steelhead3: Capture 1 will be taking over the raw processor software (they need an improved catalogue) now that Adobe doesn't seem to care about photographers and have punted rather than invest in decent trial versions.
C1 will take over LR at around the same time* as Linux will take over Windows.
* when hell freezes over
5.6 or 6.3 ?
"Updated Tamron 18-200mm F3.5-5.6"
"The 18-200mm F3.5-6.3"
"Maximum aperture F3.5 - F5.6"
Igor Adamovic: I'm thinking of switching from Canon DSLR to mirrorless SONY too. I don't know what's stopping me, I don't need good ergonomic of Canon, I guess I'm too lazy.
Canon and erconomics in same sentence ?? Does not compute.
Finally Windows version is 64bit too.
Why is this tagged as "Camera news" ?
The Scurvy Dog of PR: Many of us no longer care what Adobe does.
@The ScurvyYet you make comment about Adobe...
Camera news ??
MarcLee: To the people whining about "the competition does not have this", or "the competition does not have that", get real. Unless you buy a high end camera, your camera does not have a bunch of functions that owners of a 1DX for example have. Sometimes not spending so much has a small disadvantage. Taking a stand against greed may involve a little sacrifice. It's this attitude that has made Adobe the monster it is. Let the suckers pay Adobe's overheads for less innovation. There is plenty of software out there to do MOST of what MOST people need. Support it and it will do more. Find out what you need. And buy it. I would like a 5D MK III to cost no more than my point and shoot. Guess what? It ain't going to happen.
No one if forcing you, it's YOUR choice.
Their business, their terms.
jpgs? really? why shoot raw and then convert to a not great format? covert to tiff, edit, then if you need to email the file convert to jpg.
@HowaboutRAWWhat size are your TIFFs ?
@GaryJPWe have a saying that the one asking is not stupid, it's the one who pays.
Every company prices their products as high as possible, it's the consumers task to decide if that price is right for them.
garyknrd: Who cares. I urge users to look elsewhere. I am, and have found support from others. I predict DXo and others to fill the gap extremely fast.
Does not matter if it's just him or million others, they don't know what others should do. I'm sure companies are calculating what kind of ROI they get staying with Adobe or switching to something else.
@chlamchowder Why ? Just bc YOU don't like Adobe ???
DPR, why was this posted as "Other news" and not as "Software news" ??
Archer66: RAW support seems to be limited at this point, no support for Sony A99, Nikon D600 or Canon 6D.
They need to update their RAW support page ASAP.
RAW support seems to be limited at this point, no support for Sony A99, Nikon D600 or Canon 6D.
tinpusher: I just want to them to ensure no more back focus issues with better QC.
Guess you will never buy a new camera then.
Anfernee Cheang: DPReview, will you fix the spec table which was copying NEX-3N? Some numbers just didn't look right... 2.7" 460K back LCD seems like a joke. And it doesn't look like it is fully articulated. Could you please also grab some information about the EVF resolution? Thank you.
Copy+paste should be banned in DPR office.
Hubertus Bigend: @Admin: Text says 30/1.4 comes for Nikon, Canon, Sigma; table says Four Thirds, Pentax, Sony, too, which is probably in error? (While I would be glad to hear otherwise, I think Sigma has completely stopped making Four Thirds lenses?)
Anyway, it's good to see Sigma come up with more and more quality stuff, and for the mirrorless systems, too. I don't care for their new metal casing, though. I found the plastic versions already to be nice and solid.
And I'm somewhat surprised at their introducing a 60/2.8 non-macro lens, after their latest DP camera came with a 50/2.8 macro which I would have expected to be offered seperately just like the 19mm and 30mm lenses used to be DP lenses in the first place...
Info for 30/1.4 is for the old version, typical DPR copy paste error.
photo nuts: Great review.
Decent camera. Not as light as one hopes for the SLT design, but acceptable.
Took a peek at Sony store for some lenses... Ewwwww... far too limited. Cannot compare to the m43 arsenal, much less Canikon range.
Good effort. Try harder next time Sony, especially your lens department.
Canikon might have more lenses but thats bc they have lenses with and without stabilization.
How many primes Canon has with IS ?