And as a manufacturer Nikon should do what they need to do to protect their product and support expenses.

No one knows for sure just how compatible or incompatible the aftermarket product is except for the engineers at Nikon and the other companies. This battery issue is just like the reverse engineered lenses. It's the old "buyer beware" thing. If you are out to save a buck then do it 'eyes wide open' and know that the aftermarket product may not work and the vendor just wants your money for their product. That's it. Nikon doesn't make any claim to state that their product is designed to work with anything coming out of any 'brand x' manufacturer.

Of course they have every right to do that AND their customer has every right to be informed about that BEFORE installing the new FW as well.
The latter was neglected, hence the "hate". (Have you ever been stabbed on the back by someone who supposedly had "every right" to do it?)

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2013 at 02:26 UTC
In reply to:

ScottnLaguna: Smart business practice. No more cheap Chinese batteries causing warranty issues. Fine with me.

If "Chinese batteries" are to blame, where are 99.99% of the OEM batteries from?
Surely from the North Pole, manufactured by elves and brought to you courtesy of flying reindeer...

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2013 at 01:54 UTC
On Swimming with the Nikon 1 AW1 article (193 comments in total)
In reply to:

MPA1: Why on earth does it capture sound on the video when underwater?! That is just annoying.

And you should have heard Beatles' Octopus's Garden!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 6, 2013 at 01:57 UTC
In reply to:

brecklundin: these sort of things are crutches for newbies and those who don't care to learn the craft of product shooting. You can do far better work with a couple inexpensive off camera flashes and some inexpensive foamcore board or just white craft paper.

These things are FINE if you want a sloppy shot for ebay I suppose (I honestly never noticed an increase in selling price with good photo's on ebay items. In fact I often suspected the opposite...people are fickle and thing Facebook quality photos are "good" photography.) And it's not bad for the price. However for a bit more cash and a few hours practice you can achieve far superior results even if using used flash units bought that a thrift shop (I have a number of those I bought for $5/ea & still use).

Google DIY product photography or visit a Flickr group "Creative Tabletop Photography". A useful group.

Last spend the cash to buy "Light: Science & Magic" by Fil Hunter. It's the best book for understanding lighting objects.

"These things are FINE if you want a sloppy shot for ebay I suppose..."
On the other hand, isn't a fair amount of sloppiness kind of reassuring when looking for used stuff?
I mean, it implies the photo is most probably of the actual item the seller is offering, rather than a photo from a promo brochure...

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2013 at 19:32 UTC
In reply to:

edu T: To foldio's creator: I can see you're using a 9V battery for the LEDs; this is a bit of a nuisance inasmuch you need to carry a thick battery besides and apart from the folded panels. (That is, if you don't forget the battery at home.)
So, hmm... what if you try to mount 3 lithium coin batteries side by side instead?
(e.g. CR2032: 3V, 240 mAh, 20mm D x 3.2mm H, 3 grams, about 50¢ ea. for 500 pc.)

OK, Juhaz and Foldio's creator: I'll settle for 6 AAA alkalines, inside a thin tubular holder running next to the LEDs.
BTW, do you know what you'll find inside if you pry open a 9V batt? Six AAAA cells connected in series, indeed...
IOW, 6xAAA will run longer than a single 9V "transistor battery", besides fitting inside the device!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2013 at 13:25 UTC
In reply to:

OnTheWeb: Looks pretty cool but, of course, needs to be larger.

This size is wonderful for watches and earrings. Nevertheless, rumor has that over the next few months we'll see sizes for wall clocks and necklaces, small trucks and furniture, yachts and refurbished space shuttles.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2013 at 02:52 UTC

To foldio's creator: I can see you're using a 9V battery for the LEDs; this is a bit of a nuisance inasmuch you need to carry a thick battery besides and apart from the folded panels. (That is, if you don't forget the battery at home.)
So, hmm... what if you try to mount 3 lithium coin batteries side by side instead?
(e.g. CR2032: 3V, 240 mAh, 20mm D x 3.2mm H, 3 grams, about 50¢ ea. for 500 pc.)

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2013 at 02:37 UTC as 15th comment | 3 replies
On Homemade rig captures extreme macro shots of snowflakes article (186 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: Great photographs!

Tiny sensors are the best for macro. People buying FF or even APS-C for macro are just clueless. m43 unfortunately is the smallest ILC format with native macro lenses, but sometimes manual focus etc is just fine, and then cameras with even smaller sensors should be used. Or simply P&S if the built-in lens is OK for macro.

If Pentax ever gets around to making a dedicated supersharp macro lens for Q, something like Q10 will suddenly start to make a lot of sense.

"Why are tiny sensors best for macro?"

Because the lenses they come with have relatively very short focal length, which is a real boost to your already critically shallow depth of field at short distances.

(An A650 zoom, for instance, has a "normal" angle of view at 11 mm; what matters here are the "real" mm, the ones marked on the lens barrel, not the "equivalent" FL.)

IOW, the relationship between sensor size and DoF is a case of correlation, not causation.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2013 at 02:08 UTC
On Homemade rig captures extreme macro shots of snowflakes article (186 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tony Ellis: I love these photos! - I have no idea how it is done? I get that it is a compact with a lens 'reversed' but not sure how it all gets put together... What is under all that tape? If anyone can post a link to a good site where it is explained I would be very grateful

Does it work with lenses that are not around the 50mm area?

The author himself cared to explain his well thought out optical contraption:
http://chaoticmind75.blogspot.ru/2013/08/my-technique-for-snowflakes-shooting.html

--and, not to be overlooked, the whole noise averaging process:
http://chaoticmind75.blogspot.ru/2013/08/about-averaging-identical-shots.html

If you are feeling "very grateful" now, then thank him... :)

Direct link | Posted on Dec 2, 2013 at 13:43 UTC
On Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup 2013 article (94 comments in total)

A 1"-type sensor is NOT, as mentioned, "slightly larger in size than that of an advanced point-and-shoot camera."
It has TWICE the area of a 2/3" sensor (fuji X20, XQ1) and 2.7x the area of the more common 1/1.7" (G16, LX7, XZ-2, etc.)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 30, 2013 at 12:00 UTC as 24th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

edu T: (what I'd like to know is) WHO's the soundtrack by...?
a nice juxtaposition of '70s-ish all-too-familiar elements --hence the integration with the cliche images-- but with the bonus of elaborate, haunting vocal harmonies (0'48").
thanks anyone!

Thanks, Rowel. Loved your painstakingly well done volley sequence, http://roelh.zenfolio.com/p1046028174/h5854a698#h5854a698 . (BTW it was a neat touch, setting the axes of most of the zooming in/out action on those off-center balls.)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2013 at 14:48 UTC
In reply to:

edu T: (what I'd like to know is) WHO's the soundtrack by...?
a nice juxtaposition of '70s-ish all-too-familiar elements --hence the integration with the cliche images-- but with the bonus of elaborate, haunting vocal harmonies (0'48").
thanks anyone!

Thanks, Laureen, I see you added the info to the copy.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2013 at 03:01 UTC

(what I'd like to know is) WHO's the soundtrack by...?
a nice juxtaposition of '70s-ish all-too-familiar elements --hence the integration with the cliche images-- but with the bonus of elaborate, haunting vocal harmonies (0'48").
thanks anyone!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2013 at 02:18 UTC as 12th comment | 3 replies
On Consumer SLR Camera Roundup 2013 article (112 comments in total)
In reply to:

qwertyasdf: If I were to recommend a Canon entry DSLR to a friend, without a doubt, it will be the 550D.

Good point, tkbslc: more than just seasonally planned obsolescence or gift freshness, there HAVE been effective improvements.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2013 at 01:15 UTC
On Consumer SLR Camera Roundup 2013 article (112 comments in total)
In reply to:

qwertyasdf: If I were to recommend a Canon entry DSLR to a friend, without a doubt, it will be the 550D.

I might even agree, except for a minor issue: the 550D/rebel T2i b is thrice removed from this Christmas twenty thirteen season.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 27, 2013 at 17:35 UTC
On Rare photos of Rolling Stones emerge from estate sale article (106 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hugo808: I got as far as number 7 before deciding that if I'd taken them they would have gone into the bin and never been seen by anyone!

Then you'd only waste a chance to have your shots appreciated 48 yrs later.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 17, 2013 at 15:52 UTC
On The Q Camera wants you to 'shut up and shoot' post (27 comments in total)
In reply to:

springsnow: You have to get a data plan yourself. So you have to spend $200, and pay more to your carrier for a data service that is just for this camera to work. Imo it's DOA. They should just do a wifi version for $100 and develop a smartphone app that the camera can pair with so people can use their existing data plans.

Should they? Then who would buy a low-end-phone-class camera only to pair it with a smartphone?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2013 at 12:06 UTC
In reply to:

JEROME NOLAS: To DPR staff- why don't you have photo-contests too?

Challenges are also kind of contest, you know, only that they tend to be held by what was described as "a bunch of artsy types that wouldn’t know acutance from aberrations"...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 15:31 UTC
Total: 148, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »