Mike99999

Meh.

There's a 50mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8 and 85mm f/1.4. What else do you need?

Nope, you are wrong. There are no small APS-C lenses, therefore MFT will always win.

Try putting *any* tele lens on an APS-C mirrorless. It's nonsense.

FF bodies were the perfect balance with...

I like the idea, but not from Canon.

The sensor is terrible, a lousy 1.6x crop and there are no EF-S primes for this thing.

Canon will never commit to EF-S glass.

People upgrading from point-and-shoot always look at size first.

Canon also doesn't use a proper APS-C sensor. The Canon is 1.6x crop, Olympus is 1.9x crop. Big deal.

A Nikon version of this would be nice though combined with a 35mm f/1.8.

You don't seem to know what you're talking about.

12mm f/2, 17mm f/1.8, 20mm f/1.7 produce more OOF bokeh than any equivalent lens you can put on an APS-C Nikon or Canon. Canon APS-C is terrible....

Meh.

What planet are you on? The images out of the Fuji look worse than any recent APS-C Nikon.

For me Nikon did the very affordable D7100, the affordable yet stunning 85mm f/1.8, the 70-200 f/4 VR, etc...

Those lenses might not be flashy, but they are a hell of a lot sharper than those Fuji...

To me the Fuji X-series is a case of the emperors new clothes. They basically take a Nikon D3100 or a Canon t2i, put it inside a shinier body, and sell it as if it's the greatest new thing. It is a...

The DX zoom range is covered perfectly:
Tokina 11-16 f/2.8
Nikon 17-55 f/2.8
Tokina 50-135 f/2.8
Nikon 70-200 f/4

The primes are lacking in the 16-24mm range, but 35-50-85mm is covered...

The D600 is a s*** camera compared to this. The AF points on a D600 are a joke. Also, the prices of the lenses you need to buy to benefit from FF are astronomical. If not you get soft corners and...

DX is the cleverer system. FX only exists because of egos like you who think bigger = better. Had Nikon and Canon not wasted their efforts on catering to those egos, we would have had f/2 DX zooms...

DX is the cleverer system. FX only exists because of egos like you who think bigger = better. Had Nikon and Canon not wasted their efforts on catering to those egos, we would have had f/2 DX zooms...

Diffraction limits are the same, no matter how good your lenses are. Can't defy the laws of physics.

There's no way Nikon would do that. Why would Nikon support a competing system?

Ken Rockwell is an idiot.

?????

35mm f/1.8 - $200
50mm f/1.8 - $200
85mm f/1.8 - $400