edu T

edu T

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Sep 8, 2011

Comments

Total: 119, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Anyone wanting to see more shots from that session? :-)
http://www.norwegianwood.org/beatles/english/abbey2.html

Direct link | Posted on Aug 8, 2014 at 22:59 UTC as 25th comment

Just a little question I believe no one's posed yet... what good would it be for Mr. Stater to have his (or the monkey's) photo deleted?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2014 at 04:16 UTC as 418th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Valentinian: "Copyright law states that works not originated by a human author can't support a copyright claim"
The picture originated in the owner's camera; also, because he owns the camera and the memory card he also own whatever is in it. Wikipedia doesn't own it.
'a work owing its form to the forces of nature and lacking human authorship is not registrable.'
But if he (presumably) edited the picture, then shouldn't his editing work be copyrightable?
Also if he allowed the monkey to take pictures (or didn't stop it by taking the camera rightaway from the monkey) then he "used" the monkey as an assistant photographer...
So the picture should be registrable.
Anyway, a monkey is not a "force of nature": it is a living inteligent being, capable of this kind of behaviour..

If the monkey in question is not a force of nature but rather "a living inteligent being, capable of this kind of behavior", then you're pointing out one more reason to deem him the *legitimate* copyright holder!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2014 at 04:07 UTC
On Ricoh expands Q series with Pentax Q-S1 article (362 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jim in Hudson: So what's the new button on the front for?

"but why is it not knurled?"
A hunch: if you have two dials on the same plane, one knurled and other not, chances are the latter is meant for an analog setting, say, manual focus.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 5, 2014 at 03:35 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (451 comments in total)
In reply to:

Elaka Farmor: How can RX100 (with its much smaller sensor and more megapixels) have better dynamic range and color depth, and a two years old olympus with a smaller sensor (E-PM2) have much better low light ISO??http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-PowerShot-G1-X-Mark-II-versus-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX100-II-versus-Olympus-PEN-E-PM2___941_896_840

Can it be said, in defense of Canon sensors, that "Rembrandt's pictures have a limited DR"? Come on, this was "shot" into the sun, yet shows lots of shadow detail...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/35/Red_vineyards.jpg

Direct link | Posted on Apr 17, 2014 at 13:25 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II real-world gallery article (132 comments in total)
In reply to:

Thematic: Agree with Mikael Risedal - even IMG_0043 has a blurry water color look to it. Very poor for the money.

Actually, it's pretty simple: everything above and beyond the rows of shoes, that is, the upper fourth of IMG_0043, was behind a display window. Blur & haloes explained?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 22:13 UTC
In reply to:

Frank_BR: "Interestingly, the company says both cameras will have Super 35 sensors (around 21 x 12mm), which is wider than the original Four Thirds sensor format "

The difference in the diagonal, which is what matters, is only 2.5mm.

The diagonal of the sensor matters because it's the required diameter of the image circle projected by the lens.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 18:32 UTC
In reply to:

rfsIII: The 23rd rule of journalism is "Never make your readers do math." Would you please provide imperial equivalents if you insist on showing off your pretentious familiarity with metric measurements. Please try to remember that DPReview started as an English website and it is the English who formalized the Imperial system.
And, in the future, please convert prices to proper English denominations: farthings, pence, crowns, and guineas.

It was my understanding that even English joined "the rest of" the world when formalizing the SI (meter, kilogram, second, ampere, kelvin, etc... everything nicely decimal).
It was.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 4, 2014 at 03:04 UTC
On Mockups emerge of new Olympus OM-D 'OM-G' article (334 comments in total)
In reply to:

edu T: To the non-believers:
Open your mind, don't give heed to the skeptics, let the hope in, and start saving now!
Case in point, when I first heard about a then-called "digital FM" I thought, "WTF, it's still October!" Should've known better... ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2CDWV6o1o4A )

Oh yeah, must be the same nice guy I bought a "digital back in 35mm-form-factor for film SLRs" from!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 2, 2014 at 16:59 UTC
On Mockups emerge of new Olympus OM-D 'OM-G' article (334 comments in total)

To the non-believers:
Open your mind, don't give heed to the skeptics, let the hope in, and start saving now!
Case in point, when I first heard about a then-called "digital FM" I thought, "WTF, it's still October!" Should've known better... ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2CDWV6o1o4A )

Direct link | Posted on Apr 2, 2014 at 02:20 UTC as 75th comment | 2 replies
On Mockups emerge of new Olympus OM-D 'OM-G' article (334 comments in total)
In reply to:

JPMontez: Very funny indeed! :-) As well as many of the comments down here. I just don't understand the lack of sense of humour some people demonstrate...

O M G !! That above was "The Revenge of the Britton" (aka "the where's series") part III... and counting!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 2, 2014 at 01:04 UTC
On Mockups emerge of new Olympus OM-D 'OM-G' article (334 comments in total)
In reply to:

crsantin: The ground glass focusing screen is what tipped it off, otherwise I would have believed this. I would buy this camera btw if it were real.

Not to mention that the mount lacks the two customary OM mechanical couplings (one for relaying the selected aperture to the metering circuitry, another to stop down the lens during exposure and DoF preview).

Direct link | Posted on Apr 1, 2014 at 23:14 UTC
On Mockups emerge of new Olympus OM-D 'OM-G' article (334 comments in total)
In reply to:

km25: If it is real. ISOs of 800! What is these the 21st century!

More astonishing yet, it's pretty easy to expose the ISO 400 and 800 "drop-in cartridges" in extended sensitivity mode, pushing them up to ISO 3200 or even above. (That is, if you don't mind, or perhaps you even want, blotchy grain and severely limited tonal range, of course.)
You only need to PP the files either through a specialized demosaic-er or a... hotter one!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 1, 2014 at 23:00 UTC
In reply to:

DaveS100: Hi all, I am new here and just updated my EM1 to the new firmware. But when I set 0sec anti-shock, the shutter still clicks at first curtain. If I set to 1/4 sec for example, it clearly clicks before and after the exposure, so it actually doesn't seem to be working. Has anyone tried it and actually gotten it to work? If so, how?

Thanks !

Consider that perhaps that's so by design. The spurious blur has been "usually" noticed in the 1/60-1/250 range, says the write-up. In fact, the harmful vibration in the wake of the "shock" lasts for a very few milliseconds, an interval irrelevant to a 250-millisecond (1/4") exposure.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 31, 2014 at 18:54 UTC
On Hungarian law bans photos taken without consent article (321 comments in total)
In reply to:

fuxicek: thats why all cameras now should have silent shutter sound and tilty flippy screen with touch screen shutter

until that day comes, there is also this very low-tech solution which has been around since film days...
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/614991-REG/Bower_VL152_VL152_52mm_Right_Angle.html

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2014 at 17:10 UTC
On Samsung NX mini First Impressions Review preview (566 comments in total)
In reply to:

Spectro: wow, that is thin. But with a lens attached it still not that pocketable. Maybe if they had a pancake lens.

Had you bothered to read the article before commenting you'd know they do have a 24mm-equiv f/3.5 pretty shallow pancake. (Pictured in "specifications" above.)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2014 at 02:21 UTC
On Nikon D3300 real-world samples gallery article (25 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mrrowe8: Great camera for a starter camera for someone moving outta point and shoot and great student starter camera ... Most of the images made by this camera will be only seen in a computer or 4x6-8x10 print size so no matter what it will serve the porpoise well .. As for the Nit pickers OMFG really , "blah blah blah touch outta focus" or "where are the landscapes ?" Stop that's not whose buying this and come to the conclusion if a gorgeous woman or man , what ever you taste is and you would still find fault .. Sweet Jesus

@Richard
Serving porpoises is illegal in most jurisdictions. Just serving us tuna fish or shark meat will do, thanks.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2014 at 23:47 UTC
On CP+ 2014: Things we found that had been cut in half article (107 comments in total)
In reply to:

BobORama: I want to know HOW they cut them in half. I've done this on a small scale for metallurgical specimen preparation. Same thing just bigger?

Now seriously: they were never cut in half, actually each half was taken from the production line to be showcased just BEFORE being joined with the other half during final assembly.
(Or do you believe there exists some cool alien tool called "water jet cutter"?)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 16, 2014 at 19:30 UTC
In reply to:

Dave Oddie: At F2.8 the lenses are not fast for the focal lengths they have so why not just stick a 19mm->50mm F2.8 zoom on and save the trouble if having three different cameras?

I am sure with zoom lens optical design being so good these days such a lens would offer excellent quality and they would sell a lot more cameras.

Yes they would, but that's an APS-C size sensor, thus a 19-50 zoom would really have to be waaaay dimmer than f/2.8 to be reasonably compact on a DP2. (As a coarse reference, think the typical 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 entry-level DSLR kit lens.)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2014 at 10:56 UTC

It's fascinating, how many approaches there can be to street photography. Compare Stanton's M.O. to the, say, "blitzy" style of Magnum's Bruce Gilden. Exact opposites, maybe?
(Gilden as seen by Eric Kim: erickimphotography.com/blog/2013/08/24/5-lessons-bruce-gilden-has-taught-me-about-street-photography ; Gilden himself in action: youtube.com/watch?v=IRBARi09je8 )

Direct link | Posted on Feb 9, 2014 at 15:34 UTC as 18th comment
Total: 119, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »