Fahd: Does the Shanghai cityscape have anything going for it? I've seen better snapshots!
Yea I don't understand this inclusion at all. Under-whelmed.
Not impressed with #11 or #5 either, but #8 is brilliant.
tecnoworld: Still no samsung nx300 in the image quality db. It's been out for almost 6 months now. And this om-d, with smaller sensor, is immediately in the database. Puah.
Maybe Olympus is making more of a marketing effort than Samsung?
I like the Epson R-D1.
It is probably the only digital camera ever to feature a film advance lever!
Acrill: " Overall, the X-M1's feature set and form factor places it squarely up against cameras like the Sony NEX-5R and Olympus PEN-EPL5."
The newer PEN cameras blow this one out of the water in terms of features. Its not even close.Touch interface is a massively important feature for a camera with this form factor, and the PENs, along with Panasonic GF and GX cameras do not skimp on other shooting features such as face detection, electronic levels and optional viewfinders.
"How about the picture quality?"
I was referring specifically to the features comment by DPReview.
The X-M1 image quality is bound to be great, but it is not competitive in terms of features.
" Overall, the X-M1's feature set and form factor places it squarely up against cameras like the Sony NEX-5R and Olympus PEN-EPL5."
Lee Jay: Still waiting to see my first good street photography image.
I agree with your general sentiment - most street photography I have looked at is not very appealing.
There are some of Trent Parke's images that I do really enjoy: http://www.magnumphotos.com/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult_VPage&ALID=29YL53ZJBIEZ&CT=Album
Two things here:
- Why mention a negative about the E-M5 and not about he other two cameras?
- Why not put the winner at the top of the page?
Disappointed in how DPReview handled this.
THe E-M5 without a doubt.
Yes, I do own one.
Jeff Seltzer: My 5DII is giving me a really worried look, "Please don't eBay me..."
I have questions about how the zoom lenses will cooperate with the hybrid viewfinder. Time will reveal all!
Plochmann: This is what makes Dprieview the worst forum; it is so big people go around trolling all the time. :( Now if you really care about how big the sensor is, go get a medium format camera! I have a full frame camera, it's called film! The depth of field was too shallow at times, and 4/3 standard is a great choice- not everything needs shallow depth of field. Also, focus distance changes depth of field, so if these two lenses focus really close then there, walla, shallow depth of field. If more super 16 like lenses would come out for this system, then 4/3 would be doing much better. I think ASPC is starting to look like the awkward middle child, with a 1.6 crop and bulky lenses too boot.
"So you did not or does not know how to change aperture to get deeper DOF." -------So you don't understand that changing aperture affects shutter speed?
Trevor G: My X10 works fine.
I can produce white disc images if I want to, but my photographic style does not normally include shooting into the sun, or against highly reflective surfaces, or long exposures at night.
I have 3500 properly exposed images which don't show any white discs. I have some inconcspicuous discs and minor blooming on other shots which in no way reduce my enjoyment of those images.
No one I have shown those images to (apart from some dpreview posters) has noticed anything untoward. It simply is not a problem in normal use, for me.
I have several dozen images which do show white discs or blooming in a major way because I specifically tried to get that effect.
While it might be a problem for some, it is not a problem for me. I look forward to Fuji's next, similar camera, which I will happily perchase as an "early adopter."
I knew about the white disc problem before I bought my X10 at the beginning of November, so I have no excuse to be disappointed. I'm not.
Big whoop, this thread is not about you.
I really quite like the Flickr interface. It offers a lot more control than Google Plus.