sbszine

sbszine

Lives in Australia Australia
Joined on Jun 5, 2012
About me:

Taker of casual travel snapshots. You can see some on Flickr at http://www.flickr.com/photos/sbszine/

Comments

Total: 34, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On E-PL3 Pen on a stand in the Pen Stands. challenge (4 comments in total)

Groan! :)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2014 at 23:43 UTC as 2nd comment
On 2014 Waterproof Camera Roundup article (225 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: What's with people demanding RAW on a camera with 16 million pixels on a tiny 1/2.3" sensor? Look at the pictures, they have noise (VISIBLE IN JPEG!) even at base ISO!
What do you expect from RAW, more encoded noise? Because JPEG at max quality already encodes 12 bit/pixel, and those tiny pixels don't have even 10 bits of information (as opposed to noise) in them!
Want to correct the picture - go ahead and correct the JPEG. Same thing. RAW is not going to turn these 16 mpix into 16 mpix from D4s!
Besides, except on Oly and Pentax at the very wide end, these pixels are way smaller than Airy disks, and even then Bayer-interpolated! Downscale 4:1 and stop fooling yourself.

I'd like RAW on these for contrast and colour, not noise and sharpness. Having an in-camera contrast setting would do.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 02:44 UTC
On Shockproof flagship: Olympus 'drops' new Tough TG-3 article (106 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: Shooting without RAW underwater is a very difficult thing to do.

The TG-2 had excellent auto WB underwater. RAW would be great, but you probably can get by without it with this cam.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 31, 2014 at 22:38 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M10 Review preview (317 comments in total)
In reply to:

itsastickup: No bokeh no buy.

You have to pay a bomb to get anywhere near the bokeh of an APS-C 35/1.8.

m4/3 is fine for many purposes, but without affordable bokeh it's off many of our radars.

That 25/1.2 should be a maximum $200.

Who are they kidding. Grow up, Olympus. Get some cojones and do what you know you have to do.

Just buy a 45 / 1.8, one of the cheap primes mentioned in the review.

You did read the review, right?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2014 at 23:02 UTC
On Chicago-based Calumet Photographic closes U.S. stores article (195 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: "Chapter 7 filing lists between $50-$100 million in assets and $10-$50 million in liabilities."

If assets exceed liabilities, why file for bankruptcy? Especially Chapter 7?

The assets are (in part) the stock & cash. If they rid of that then they may not have enough left to restock their stores & pay staff.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 14, 2014 at 05:40 UTC
In reply to:

Paul Guba: Great to see some more makers enter the market. Obviously they feel there is a profit to be made.

Sigma and Samyang's MFT lenses are cheap and have great IQ.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 18, 2014 at 07:28 UTC
In reply to:

Francis Carver: Wow, these will be like the 99th M4/3 lenses with these same focal lengths.

Manual single focal lenses like these must be dirt cheap to make -- which may explain why there are maybe 2 or 3 decent zoom lenses altogether for the Micro 4/3rd form factor.

The target market is Blackmagic portable CC users and GH3/GH4 users.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 18, 2014 at 07:24 UTC
In reply to:

Englishman in France: So the Olympus 25mm F1.8 costs £370 without lens hood or storage pouch and the Panasonic 25mm F1.4 costs £430 (amazon uk) with a lens hood and pouch. The price of the olympus lens hood is unknown, but their lens hood for the 45mm is £30. This is not the nifty fifty that the system needs. The price needs to drop.

The Oly 25 comes with a lens hood.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 30, 2014 at 02:55 UTC

I think the Sony A7 / A7r should be combined into one entry, as they are basically the same camera. (Not a partisan thing -- I voted for the E-M1 myself).

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2013 at 22:12 UTC as 73rd comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

itsastickup: Camera sales plunging, not too bright a future considering mobile phones and tablets, no product diversity.

And now defecating on their customers.

Time to abandon ship.

But which ship to go to? Canon has no DR. Sony has poor bokeh in their zooms and mediocre lenses generally. Pentax is boutique. Olympus has no bokeh unless you go well off-piste. Fuji has a rather limited lens selection. Who have I forgotten?

Come on Canon, get some decent DR in to those cameras.

Olympus doesn't have bokeh? Try their 45mm and 75mm primes and report back with your findings.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2013 at 04:25 UTC
In reply to:

Kubicide: Nikon has every right to do this - so why the hate? Does everyone think the aftermarket folks really care about your camera or compatability, or bringing you some sort of "fair value"? No, they want your $$$. And as a manufacturer Nikon should do what they need to do to protect their product and support expenses.

No one knows for sure just how compatible or incompatible the aftermarket product is except for the engineers at Nikon and the other companies. This battery issue is just like the reverse engineered lenses. It's the old "buyer beware" thing. If you are out to save a buck then do it 'eyes wide open' and know that the aftermarket product may not work and the vendor just wants your money for their product. That's it. Nikon doesn't make any claim to state that their product is designed to work with anything coming out of any 'brand x' manufacturer.

On the heels of the Sigma lens incompatibilities it seems less likely to be a coincidence.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2013 at 04:23 UTC
In reply to:

jhinkey: Why do I have to lug a 580g lens around to get a 20mm FX equivalent FOV on my m43 lens? It had better be stellar wide open on m43. Plus it won't take filters.

AND - they use 6 aperture blades which makes ugly sun stars in my opinion.

There's a fast wide zoom on Oly's lens roadmap, maybe wait for that.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 08:38 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Review preview (559 comments in total)
In reply to:

toto435: GM1 seems to have better sharpness ?! isn't it the same sensor on both ?

Or a weaker AA filter?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2013 at 22:35 UTC
On Olympus Stylus 1 Preview preview (324 comments in total)
In reply to:

Anfy: They managed to put a flash on the EVF "hump": why it was not possible on the E-M5/E-M1 really I do not know.

The EVF hump on the E-M5 contains the IBIS gadgetry apparently.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 06:03 UTC
In reply to:

Jogger: Prob $1000 going by the other "Leica" lenses for m43.

Yabokkie, you do know that 25mm is different to 50mm, right? It might have the equivalent FOV on a crop sensor, but it's still a 25mm lens.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2013 at 02:55 UTC
On Panasonic DMC-GM1 preview (639 comments in total)
In reply to:

HB 101: Also, can you spell Sony RX100 killer?

I think the GM1 is really going to shine with a pancake prime like the 20 / 1.7 as its lens. The RX100 is probably a better bet for zoom fans who don't want to change lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 22:39 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 samples gallery updated article (73 comments in total)
In reply to:

lazy lightning: Good Lord Almighty, I declare! They be askin' a huge stack 'o greenbacks for these here Micro 4/3 cameras and lenses!

I love m4/3 stuff, but, yup, they certainly are!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 10, 2013 at 22:58 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 samples gallery updated article (73 comments in total)
In reply to:

ijustloveshooting: biggest problem of this format is dof..even at 40mm f1.7 dof is so so, a little shallower than 1/1.7 compacts...apsc is way to go...

If you shoot some m4/3, you'll quickly see DoF isn't an issue in practice. You can still take a portrait with just an eye in focus if that's what floats your boat. I actually wish it had a bit more DoF so I wouldn't have to stop down as much for portraits and macro.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 10, 2013 at 22:58 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review preview (2142 comments in total)
In reply to:

rxbot: Just found out raw files are 12 bit not 14. I had assumed a $1400 without lens camera would be 14 bit. If you want a 14 bit weather sealed APS-C body buy a D7100 or K5iis. Cheaper too.

Where did you see that it's 12 bit? The specs I've seen say 14 bit.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 13, 2013 at 04:09 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review preview (2142 comments in total)
In reply to:

eviskz0r: Quite frustrating that almost every review on the web doesnt give a clear idea at how AF works with 4/3 lenses. Being a 300 f2.8 4/3 zuiko owner, should I expect from the EM1 an upgrade or a downgrade from E5 in terms of S-AF and C-AF?

According to this review (if you read the whole thing) a slight downgrade.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 06:03 UTC
Total: 34, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »