jaygeephoto

jaygeephoto

Joined on Sep 4, 2011

Comments

Total: 226, showing: 101 – 120
« First‹ Previous45678Next ›Last »
On article Zeiss announces 'no compromise' Otus 55mm F1.4 (488 comments in total)
In reply to:

CameraLabTester: One main reason why this lens could not be made as an AUTOFOCUS lens, as some have asked why, is the glass.

Just look at the cross section image showing the 12 elements.

No AUTOFOCUS motor ever built could move those ton of bricks fast enough.

2.14 Pounds (.970 Kilograms)

With great glass comes potentially great images.

.

Thanks T3 for being the voice of reason here; it usually takes an engineer to ground the discussion. I'm not sure if this lens would be a "fit" for autofocus. When using fast glass such as the 85 1.2 I find myself constantly turning it off so I can choose the exact area of selective focus. Great glass will be for now: large, heavy and expensive. This is the way things are until either the laws of physics change or there is a major breakthrough in materials/optical engineering.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 12:04 UTC
On Connect post Photosmith can keep photographers organized on the go (25 comments in total)

I hope they morph this pile of amateur app-junk to a Windows only platform: full of bugs and "convoluted" work-arounds, where it should feel right at home. Still waiting for Apple and Adobe to work out their differences (read: mutual juvenile peeing contest) and come out with something professional photographers and their clients would actually want to use.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2013 at 13:47 UTC as 1st comment

Does it add Multigrade/Polycontrast filtration to the image for contrast adjustment? Is that too technical? Why am I even asking such questions? Never mind. I'll go snort a line of powdered Dektol.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2013 at 14:10 UTC as 10th comment

Does Neiman Marcus have a camera counter? I'm just sayin'.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 21:48 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

webrunner5: Leica has just turned into a Whore as of late. They need to get a grip, no pun intended. What Goofball would pay for that.

Well, yes. I too kind of lost interest when I scrolled through the different "dedicated" case options and didn't see a red alligator one.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 21:46 UTC

Oh good. Thanks Nikon, you found my dad's army flashlight. When the switch is left in the standby mode the light will turn on instantly once the release button is pressed halfway on any Nikon camera. It uses a short range proprietary radio frequency to achieve this. Oh it doesn't?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 8, 2013 at 12:41 UTC as 3rd comment

The George Eastman House it's not.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 2, 2013 at 14:04 UTC as 13th comment
On article Ricoh announces 'HD' update to Pentax DA Limited primes (192 comments in total)
In reply to:

citizenlouie: These are the killers.... Very good move, Pentax. But what I don't understand is why Canon Red on Pentax lenses.... What happened to green?

Given Pentax's propensity towards garishly painted cameras I guess we should be thankful it's not tartan plaid or pink polka-dots.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2013 at 16:45 UTC
On article Ricoh announces 'HD' update to Pentax DA Limited primes (192 comments in total)

Not too sure many out there appreciate the relative optical simplicity and unmatched performance potential of single focal length/prime lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2013 at 14:23 UTC as 8th comment

I'm hoping that this is all a cruel hoax to get our collective ire up. If not, well, The Lion King is loosely based on Hamlet, but no one confuses the two. I hope.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2013 at 13:59 UTC as 9th comment
In reply to:

JerseyJohn: Ansel Adams wept

Seen the Ansel Adams color images as well as some stuff shot by Edward Weston. While both their B&W works are timeless and awe-inspiring, the color is competent but pretty much forgettable. To see Adam's work in a parallel media, check out his work "Singular Images" using Polaroid B&W.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2013 at 13:55 UTC

The Parthenon should be ready for that first coat of Weatherbeater™ or Benjamin Moore any time now. Will look worlds better than it does now. Hope Sanna is free to wield a brush.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 21, 2013 at 01:52 UTC as 20th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

califleftyb: I hate graffiti.

Spray paint on the Acropolis, highly skilled excrementation.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 21, 2013 at 01:49 UTC
In reply to:

seragram: sacrilege. LOL

Mr. Moonlight has his dates and terms wrong. Modern color films as we know them are known as integral tripacks. Kodachrome was introduced in 1935. It was originally intended as a commercial motion picture film but it never took off; the technicolor process was preferred due to it's ease of making copies. Kodak spooled the product into 35mm magazines and was a success among amateurs and professionals alike. Sheet and roll film sizes followed. Agfacolor (transparency film) was released a few years after. Kodachrome was a dye-additive process while Agfa used dye couplers. One only has to look at magazines from the 1950's and '60's to see just how much color photography was being done. As for myself, I still dream in Tri-X. Tonight I'm sure I'll have colorized nightmares.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 19, 2013 at 22:54 UTC
In reply to:

jaygeephoto: Photo Corruption. Old adage states, "just because you can doesn't mean you should." She's good at what she does but I wouldn't want these images to be disseminated into popular culture as the real thing; Laboratory created mutant abominations allowed to roam free in the wild.

The self immolated monk is just tasteless: Perhaps we don't need to see red blood on the floor in the photo of Bobby Kennedy's assassination to feel that it is any more real or horrible.

Restore and preserve our photographic past with respect and even reverence to great photographers. I think this is tacky exemplified.

Not negative, just offended and concerned about our photographic history. I'm not having fun or vilifying the person re-rendering these images - calling her an artist is a bit of a stretch however. I suppose if you want to paint your Aston Martin DB5 pink or purple it would speak volumes about your bad taste.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 19, 2013 at 14:30 UTC

Photo Corruption. Old adage states, "just because you can doesn't mean you should." She's good at what she does but I wouldn't want these images to be disseminated into popular culture as the real thing; Laboratory created mutant abominations allowed to roam free in the wild.

The self immolated monk is just tasteless: Perhaps we don't need to see red blood on the floor in the photo of Bobby Kennedy's assassination to feel that it is any more real or horrible.

Restore and preserve our photographic past with respect and even reverence to great photographers. I think this is tacky exemplified.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 19, 2013 at 13:03 UTC as 96th comment | 4 replies
On article Gorgeous color photos of America in the 1930's and 40's (109 comments in total)

It's nice any time that old photographs are brought out for viewing. There's nothing wrong with image restoration whether it's an old painting or photograph taken on film. Because of the technical limitations of the equipment and media methods and styles were much different than today - that's stating the obvious I know but based on some of the inane and nasty comment posted here it needs to be said. Time travel through photography is like no other.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 19, 2013 at 11:11 UTC as 17th comment
On article Gorgeous color photos of America in the 1930's and 40's (109 comments in total)
In reply to:

clicstudio: Gorgeous and amazing photos! They almost look recent.
Makes u realize the "real" photographers were those, 70 to 80 years ago, who shot manual and film and without an LCD screen to help and no photoshop.
I really admire them and the glimpse of Americana their photos show. Color makes the whole difference.
Thanx for sharing!

Do you send all your meals back at restaurants?
Yours maybe the single dumbest and snobbiest post I've read in months. Many magazines, most notably National Geographic, were reproducing color photographs via rotogravure (intaglio process) at the time that these photographs were taken. The 'masses' (just who the hell are the masses anyway?!), were able to look at these images for free at most public libraries. "Holy s**t, where's the the GD Tylenol?!"

Direct link | Posted on Aug 19, 2013 at 00:43 UTC
In reply to:

lightleak: That was disappointing, when I read „large sensor“ I was preparing for 6x7 digital :)

I guess the word "large" is highly relative and subjective term when it comes to sensors. But yes, a 6X7cm 200 megapixel would surely reign as the camera from hell. That would roughly translate into a 170 MB RAW file of 12,500 X10,000 pixels. Bring it!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 2, 2013 at 11:26 UTC
On article 17 signs that you were alive before digital photography (149 comments in total)

The category is, "Old Photographic Equipment". Bring on the Daily Double Jeopardy question!
Great stuff. I have two shelves above my computer work station devoted to what is (now) known as photographica (including the Speed Graphic in my avatar). I never owned that cool folding loupe but fashioned much more sophisticated looking dodging tools. There's a resurgence of film interest but a decreasing amount of knowledgeable people to pass on the techniques. This site is an indication of that in particular:
http://coolgirlsshootfilm.tumblr.com/

DK 50 1:1, LPD 4, Internegative, Bowens Illumitran, SX70, Polycontrast filters....holy s**t, where's the Tylenol?!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 2, 2013 at 10:37 UTC as 86th comment
Total: 226, showing: 101 – 120
« First‹ Previous45678Next ›Last »