Glen Barrington

Glen Barrington

Lives in United States Springfield, IL, United States
Works as a Retired
Joined on Mar 21, 2003
About me:

I look good fat, I'm gonna look good old. . .

Comments

Total: 201, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Samsung launches rugged Galaxy S6 Active post (23 comments in total)
In reply to:

Glen Barrington: I hope the water seal for the charging and connection port is more rugged than the one on my S5, it wore out and broke off after about a year.

Not a big issue for me personally, but I could see that some people would be put out.

Wireless charging, eh? I think that's a good idea for this sort of phone. Though it isn't clear how one charges the phone in the car. Can the charging pad be powered by the 12V power supply found in cars?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 00:30 UTC
On Samsung launches rugged Galaxy S6 Active post (23 comments in total)
In reply to:

RichRMA: Ruggedized if it falls on its edge. One good hit directly on the screen and it's bye-bye.

Well if my S5 is any experience, I've dropped it face first onto concrete two or three times and haven't had any issues. To be fair, I do have one of those clear plastic screen protectors on the glass.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 00:25 UTC
On Samsung launches rugged Galaxy S6 Active post (23 comments in total)

I hope the water seal for the charging and connection port is more rugged than the one on my S5, it wore out and broke off after about a year.

Not a big issue for me personally, but I could see that some people would be put out.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 00:22 UTC as 7th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

Macro Nutrients: Oh im sure there is unlimited storage. Google definitely wants you to store your entire life, one photo at a time, on their servers. Yep, move along people, no spies here, just honest government workers....

Well, to be fair, it isn't as benign as merely looking at your photos. They do a deep analysis of them (That is what the auto categories are for) it allows them to better target the ads and offers they send to you. It IS a part of their monetization plan.

And THAT information about you becomes THEIR property which can be sold or traded away (or seized by the government).

Now it doesn't really matter that Google does this. They ALL do it. Why do you think Flickr has added auto categories as well? And Amazon and Microsoft offer cheap online storage? Google is merely reported to be the best at it, though no one really knows for sure. (No one talks about fight club, not anyone who know anything anyway).

Like I said in a previous post, we lost the war on privacy. This stuff is going to happen anyway. We need to make sure we get the best deal out of it.

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2015 at 14:19 UTC
In reply to:

Macro Nutrients: Oh im sure there is unlimited storage. Google definitely wants you to store your entire life, one photo at a time, on their servers. Yep, move along people, no spies here, just honest government workers....

We lost the war on privacy about the time that DARPANET became the Internet. Looking back, that was the inevitable, and probably, the only outcome of digital communications possible.

Now? We are negotiating the terms of surrender. Trying to get the best deal we can in exchange for our lives. In that light, this is a pretty good deal.

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2015 at 13:10 UTC
In reply to:

basale: submitting your pictures to this service means you say goodbye to your copyrights. Maybe this should have been mentioned in the original news item.

Have you read the TOS? Can you point out the passage or passages that document this? If you can't, then you're just some angry little man with an ax to grind.

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2015 at 13:05 UTC
In reply to:

ttran88: Who uses a DSLR, in that manner? DSLR are made for professionals and why would they shoot in live view. A real professional shots through the OVF and is willing to lie on the floor in the middle of church during a wedding. He/she is not afraid to get dirty or hurt to get the shot through the OVF. These EVF cameras are for play station loving people not PROs. Learn how to shoot properly people. Go attend a few workshops provided by Nikon or Canon. Bye

The subject of this documentary (and it MUST be true, they called it a documentary) already HAS that long arm, it is no longer possible to put a camera to his eye.

I, frankly, am shocked, SHOCKED at how litlle regard you show for the handicapped! You are nothing but an ARMIST!

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2015 at 09:48 UTC
In reply to:

tommy leong: just wait till Olympus produces a FF camera.....
We know they are aching to do one.
Just didn't have access to technology.
yet.

Never happens, I hope I like my E-M10

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2015 at 09:40 UTC
In reply to:

Peiasdf: This must be why Olympus abandoned the OM mount and Four Thirds system within a period of 10 years: they were hurting their users.

Like all corporations everywhere, they love their customers and only want the best for them!

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2015 at 09:39 UTC
In reply to:

Rouseabout: I could never be a real man if I used a crop sensor!

Apparently, it maketh him a Big Armed man!

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2015 at 03:03 UTC
In reply to:

Rouseabout: I could never be a real man if I used a crop sensor!

Yeah, but could you be a real man using a FF DSLR?

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2015 at 02:00 UTC
In reply to:

Lee Jay: This is what happens when you put marketing people together with legalized pot.

That combination is a bad thing, how?

Direct link | Posted on May 20, 2015 at 22:33 UTC
In reply to:

KonstantinosK: But, but... Does it offer a cure for DSL-Arm lengthening? Will my arm get short back to normal after I switch to Olympus? If not, this all is a fraud.

I'm sorry but surgery will be required, the damage has been done. Using DSLRs isn't the simple mild addiction that say, cigarettes are. I'm sure this is more of a warning to future users rather than a "Fix" for those who have been contaminated.

Direct link | Posted on May 20, 2015 at 22:32 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T10 First Impressions Review preview (504 comments in total)
In reply to:

Glen Barrington: I see it has a built in grip similar to that of the E-M10. Prospective users might want to consider they might need an optional external grip when using larger lenses. It seems a bit larger then the E-M10, so that might help a bit with balance.

In the Studio Comparison, compared it to my E-M10, since that is what I have, as well as the A6000 and the D5500, at a variety of ISO settings. In every location in the image and at all settings, I preferred the A6000 and the E-M10 versions to the X-T10, though the differences between the Fuji and the Oly were minimal. I suspect features would drive the decision between the Fuji and Oly rather than IQ.

However I preferred the XT10 to the D5500 most of the time. I was surprised at how little I liked the D5500 image overall. I thought I would like it best at least some of the time, and the E-m10 least some of the time, but that wasn't the case.

From what I've seen, so far, this seems to be a quality camera at an affordable price.

That's just it fevan, I don't think the difference in image quality is enough to use as anything but as a secondary decision point at best. I think features and other considerations will outweigh image quality for most people.

Direct link | Posted on May 19, 2015 at 15:52 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T10 First Impressions Review preview (504 comments in total)
In reply to:

Glen Barrington: I see it has a built in grip similar to that of the E-M10. Prospective users might want to consider they might need an optional external grip when using larger lenses. It seems a bit larger then the E-M10, so that might help a bit with balance.

In the Studio Comparison, compared it to my E-M10, since that is what I have, as well as the A6000 and the D5500, at a variety of ISO settings. In every location in the image and at all settings, I preferred the A6000 and the E-M10 versions to the X-T10, though the differences between the Fuji and the Oly were minimal. I suspect features would drive the decision between the Fuji and Oly rather than IQ.

However I preferred the XT10 to the D5500 most of the time. I was surprised at how little I liked the D5500 image overall. I thought I would like it best at least some of the time, and the E-m10 least some of the time, but that wasn't the case.

From what I've seen, so far, this seems to be a quality camera at an affordable price.

Well, What *I* prefer isn't all that important though I don't mind saying what I prefer. Clearly the A6000, is tops when it comes to Image quality. But not so much better, I think, that its IQ outweighs the convenience in size and weight of the E-M10.

But if I could afford it, I'd own the A6000, the E-M10, and the XT10. I think they'd all be a lot of fun to use. But practical considerations remain, so I think the E-M10 is best for me.

As near as I can tell, there is no time when I would prefer the D5500 over the others. I don't see much there to interest me.

Direct link | Posted on May 19, 2015 at 14:53 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T10 First Impressions Review preview (504 comments in total)

I see it has a built in grip similar to that of the E-M10. Prospective users might want to consider they might need an optional external grip when using larger lenses. It seems a bit larger then the E-M10, so that might help a bit with balance.

In the Studio Comparison, compared it to my E-M10, since that is what I have, as well as the A6000 and the D5500, at a variety of ISO settings. In every location in the image and at all settings, I preferred the A6000 and the E-M10 versions to the X-T10, though the differences between the Fuji and the Oly were minimal. I suspect features would drive the decision between the Fuji and Oly rather than IQ.

However I preferred the XT10 to the D5500 most of the time. I was surprised at how little I liked the D5500 image overall. I thought I would like it best at least some of the time, and the E-m10 least some of the time, but that wasn't the case.

From what I've seen, so far, this seems to be a quality camera at an affordable price.

Direct link | Posted on May 19, 2015 at 12:44 UTC as 57th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Bernard Carns: Oh come on now!

Everybody knows' this is just Apple's latest "feature."

:-)

The next software publisher that has software that crashes whenever a specific raw format is used is at risk of being sued by Apple! I'm pretty sure they invented that.

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2015 at 22:46 UTC
In reply to:

maxnimo: Why do they call it a 1" sensor when not even the diagonal is even close to 1" in length?

Marketing considerations. You not only want your product to 'sound better' than other options, you want a nice catchy description that adequately describes the 'feel' of the product. Accuracy of the name and subsequent description has nothing to do with it.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 20, 2015 at 12:48 UTC
In reply to:

Glen Barrington: Starting to smell like Kodak in here?

Well, Kodak's demise was a long slow slide into irrelevance. I don't think we can rule out the idea that Nikon is climbing that ladder . . .

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2015 at 12:18 UTC

Starting to smell like Kodak in here?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2015 at 11:32 UTC as 76th comment | 3 replies
Total: 201, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »