jadot

jadot

Lives in United Kingdom Surrey, United Kingdom
Works as a Photographer
Has a website at www.alexanderleaman.com
Joined on Aug 27, 2010

Comments

Total: 198, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

jadot: I'm not usually one to react to this kind of item (They come and go daily it seems), but this one seems to grate perhaps more than others.

Why is this?

Well, for a start, it feels like Kim is one of the prime examples of a recent breed of 'famous' internet gurus (to some) who is riding that fame to capitalise on his audience/followers. All very well, and I'm actually all for it - in some sense, photographers simply have to find new financial streams to keep their business cracking on.

But it really grinds my gears when every goddam photographer has to refer to HCB to authenticate either their own lazy photography or in this case a hipster neck strap. It's called 'Henri' FFS. You know; Henri Cartier-Bresson would use this and your photographs could be that much closer to this master.

It smacks of greedy exploitation of both HCB and Leica, and is potentially insulting to Eric Kim's followers' intellect and wallet in the process.

As someone said earlier - this s h i t has to stop.

and so is white.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2016 at 17:46 UTC
In reply to:

jadot: I'm not usually one to react to this kind of item (They come and go daily it seems), but this one seems to grate perhaps more than others.

Why is this?

Well, for a start, it feels like Kim is one of the prime examples of a recent breed of 'famous' internet gurus (to some) who is riding that fame to capitalise on his audience/followers. All very well, and I'm actually all for it - in some sense, photographers simply have to find new financial streams to keep their business cracking on.

But it really grinds my gears when every goddam photographer has to refer to HCB to authenticate either their own lazy photography or in this case a hipster neck strap. It's called 'Henri' FFS. You know; Henri Cartier-Bresson would use this and your photographs could be that much closer to this master.

It smacks of greedy exploitation of both HCB and Leica, and is potentially insulting to Eric Kim's followers' intellect and wallet in the process.

As someone said earlier - this s h i t has to stop.

It's widely reported in international journalistic opinion pieces that there is no clear cut case for the use of capitalisation to describe a person as black, or indeed white, at least grammatically speaking.

Getting hung up on this in a camera equipment internet forum where people quickly type in an opinion on the story is so far removed from the point that it's bizarre.

Referring to someone as a jerk (and using that word in a derogatorily way) simply because, it's assumed, he's from China, is conceptually wrong no matter how you choose to capitalise the name calling.

Your issue is with international journalistic opinion on correct grammar. Opinions differ, and there is no hard and fast rule about what is legitimately correct in this scenario.

Because there is no 'correct' per se, there is also opinion that neither can one or the other approach be incorrect.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2016 at 15:37 UTC
In reply to:

jadot: I'm not usually one to react to this kind of item (They come and go daily it seems), but this one seems to grate perhaps more than others.

Why is this?

Well, for a start, it feels like Kim is one of the prime examples of a recent breed of 'famous' internet gurus (to some) who is riding that fame to capitalise on his audience/followers. All very well, and I'm actually all for it - in some sense, photographers simply have to find new financial streams to keep their business cracking on.

But it really grinds my gears when every goddam photographer has to refer to HCB to authenticate either their own lazy photography or in this case a hipster neck strap. It's called 'Henri' FFS. You know; Henri Cartier-Bresson would use this and your photographs could be that much closer to this master.

It smacks of greedy exploitation of both HCB and Leica, and is potentially insulting to Eric Kim's followers' intellect and wallet in the process.

As someone said earlier - this s h i t has to stop.

so it's not alright to refer to a man as black with a lower case 'b' on an internet forum but it is ok to label all people from 'mainland china' as "jerks", and then describe that "he's probably from Korea anyway", because you know, they all look the same to me.

Tell me how this racism thing works again?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2016 at 14:11 UTC
In reply to:

jadot: I'm not usually one to react to this kind of item (They come and go daily it seems), but this one seems to grate perhaps more than others.

Why is this?

Well, for a start, it feels like Kim is one of the prime examples of a recent breed of 'famous' internet gurus (to some) who is riding that fame to capitalise on his audience/followers. All very well, and I'm actually all for it - in some sense, photographers simply have to find new financial streams to keep their business cracking on.

But it really grinds my gears when every goddam photographer has to refer to HCB to authenticate either their own lazy photography or in this case a hipster neck strap. It's called 'Henri' FFS. You know; Henri Cartier-Bresson would use this and your photographs could be that much closer to this master.

It smacks of greedy exploitation of both HCB and Leica, and is potentially insulting to Eric Kim's followers' intellect and wallet in the process.

As someone said earlier - this s h i t has to stop.

...or ignorance.

I was once mugged by a black man. I thought that was pretty rude, but it didn't make me wish to go and mug any black man that I could find, just so I could return the favour.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2016 at 13:58 UTC
In reply to:

jadot: I'm not usually one to react to this kind of item (They come and go daily it seems), but this one seems to grate perhaps more than others.

Why is this?

Well, for a start, it feels like Kim is one of the prime examples of a recent breed of 'famous' internet gurus (to some) who is riding that fame to capitalise on his audience/followers. All very well, and I'm actually all for it - in some sense, photographers simply have to find new financial streams to keep their business cracking on.

But it really grinds my gears when every goddam photographer has to refer to HCB to authenticate either their own lazy photography or in this case a hipster neck strap. It's called 'Henri' FFS. You know; Henri Cartier-Bresson would use this and your photographs could be that much closer to this master.

It smacks of greedy exploitation of both HCB and Leica, and is potentially insulting to Eric Kim's followers' intellect and wallet in the process.

As someone said earlier - this s h i t has to stop.

Read also:
I'm not racist - I have loads of black friends
or
I'm not homophobic, I have loads of gay friends (usually 1 acquaintance, but you get where I'm coming from)
or
I'm not racist, I just understand how the world works and that's how we talk on the street. Nobody else gets what racism is anyway. Not like me.

etc.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2016 at 13:51 UTC
In reply to:

jadot: I'm not usually one to react to this kind of item (They come and go daily it seems), but this one seems to grate perhaps more than others.

Why is this?

Well, for a start, it feels like Kim is one of the prime examples of a recent breed of 'famous' internet gurus (to some) who is riding that fame to capitalise on his audience/followers. All very well, and I'm actually all for it - in some sense, photographers simply have to find new financial streams to keep their business cracking on.

But it really grinds my gears when every goddam photographer has to refer to HCB to authenticate either their own lazy photography or in this case a hipster neck strap. It's called 'Henri' FFS. You know; Henri Cartier-Bresson would use this and your photographs could be that much closer to this master.

It smacks of greedy exploitation of both HCB and Leica, and is potentially insulting to Eric Kim's followers' intellect and wallet in the process.

As someone said earlier - this s h i t has to stop.

Most racists have also lived in the same place as they've always lived, often for longer than 16 years, but you go on ahead and justify...

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2016 at 13:49 UTC
In reply to:

jadot: I'm not usually one to react to this kind of item (They come and go daily it seems), but this one seems to grate perhaps more than others.

Why is this?

Well, for a start, it feels like Kim is one of the prime examples of a recent breed of 'famous' internet gurus (to some) who is riding that fame to capitalise on his audience/followers. All very well, and I'm actually all for it - in some sense, photographers simply have to find new financial streams to keep their business cracking on.

But it really grinds my gears when every goddam photographer has to refer to HCB to authenticate either their own lazy photography or in this case a hipster neck strap. It's called 'Henri' FFS. You know; Henri Cartier-Bresson would use this and your photographs could be that much closer to this master.

It smacks of greedy exploitation of both HCB and Leica, and is potentially insulting to Eric Kim's followers' intellect and wallet in the process.

As someone said earlier - this s h i t has to stop.

I have, thanks. Why? Have you? Does it matter?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2016 at 13:02 UTC
In reply to:

jadot: I'm not usually one to react to this kind of item (They come and go daily it seems), but this one seems to grate perhaps more than others.

Why is this?

Well, for a start, it feels like Kim is one of the prime examples of a recent breed of 'famous' internet gurus (to some) who is riding that fame to capitalise on his audience/followers. All very well, and I'm actually all for it - in some sense, photographers simply have to find new financial streams to keep their business cracking on.

But it really grinds my gears when every goddam photographer has to refer to HCB to authenticate either their own lazy photography or in this case a hipster neck strap. It's called 'Henri' FFS. You know; Henri Cartier-Bresson would use this and your photographs could be that much closer to this master.

It smacks of greedy exploitation of both HCB and Leica, and is potentially insulting to Eric Kim's followers' intellect and wallet in the process.

As someone said earlier - this s h i t has to stop.

Stealthy Ninja - a cornucopia of internet forum ironies right there, what with your casual racism, sweeping generalisations, your hidden internet identity and horrible toxicity, and your failing to see just how much of your post is apparently a mirror.

I particularly like the "Be a jerk and then pretend you don't mean it later" part. In equal parts condescending, deluded, bullish, and an almost perfect mission statement for your own internet persona - all at the same time.

This works on so many different levels - sadly it would seem that you only operate from a narrow and singular perspective.

Shame.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2016 at 10:58 UTC
In reply to:

jadot: I'm not usually one to react to this kind of item (They come and go daily it seems), but this one seems to grate perhaps more than others.

Why is this?

Well, for a start, it feels like Kim is one of the prime examples of a recent breed of 'famous' internet gurus (to some) who is riding that fame to capitalise on his audience/followers. All very well, and I'm actually all for it - in some sense, photographers simply have to find new financial streams to keep their business cracking on.

But it really grinds my gears when every goddam photographer has to refer to HCB to authenticate either their own lazy photography or in this case a hipster neck strap. It's called 'Henri' FFS. You know; Henri Cartier-Bresson would use this and your photographs could be that much closer to this master.

It smacks of greedy exploitation of both HCB and Leica, and is potentially insulting to Eric Kim's followers' intellect and wallet in the process.

As someone said earlier - this s h i t has to stop.

Stealthy Ninja - I think that's a little unfair - his success may be simply because he tapped in to an enthusiastic market earlier than most, and power to him for monetising and forging ahead.

The 'Henri' neck strap is a bit of a cynical and exploitative move in my opinion, and it annoys the hell out of me, but I'm guessing he's done a bit of research and discovered that there are idiots out there who will buy this.

He's just a mediocre photographer who has realised or thinks that he can make more money hawking this crap to people who think that quoting HCB or what your strap looks like makes you feel better about being a (not very good?) photographer.

I do think that Kim has miss-judged his target buyers here by a long way and it's probably going to blow up in his face, regrets all round.

But it doesn't necessarily make him 'jerk'. Perhaps he's simply a mediocre businessman too.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2016 at 10:22 UTC
In reply to:

jadot: I'm not usually one to react to this kind of item (They come and go daily it seems), but this one seems to grate perhaps more than others.

Why is this?

Well, for a start, it feels like Kim is one of the prime examples of a recent breed of 'famous' internet gurus (to some) who is riding that fame to capitalise on his audience/followers. All very well, and I'm actually all for it - in some sense, photographers simply have to find new financial streams to keep their business cracking on.

But it really grinds my gears when every goddam photographer has to refer to HCB to authenticate either their own lazy photography or in this case a hipster neck strap. It's called 'Henri' FFS. You know; Henri Cartier-Bresson would use this and your photographs could be that much closer to this master.

It smacks of greedy exploitation of both HCB and Leica, and is potentially insulting to Eric Kim's followers' intellect and wallet in the process.

As someone said earlier - this s h i t has to stop.

@veritalens - yes - am aware.

Leica aren't necessarily shining beacons of integrity either IMO, but that fact still doesn't make this story any less infuriating, right?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2016 at 16:16 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-Pro2 release moved to early March (68 comments in total)
In reply to:

LFPCPH: Will Fuji make it fullframe ???

No. You are missing a 'd'.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2016 at 14:51 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-Pro2 release moved to early March (68 comments in total)
In reply to:

LFPCPH: Will Fuji make it fullframe ???

It's a new expression to describe an old attitude. [ ;) ]

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2016 at 14:47 UTC

I'm not usually one to react to this kind of item (They come and go daily it seems), but this one seems to grate perhaps more than others.

Why is this?

Well, for a start, it feels like Kim is one of the prime examples of a recent breed of 'famous' internet gurus (to some) who is riding that fame to capitalise on his audience/followers. All very well, and I'm actually all for it - in some sense, photographers simply have to find new financial streams to keep their business cracking on.

But it really grinds my gears when every goddam photographer has to refer to HCB to authenticate either their own lazy photography or in this case a hipster neck strap. It's called 'Henri' FFS. You know; Henri Cartier-Bresson would use this and your photographs could be that much closer to this master.

It smacks of greedy exploitation of both HCB and Leica, and is potentially insulting to Eric Kim's followers' intellect and wallet in the process.

As someone said earlier - this s h i t has to stop.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2016 at 14:39 UTC as 62nd comment | 37 replies
On article Fujifilm X-Pro2 release moved to early March (68 comments in total)
In reply to:

LFPCPH: Will Fuji make it fullframe ???

I didn't think he/she was being serious. Just unnecessarily flippant.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 15:07 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-Pro2 release moved to early March (68 comments in total)
In reply to:

LFPCPH: Will Fuji make it fullframe ???

No. It's not really the point of the X cams anyway. It's unnecessary, expensive, will produce bigger cameras, & need massive investment in new lenses.

APSC *is* full frame to a lot of professionals, especially in my market, & there are even advantages to having a smaller sensor than the perceived 'Standard' 35mm format. Here are a couple that matter to me:
1/ Better AF coverage
2/ Smaller/Lighter systems and lenses
3/ Larger Depth of field on fast primes (More of subject in focus in low light with maximum aperture)
4/ Lower Cost (Nikon D500 to D750 notwithstanding!)

There is a huge professional market of people who just want cameras that perform, with good IQ, in a light(er) weight package, & at a reasonable price. Full frame cameras can produce excellent results in the IQ department, but in some ways can't compete in some other areas, & that's important for the kind of photography I do.

I sincerely hope Fuji don't dump everything they've achieved just to accommodate a larger sensor

Direct link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 10:32 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Nikon D5 (405 comments in total)
In reply to:

mschf: Nikon proves dinosaurs still exist.

keeping with your tired analogy it would be intelligent to remember that Dinosaurs existed on this planet successfully and in one form or another for approximately 165million years.
How long have humans managed to Rule the world by comparison?
One might suggest that the dinosaurs were in fact the more successful and triumphant species, no?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 13, 2016 at 10:20 UTC
On article Nikon's New D5 and D500 Push the Boundaries of DSLR (733 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boss of Sony: Unfortunately DSLRs are only really for pros nowadays. Nobody I know wants to lug around a dslr anymore. Even my friend who has been a full time pro photographer for 15 years has switched entirely to Fuji with the x-t1.

@halfwaythere - not every wedding photographer defines themselves or their client's expectations according to what camera(s) they are carrying. e.g I know weddings photographers that use DSLRs, ones that exclusively shoot Fuji, ones that shoot both, and individuals that take a Polaroid SX70 along for the ride.

One could argue that *Not* using whatever the heck you use to render someone's photographs in the best way that you see fit is actually being more elitist photographer and less 'client conscious' as you call it.

The point is; calling out one way of shooting over another or one camera system/brand over another is about as irrelevant as it gets for professionals as far as client satisfaction goes.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2016 at 09:42 UTC
On article Behind the Camera: A conversation with Peter Hurley (62 comments in total)
In reply to:

papa natas: Well, I'll get hell back here from the teeming millions on account of what I think, and by the way, I NEVER write OMHO.. I'm not humble.
1- It's stupid to ass-u-me that we ALL have converted to 4K. That goes to whomever had the brilliant idea to post this video in 4K.
2- This Hurley guy, of which I never seen his work, may have or be rough talent. Then, I cannot help but to reminisce the Old talent: those guys such as Hamilton, Adams, Leidmann, Clarke, Newton, and the list goes on, who were issued from the Plastic Arts & Visual Media environment; then came to discover photography with MANUAL cameras.
They had to LEARN the trade the good old way: to master composition, f stop and shutter speed with a narrow window of 36 shots. Nowadays it will be a capital sin not to get a dozen of decent images out of 500 shots. It's like shooting fish in a barrel, mind you.
For these guys Bokeh wasn't an artistic expression.

Wow.

Thanks for that, man. Really special.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 30, 2015 at 14:56 UTC
On article Behind the Camera: A conversation with Peter Hurley (62 comments in total)
In reply to:

papa natas: Well, I'll get hell back here from the teeming millions on account of what I think, and by the way, I NEVER write OMHO.. I'm not humble.
1- It's stupid to ass-u-me that we ALL have converted to 4K. That goes to whomever had the brilliant idea to post this video in 4K.
2- This Hurley guy, of which I never seen his work, may have or be rough talent. Then, I cannot help but to reminisce the Old talent: those guys such as Hamilton, Adams, Leidmann, Clarke, Newton, and the list goes on, who were issued from the Plastic Arts & Visual Media environment; then came to discover photography with MANUAL cameras.
They had to LEARN the trade the good old way: to master composition, f stop and shutter speed with a narrow window of 36 shots. Nowadays it will be a capital sin not to get a dozen of decent images out of 500 shots. It's like shooting fish in a barrel, mind you.
For these guys Bokeh wasn't an artistic expression.

You're what people might call a "hater".
But I suppose you already knew that, huh.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 30, 2015 at 14:36 UTC
In reply to:

henrikbengtsson: WTF - OSX 10.9.5 not supported.

WTF - You're running professional software in 2015/16 but not updating your operating system? (It's free)

Direct link | Posted on Dec 2, 2015 at 09:07 UTC
Total: 198, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »