brujo74

brujo74

Joined on Apr 19, 2012

Comments

Total: 32, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Pentax K-3 Review preview (483 comments in total)
In reply to:

paulski66: Well, on the plus side, at least we won't have to read any more posts from all the Pentax fanboys complaining "Where's the K-3 review?" every time DPReview posts a review of any other camera.

Nikon D4 doesn't need a review, paulski66 !

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2014 at 22:48 UTC
On Pentax K-3 Review preview (483 comments in total)
In reply to:

Danyel39: Hi I own a K-5 ( Silver ) and one month ago I received my K-3 ( Silver ).
I don't know what will be the future of APS-C but I'm unhappy with the results of the Image Quality Compared. Olympus is almost there, for my personal opinion D7100 is performing better and when compared to Sony 7R........
I photograph mainly during the night ( color rendition and low light capabilities are crucial ) and I'm starting to think that maybe time has come to sell everything and check both Nikon ( D4s, DF, D400 ? , ) and Sony 7R.
K-5 was my first camera and loved it but it seems to me the future is going into another directions. Image quality of Sony is unbeatable. low light capabilities of some nikons also. Don't know.
Can someone cast light on my considerations ?

Hi! I'm not very happy with Sony's IQ, let alone low-light performance. I've tested an Alpha65 some time ago and it was nowhere near my K-5 in both respects. I don't know about the new ones, haven't seen them with my own eyes. You can't go wrong with Nikon's D4s, but that's in another league (pricewise too). I think your best bet would be a Nikon D3s if you can get it for a good price.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2014 at 22:44 UTC
In reply to:

danijel973: I see no advantage of this method compared to registering your equipment on manufacturer's website for reference in case of theft.

True!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2013 at 18:22 UTC

this could prove wrong and have a major impact on their sales as many ppl buy canikons thinking of coutless solutions offered by the used (sh) gear market.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2013 at 18:19 UTC as 17th comment
On IMG_0899-ACR photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (6 comments in total)
In reply to:

RawDogg: Next time don't shoot it with the Exposure comp. set to -2.33 for a night shot.

I guess one could get the same picture in M mode keeping those aperture/shuttervalues, setting exposure comp to 0 and lowering the ISO to, let's say, 800. And with a lot less noise. Am I wrong?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 12, 2012 at 20:45 UTC
In reply to:

Andy Dufresne: - Big body for my big hands,
- Variety of prime lenses from wide angle to tele range.
- Min. APS-C size senzor
- long shutter life (100K+)
- Low noise at high iso
- Fast Autofocus
- Internal focus motor in the body
- HD video with full manual controls

Except for the first and last line you've described the Pentax K-5 :)

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 04:29 UTC
On DSC00116 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)

At last, a nice little camera!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 14:33 UTC as 3rd comment
On DSC00128 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Looks ok to me

Direct link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 14:32 UTC as 1st comment
On DSC00060 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

Hmm, impressive!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 14:20 UTC as 2nd comment
On DSC00040 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Pretty good hi-ISO behaviour!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 14:17 UTC as 1st comment
On Hasselblad responds to Lunar criticisms article (628 comments in total)
In reply to:

sephir: LOL http://i.imgur.com/2Dq4K.jpg

LOL http://i.imgur.com/iAxhL.jpg

@Shamael : considering your name, I should expect such reaction :/

Direct link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 12:25 UTC
In reply to:

topstuff: The amount of hate here is really bizarre. It reflects more on the people with such feelings of hate than it reflects on Leica.

Leica lenses are terrific. And I like the small form factor.

And I like the look of the pictures from a CCD sensor.

If Leica want to charge what they do, let them. You don't have to buy one.

By the same token, why buy an Audi when you can buy a VW? A small Golf and an Audi A3 , A4 have the same mechanicals. Why buy a nice watch? A Casio will do.

I don't hate Leica, i just hate their prices! I can understand paying a premium for their excellent glass, but not for their obsolete cameras. I fully agree with you on CCD sensors, the pictures look better.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 12:15 UTC
On Photokina 2012: Interview - Dirk Jasper of Nikon article (220 comments in total)
In reply to:

SheldonP: So why are we still unable to change the aperture in video mode with the D600? I thought our days of flipping to photo mode, changing our aperture, and flipping back to video were over with the D4 and D800, but this camera seems to have the same video aperture problem as previous models. What gives Nikon??

I'd say it would be easyer for Nikon to design some "video" lenses the oldfashion way, with an aperture ring and a chip to tell the camera the actual aperture value. Then they could just update the camera's firmware to make it work. Just a thought...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2012 at 20:09 UTC
On Photokina 2012: Interview - Dirk Jasper of Nikon article (220 comments in total)
In reply to:

cesaregal: What about Nikon lenses?
We need a Nikon 400 mm f/5.6.

No, I need a 400mm f/2 VRII to use it on my DX for a 600mm equiv.
:))

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2012 at 20:01 UTC
On Photokina 2012: Interview - Stephan Schulz of Leica article (221 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mdopp: I completely fail to understand why people call this a medium format camera. I used to shoot medium format myself - long ago on a Rollei 6008.
Classical medium format is 6x6. There are derivates (6x8 and 4x6) but 6x6 is what most people consider medium format. The frame size of 6x6 is more than four times larger compared to what we now call full frame (36x24) and you can clearly see that in the image quality.
But the Leica S-series is not 6x6. It is not 4x6 either - not even close.
They use a sensor size of 45x30, which is merely 50% larger than full frame (36x24).
Or to put it the other way around: Leica's sensor is roughly three times smaller than medium format (6x6).
I'd call this "full-frame plus", at most!
Obviously such a camera is in direct competition to full-frames like the Nikon D800 or the latest Canon offerings.

don't forget the Pentax 645D with it's 40MP, 44x33mm sensor and maybe a better price

Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2012 at 22:07 UTC
In reply to:

cjhwang: Just make sure you take some photography classes with this camera
Don't don't end up like a fool (watch below)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5IYahsPK2k

That's the spirit! That's a Leica man! cjhwang, you've made my day, thanks m8! This video reminds me of the strong selling points of using a Leica: "...getting deeply involved in the process of photography..." God, that guy was sooo deeply involved, he was even focusing there!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 19:34 UTC
In reply to:

nathanleebush: This company sure has chutzpah. Repackaging an ancient camera (replete with 230k screen) as a new one with a premium price while keeping a straight face takes some balls.

...and they're doing it like a favour to the photo community... Thanks a lot, Leica, we're in your debt!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 19:14 UTC
In reply to:

Phileas Fogg: If you DON'T LIKE Leica's then understand nobody is forcing you to buy one.

Sheesh this incessant bellyaching about what Leica does and how much their cameras cost is pathetic.

Most whiners here have never shot a Leica in their whiny little lives!

@PF : I only agree Leica is great on film cameras. But the digital Leica is so outdated (even from the time of their announcement) i wouldn't buy it for half the price. Again, I'm ok with the film Leica, they never get old
@Hugo808 : "in the right hands"!? I only got one right hand :( Then again, if you want to shoot old school you can use pretty much any modern DSLR: buy a split-screen focus replacement, switch to manual focus, shoot B/W, set the metering to "spot", select manual exposure, whatever else you want to make your life more painful. For the price of this particular Leica you can get a good FX DSLR and a decent lens. Bottom end, the only real advantage in buying Leica is it's diminutive size. And the red dot.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 19:07 UTC
On Hasselblad responds to Lunar criticisms article (628 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boerseuntjie: At around $6,000 this camera is a steal compared to the Leica Hermes at $50.000

lol, you're sooo right about that, i'll have 2 of 'em! I've had the time of my life reading this posts!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 14:06 UTC
On Hasselblad responds to Lunar criticisms article (628 comments in total)
In reply to:

sephir: LOL http://i.imgur.com/2Dq4K.jpg

LOL http://i.imgur.com/iAxhL.jpg

that pimped Nexus looks reel cool imo. But when i see those Leica and Hassy prices I can't stop thinking of the thousands of children starving to death each day across the world

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 13:33 UTC
Total: 32, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »