kemal erdogan

kemal erdogan

Joined on Jul 21, 2012

Comments

Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7
On 900MP portraits show human face in extreme detail news story (272 comments in total)

what a pointless exercise!

Besides, the same could be done by simply using an old school large format camera for exposure and then by scanning the film at high dpi without a robot arm and without torturing the models.

But, that would not make news for dpreview, I guess

K.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2014 at 14:17 UTC as 8th comment | 3 replies

I believe the name change marks that a full frame K-1 is on the corner

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 08:16 UTC as 13th comment | 1 reply

would have been a better article if it was only a collection of quotes from Klein. He is quite clear when he expressed himself, why try to translate what he says? I am sure most of us are able to get something to takeaway ourselves.

Direct link | Posted on May 2, 2013 at 08:41 UTC as 19th comment
On Just posted: Sony Alpha NEX-6 Review news story (330 comments in total)
In reply to:

psn: I would really love to see Sigma SD1 studio samples to compare with all these other cameras. Would have bought an SD1 if Sigma wasn't so stupid and greedy. Anyway, I still think the image quality of that sensor is the one to beat. Not Fuji, Olympus, Sony, or those other guys.

Damn it, Sigma, why do you have to suck! There are many more dumb@ss photographers like me out there. You can make money, just don't try to cheat us.

For now, I might get another NEX.

wow!, at base iso SD1 outresolves even D800

Direct link | Posted on Mar 26, 2013 at 10:49 UTC
On Just posted: Fujifilm X20 hands-on preview news story (127 comments in total)
In reply to:

kemal erdogan: The Fuji site says that the 12MP sensor use the same technology as XPRO1 and X100S.

it is likely that the sensor is exactly the same APS-C sensor used in the X100S.

I come to this conclusion by the fact the X20 supports all of 9/16, 2/3, 3/4, 1/1 aspect ratios, which implies that the sensor is at least as large as the diameter of the image circle both in height and width.

Least costly option to achieve this is just to use a bit bigger sensor and I think Fuji took that path. Lower pixel count is also consistent with that possibility.

And, I am thrilled at the possibility of having the low light capabilities of Xpro1 in such a small camera

yes, indeed. The difference is surface area is much bigger than the pixel count. sorry my bad

Direct link | Posted on Jan 11, 2013 at 21:10 UTC
On Just posted: Fujifilm X20 hands-on preview news story (127 comments in total)
In reply to:

kemal erdogan: The Fuji site says that the 12MP sensor use the same technology as XPRO1 and X100S.

it is likely that the sensor is exactly the same APS-C sensor used in the X100S.

I come to this conclusion by the fact the X20 supports all of 9/16, 2/3, 3/4, 1/1 aspect ratios, which implies that the sensor is at least as large as the diameter of the image circle both in height and width.

Least costly option to achieve this is just to use a bit bigger sensor and I think Fuji took that path. Lower pixel count is also consistent with that possibility.

And, I am thrilled at the possibility of having the low light capabilities of Xpro1 in such a small camera

OH, yes, I checked again the sensor sizes, 12MP vs 16MP warrants not that much difference in the surface area, the X20 pixel density must be higher but it is indeed possible to use a larger sensor on the front of a lens with a smaller image circle

Direct link | Posted on Jan 11, 2013 at 16:28 UTC
On Just posted: Fujifilm X20 hands-on preview news story (127 comments in total)

The Fuji site says that the 12MP sensor use the same technology as XPRO1 and X100S.

it is likely that the sensor is exactly the same APS-C sensor used in the X100S.

I come to this conclusion by the fact the X20 supports all of 9/16, 2/3, 3/4, 1/1 aspect ratios, which implies that the sensor is at least as large as the diameter of the image circle both in height and width.

Least costly option to achieve this is just to use a bit bigger sensor and I think Fuji took that path. Lower pixel count is also consistent with that possibility.

And, I am thrilled at the possibility of having the low light capabilities of Xpro1 in such a small camera

Direct link | Posted on Jan 11, 2013 at 14:28 UTC as 6th comment | 4 replies
Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7