LincolnB

Lives in United States Kirkland, WA, United States
Joined on Sep 1, 2010

Comments

Total: 33, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

HappyVan: Does this D200 pic help you at all?

http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/7625069483/photos/3405425/tsaw-port-summer-dsc5063

You went through at least 6 years worth of photos and you cherry-picked a photo with obvious sensor dust spots and diffraction issues. [slow clap] Bravo, troll.

You should really learn how to get rid of those spots. A little more skill and attention to detail would help tremendously.

Your problem, other than being a foam-at-the-mouth troll, is that you are delusional about your ability and accomplishment. It's why you haven't progressed in 10 years.

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2016 at 17:56 UTC
On photo Crystal & Tut & Milo in the animal photo bombs challenge (16 comments in total)
In reply to:

HappyVan: Hmmm, 27th of 46th is appropriate. Keep trying. I noticed that you averaged 12th out of the last 10 challenges.

You are not that guy. In fact, you are an anonymous nobody troll. Fact.

I have professional photographers come to help assist in some of my photo shoots, so they can learn some of my techniques. You are quite literally not qualified to carry my bags.

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2016 at 22:07 UTC
On photo Crystal & Tut & Milo in the animal photo bombs challenge (16 comments in total)
In reply to:

HappyVan: Hmmm, 27th of 46th is appropriate. Keep trying. I noticed that you averaged 12th out of the last 10 challenges.

Clearly you don't know how to use white balance or how to do color-correction in post. But you do know all about cherry-picking, even though your photos don't give you much to pick from. You use all the classic tactics of a troll. Moving the goal posts is another favorite tactic of yours. And avoiding answering direct questions by deflecting and attacking.

You are a troll. You are trolling. That's what you do.

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2016 at 17:37 UTC
On photo Crystal & Tut & Milo in the animal photo bombs challenge (16 comments in total)
In reply to:

HappyVan: Hmmm, 27th of 46th is appropriate. Keep trying. I noticed that you averaged 12th out of the last 10 challenges.

You are a troll and that alone makes you a coward.

You troll because you can't cut it as a photographer; it's the only way you can get attention, even if it's only negative attention.

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2016 at 16:00 UTC
On photo Crystal & Tut & Milo in the animal photo bombs challenge (16 comments in total)
In reply to:

HappyVan: Hmmm, 27th of 46th is appropriate. Keep trying. I noticed that you averaged 12th out of the last 10 challenges.

Please be sure to enter those in a contest and let everyone know how you did, coward.

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2016 at 05:57 UTC
On photo Crystal & Tut & Milo in the animal photo bombs challenge (16 comments in total)
In reply to:

HappyVan: Hmmm, 27th of 46th is appropriate. Keep trying. I noticed that you averaged 12th out of the last 10 challenges.

You're a cherry-picking troll who couldn't take a decent photo with a $50,000 Hasselblad. You blamed M4/3 when the problem was YOU. You're the classic example of someone who thinks gear makes the photographer.

You troll DPR because you suck as a photographer.

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2016 at 00:35 UTC
On photo Crystal & Tut & Milo in the animal photo bombs challenge (16 comments in total)
In reply to:

HappyVan: Hmmm, 27th of 46th is appropriate. Keep trying. I noticed that you averaged 12th out of the last 10 challenges.

You're not an experienced photographer. You have the equivalent of one year of experience, repeated 12 times.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 23:10 UTC
On photo Crystal & Tut & Milo in the animal photo bombs challenge (16 comments in total)
In reply to:

HappyVan: Hmmm, 27th of 46th is appropriate. Keep trying. I noticed that you averaged 12th out of the last 10 challenges.

What makes you think you're qualified to comment on anything related to photography, anything at all? You're an absolutely terrible photographer with a pathological ego. The only reputation and accomplishment you have in the field is that of a well-known troll.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 23:06 UTC
On photo Crystal & Tut & Milo in the animal photo bombs challenge (16 comments in total)
In reply to:

HappyVan: Hmmm, 27th of 46th is appropriate. Keep trying. I noticed that you averaged 12th out of the last 10 challenges.

This image also got 18K "likes" on Instagram and I got paid $300 for it.

Volley.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 22:11 UTC
On photo Crystal & Tut & Milo in the animal photo bombs challenge (16 comments in total)
In reply to:

HappyVan: Hmmm, 27th of 46th is appropriate. Keep trying. I noticed that you averaged 12th out of the last 10 challenges.

As a do-nothing asshat troll with no skills you wouldn't know if that was good or bad.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2016 at 21:35 UTC
In reply to:

OBI656: Dpreview should hire the photographer of at least good quality. These test shots are a total misrepresentation of this lens of what this lens is capable of.

Many lens manufacturers hide their crap lenses by hiring great photographers, to draw attention away from the poor image quality.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 18:57 UTC
On article Otherworldly? Lomography introduces Jupiter 3+ lens (163 comments in total)

A 70-year old design from a country known for erratic quality, at a premium price. Oh, and now it's brass instead of aluminum so it's heavier. The minimum close-focus distance has been improved from horrible to awful.

Nope.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2016 at 19:50 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply
On article Ricoh teases spring 2016 full-frame Pentax DSLR debut (528 comments in total)
In reply to:

LincolnB: Is it possible to verify from the photo that it is still a K-mount?

Well I *assumed* so, but not having a K-mount camera myself I can't verify it. Are there any distinguishing contact points etc. that you recognize?

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2015 at 19:10 UTC
On article Ricoh teases spring 2016 full-frame Pentax DSLR debut (528 comments in total)

Is it possible to verify from the photo that it is still a K-mount?

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2015 at 18:21 UTC as 163rd comment | 6 replies

Focus stacking, awesome. That's a feature I predicted a while back.

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2015 at 01:40 UTC as 54th comment | 1 reply
On photo a7RII-RS-DSC09560-ISO_100 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (11 comments in total)

Nice detail. I can see the lead bird taking a crap.

Link | Posted on Aug 6, 2015 at 23:26 UTC as 5th comment | 4 replies
On SampleImage:9614658739 (11 comments in total)

Nice detail. I can see the lead bird taking a crap.

Posted on Aug 6, 2015 at 23:26 UTC as 5th comment | 4 replies
On a photo in the Sony Alpha 7R II Samples Gallery sample gallery (12 comments in total)

Nice detail. I can see the lead bird taking a crap.

Link | Posted on Aug 6, 2015 at 23:26 UTC as 5th comment | 5 replies

I'd like it if focus distance could be stored in EXIF. That would be a huge boon in forensic analysis, among other uses. It would help answer the question of "How far away WAS I when I took that shot?"

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2015 at 18:39 UTC as 64th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

RichRMA: Texas bill isn't draconian. That 15ft is designed to keep people out of the confrontations police are involved in. Does it sound safe being within 10ft of a fight between a cop and some drug-user, as an example?

The effective range of a pistol is 50-100 yards. The range of a cellphone camera is about 25 feet. Who do you REALLY think they're trying to prevent from getting "shot"?

My guess is that the police asked someone to propose this legislation and the reason had NOTHING to do with civilian safety. The police are clearly uncomfortable being filmed and it's not because they fear for their own physical safety or yours. The presence of a camera makes the situation LESS dangerous for the person doing the filming as it decreases the odds that their civil rights will be violated.

If the police can search my belongings, without a warrant, under the guise of protecting THEIR safety (aka a "Terry Stop") then I should be able to film them for MY safety.

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2015 at 16:54 UTC
Total: 33, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »