Marcos Villaroman

Marcos Villaroman

Lives in United States San Jose, United States
Works as a Software Systems Engineer
Joined on Oct 31, 2003

Comments

Total: 44, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On High-end full frame roundup (2014) article (539 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zerg2905: Nikon did it. The 750 is their 5D III (and I mean it). But, 5D IV should come rather sooner, too.

The 5D IV better arrive sooner than later.

As it is, I don't see things in the sensor tech of recent Canon bodies to get excited about what maybe in store for Canon FF sensors. Lots of patents and rumors, but, nothing actually got released in years. Hopefully 2015 is the year Canon puts out their next gen sensor.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 8, 2014 at 21:45 UTC
In reply to:

Marcos Villaroman: Is this the same company/device that advertised Android compatibility during the Kickstarter and then backed away from Android support soon afterwards?

If so, this is not the kind of company I want to support, especially given the $150 price tag.

day2012: I am not talking just what models were working at KickStarter campaign. One would expect that the company support would go beyond what was the most recent Android phones at the time to a greater support of newer Android devices moving forward. That happened with iPhone and if you stuck with more recent iPhones, your investment worked out. Not so if you got an Android device. I didn't see any mention that they would not support Android moving forward during the KickStarter. I stand by my opinion: I won't support a company that backs off a major platform so quickly; I have no faith in such a company backing its products long term.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 1, 2014 at 05:58 UTC

Is this the same company/device that advertised Android compatibility during the Kickstarter and then backed away from Android support soon afterwards?

If so, this is not the kind of company I want to support, especially given the $150 price tag.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 30, 2014 at 05:19 UTC as 9th comment | 10 replies

*sigh* It took too long for this lens to come out. :(

If it was two years ago, I would have pre-ordered it in seconds. Now, I've invested heavily in mirrorless (Fuji-X in my case) and so feel less compelled to buy a 100-400 mk II.

I'm guessing I'll buy one in one to two years. I figure it'll be around that time I'll be interested in wildlife photography again. :)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 11, 2014 at 21:49 UTC as 24th comment
On A second glance: two takes on the Leica X article (386 comments in total)

Camera overrides the photographer on ISO and aperture settings, even in manual??? No thanks.

Plenty of other MILC systems out there to invest in.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 11, 2014 at 18:33 UTC as 10th comment
On Fujifilm updates X-mount lens roadmap to end of 2015 article (170 comments in total)
In reply to:

maxnimo: If I wait for an 18-600mm F1.4 OIS zoom, razor sharp wide open, am I being too picky?

Sounds more like you want an excuse to not buy any more lens. Might be a great way to control G.A.S.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 28, 2014 at 04:51 UTC
On Fujifilm updates X-mount lens roadmap to end of 2015 article (170 comments in total)
In reply to:

kwa_photo: I do love how Fuji is about as open and transparent as they can be to help their users make informed decisions. It enhances loyalty to the brand IMO.

The Fuji lens roadmap and their track record of cranking out lens on a regular basis are major reasons why I pulled the trigger on the X-T1, too.

It is sad that other companies don't announce their plans as visibly as FujiFilm does posting roadmaps on their website.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2014 at 17:35 UTC
On Fujifilm updates X-mount lens roadmap to end of 2015 article (170 comments in total)
In reply to:

lyricalmotion: as a sony E mount user.... Fuji lens lineup makes me jealous :(

The rumors that Sony will concentrate on F E-mount lens and not crank out any new E mount lens designs really turned me off. I'm coming from the FF DSLR camp and want small/light weight compromises. As good as the A7/A7R bodies are, fast FF mirrorless lens aren't small enough to be worth the cost of switching from FF DSLR.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2014 at 17:33 UTC

I wonder if Adobe is experiencing another security breach and more customer data is being exposed.

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2014 at 23:32 UTC as 71st comment | 2 replies
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2291 comments in total)
In reply to:

ZoranHR: Leica has joined a non-honest manufacture club along with Fuji's fake iso values.
Nicely polished or old fashion controls, who cares! "We got you on emotion" is the name of the game.

There is an appreciation to good old SLR's.
I prefer to know I'm just a number from the begining and then it feels like nobody's lying to you. Makes you feel good and not sorry for money.
That's just my thoughts. Cheers!

Technically Fuji isn't lying because they are taking advantage of how loosely camera ISO is defined and can be measured. But, if you aren't a tech geek, your ignorance of the different established methods of defining/measuring ISO might lead you to a bad assumption that Fuji's ISO measurements are similar to everyone else's.

As a Fuji fan, I really wish Fuji would explain their reasoning for doing this. The company has had great technical articles explaining so much of their engineering goals and designs up till now. The company products are really being aimed at more experienced photographers.

Direct link | Posted on May 4, 2014 at 03:51 UTC
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2291 comments in total)
In reply to:

Calvin Chann: An amazing amount of hate from people who would never buy Leica anyway, but wouldn't think twice about jumping on the hate Leica bandwagon. It's easy to run with the crowd.

So if you don't blindly love Leica, you are automatically a Leica hater? Too extreme of a label and looks like a cheap tactic to head off debate.

Nah. Let's have a debate on the relative worth of this camera and lens, and try to separate the technology and quality from the Leica brand. Let's also debate the Leica "Made In Germany" moniker, given the Leica factory in Portugal.

Direct link | Posted on May 4, 2014 at 03:47 UTC
On ThinkTank Streetwalker HardDrive Backpack Review article (69 comments in total)
In reply to:

munro harrap: I dont agree with the way it is packed here, when the DSLR should be at the bottom facing up with the lenses either side of whatever its got on. Having the centre of gravity low surely adds to its useability. That said, if its good enough for Gagne, its a win win all around!

Personally I never found it to be a problem to put the camera at the top. Overall the pack isn't that heavy that i really cared.

If I was going for a 40 to 60 lbs photo backback, I'd be heading for an F-Stop Gear backpack instead. I'd want sternum straps, adjustable load lifters on the shoulder straps, and a well padded waist belt --- features you don't find on photo backpacks intended for lower weight.

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2014 at 14:15 UTC
On ThinkTank Streetwalker HardDrive Backpack Review article (69 comments in total)

FWIW, I love the Streetwalker HD for similar reasons. It's not my bag for long day hikes --- I want the option to carry personal items and a water bladder for that sort of thing.

But, if you have to carry a decent amount of equipment (keep in mind the bag is relatively narrow) without bulging outer pockets and not resort to a rollerboard, this bag really works.

Another thing I like is that you can swap out the included waist belt for one of those utility belts that you hang photo-related pouches off of. I use my Think Tank Photo modular system to carry a water bottle and a lens or two that I want immediate access to without taking the backpack off.

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2014 at 14:10 UTC as 8th comment

No tweaks to WiFi capabilities?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 30, 2014 at 06:52 UTC as 22nd comment
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2291 comments in total)

All metal body, but, a plastic door to access the SD card and connectors. Darn. Would love it if it was all metal/glass.

As it is, I do wonder how well locking/unlocking the touch screen will be when operating this camera. I've always hated small cameras where it was too easy to accidentally touch a rear control and change settings.

It'll also be interesting to see how fast/accurate the AF is, especially in low light.

I wasn't a fan of the X-Vario because it seemed to be a bright light camera.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 00:41 UTC as 515th comment
On Fujifilm X-T1 Review preview (611 comments in total)
In reply to:

Andrew ATM216: I believe this review confirms the many other ones from those who have the camera and used it.

A few of the great features of this camera, which are important to me, are the awesome jpeg out of the camera, and the size and weight being smaller and lighter than a full frame dslr. And due to its smaller size, people dont get so intimidated when they see u taking their picture. Also, I hear that fuji produces superb lenses, which is a big plus as well...

I just hope that fuji somehow in their next release (the x pro 2) would fix the sync speed, so the camera would not b limited to 1/180....which I think it sucks....since u need to have a nd filter when shooting in bright daylight (if u want an f 2.8)....besides this issue, the xt1 looks to b an excellent lightweight camera delivering pro quality, at an affordable price. Thanks fuji.

When it comes to Fuji-X, I totally disagree that its JPEG "is like digital Polaroid". It's more likely on the Fuji-X that the OOC JPEG will be very usable, requiring very little tweaking. I resort to using the RAWs a lot less than with any other camera I own.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2014 at 16:41 UTC
In reply to:

Sixpm: Just wait for another year and the price will drop to $299 including lens..happened with the V1 and J1..does it not? I'm sure most of us here have enough gear to get us by for another 12 month at least…. :)

My thoughts as well. I didn't bight when for the V1 fire sale. I think I would go for a V3 and 70-300 firesale. In this way, Nikon has made progress.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 13, 2014 at 06:32 UTC
On Am I missing something here? article (623 comments in total)
In reply to:

sandy b: Richard as an editor is entitled to share his opinions, especially here. Interestingly he decided to pontificate his opinions at the same time as Nikon introduces a fairly important release for them. Kind of like a theatre critic ripping a new one as the curtain goes up. Kind of like dumping a bucket of blood among the sharks, getting the feeding frenzy going.

I disagree. This would be a major announcement if Nikon put more attention to the ergonomics for the enthusiasts and backed it up with enthusiast worthy lens announcements. The announcement leaves me scratching my head and Richard's first reaction article confirms I'm not the only one.

BTW, critics always rip a bad show when the curtain goes up. Plenty of bad broadway shows don't survive opening night.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 13, 2014 at 06:26 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3: a quick summary article (596 comments in total)

I look forward to picking up this kit when it is sold at firesale prices in a year or so.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 13, 2014 at 06:16 UTC as 222nd comment
On Fujfilm interview: 'The only way is to keep innovating' article (228 comments in total)
In reply to:

0MitchAG: I'd love M4/3 for light weight and a single lens Fuji X-Trans APS-C or Full Frame for performance. Alternatively, if they move into M4/3 once mirrorless becomes larger, it'll be all I ever need. They are a company I truly believe is shaping innovation for the years to come, and their honesty will get them quite far.

FWIW, I really do like how much more compact m43 lens can be, but, after evaluating the E-M1 and reflecting on the m43 gear I've bought in the past vs. the EOS-M and X100s, I decided that APS-C IQ improvements over m43 is significant enough that i'd rather invest heavily in Fuji-X glass than in m43.

I am personally glad that Fuji didn't waste resources pursuing a m43 strategy. Fuji has done a great job rolling out great lens in such a short period of time. That would not have happened if it went m43.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 15, 2014 at 19:29 UTC
Total: 44, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »