Mike99999

If you are ok with f/5.6 zooms, you should just pick up a Sony RX-100.

This lens is crazy slow.

Primes are the way to go for mirrorless systems: Olympus 12mm f/2 is the wide angle of choice.

The 16-50 is a miserable lens. This lens cannot compare to a Nikon 17-55 or 24-70. Not at all.

The 50-135, however, is excellent.

Considering that all these lenses are made by Tokina, it is...

The 16-50 is miserable. I've owned it, it's not a good lens.

Never buy the latest & greatest camera bodies, from any brand.

I paid $250 for my PEN E-P2 after the E-P3 came out. The camera works just fine with good IQ.

Nikon is dumping perfectly awesome D90...

Recently, there was a statistic published that showed that 99% of the top shots by photojournalists were shot on f/2.8 zooms.

A f/1.4 prime on micro four thirds will do the same or better than a...

Meh.

There's a 50mm f/1.8, 50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8 and 85mm f/1.4. What else do you need?

Nope, you are wrong. There are no small APS-C lenses, therefore MFT will always win.

Try putting *any* tele lens on an APS-C mirrorless. It's nonsense.

FF bodies were the perfect balance with...

I like the idea, but not from Canon.

The sensor is terrible, a lousy 1.6x crop and there are no EF-S primes for this thing.

Canon will never commit to EF-S glass.

People upgrading from point-and-shoot always look at size first.

Canon also doesn't use a proper APS-C sensor. The Canon is 1.6x crop, Olympus is 1.9x crop. Big deal.

A Nikon version of this would be nice though combined with a 35mm f/1.8.

You don't seem to know what you're talking about.

12mm f/2, 17mm f/1.8, 20mm f/1.7 produce more OOF bokeh than any equivalent lens you can put on an APS-C Nikon or Canon. Canon APS-C is terrible....

Meh.

What planet are you on? The images out of the Fuji look worse than any recent APS-C Nikon.

For me Nikon did the very affordable D7100, the affordable yet stunning 85mm f/1.8, the 70-200 f/4 VR, etc...

Those lenses might not be flashy, but they are a hell of a lot sharper than those Fuji...

To me the Fuji X-series is a case of the emperors new clothes. They basically take a Nikon D3100 or a Canon t2i, put it inside a shinier body, and sell it as if it's the greatest new thing. It is a...

The DX zoom range is covered perfectly:
Tokina 11-16 f/2.8
Nikon 17-55 f/2.8
Tokina 50-135 f/2.8
Nikon 70-200 f/4

The primes are lacking in the 16-24mm range, but 35-50-85mm is covered...

The D600 is a s*** camera compared to this. The AF points on a D600 are a joke. Also, the prices of the lenses you need to buy to benefit from FF are astronomical. If not you get soft corners and...