cmykhk

When compared with high ISO raw, D600 is obviously better than 5D3, especially at very high ISO. 5D3 is just a machine which is just good at washing jpg details.

Kudos to Nikon.

DPReview has changed now. I am very disappointed at the biased 5D3 review. DPR lost their credit at all. I start reading DPR since 2007 and it has been my favourite photog site until 2012. D800 win in too many ways:

- much higher pixel
- equal ISO performance (when resized)
- world leading DR
- 1.2 / 1.5 crop
- support DX lenses
- faster shutter lag (0.042 vs 0.059)
- -2 EV focus points (all points!)
- EV focus up to +19 (5D3 only up to +18)
- focus up to f/8 (11 points)
- better body built
- more shutter count life (200K vs 150k)
- metal shutter room (5D3 is plastic)
- internal flash
- support wireless flash
- higher flash sync (1/250 vs 1/200)
- focus assist light
- timelapse video
- auto ISO based on lens mm
- USB 3.0
- priced lower

The last honest version DPR wrote is the 50D. Perhaps it is telling too true, as I commercial site, DPR no longer wants to make Canon angry, so that produced such a disappointing 5D3 review.

No longer trust DPR any more. Good bye and missed Phil