Think perhaps Samsung assumes everyone knows it is upgrade of EX1, and therefore sizes, discussion of 20% more light, etc. are in reference to the EX1? Do they assume we know it is the same size, body of the EX1?
I am guessing they rushed the announcement to get it out before RX100 actually hits the streets.
Due to it's many advantages, I am considering cancelling my RX100 order which I finally placed 3 hours before the Samsung announcement was made.
I hope pre-reviews and samples and actual size get on the web as pronto as RX100 so I can determine if IQ is GOOD ENOUGH for me, and I can then use big flash, external mics, moving LCD, ND filter.
Also, I saw a comment about a solution to get threads for add on stuff, presumably a 2x telephoto, getting up to 160mm would be nice, especially with the bright lens to start with.
Elliott
Direct link |
Posted on Jul 4, 2012 at 14:43:11 UTC
Madam Newman,
nice pics.
please change your camera to higher quality settings:
resolution, highest is 2400 x 1800, you are only using 1280 x 960.
quality: change it to JPEG 'fine'
#3, master curmudgeon.
InTheMist: That's actually pretty impressive. RAW?
Think perhaps Samsung assumes everyone knows it is upgrade of EX1, and therefore sizes, discussion of 20% more light, etc. are in reference to the EX1? Do they assume we know it is the same size, body of the EX1?
I am guessing they rushed the announcement to get it out before RX100 actually hits the streets.
Due to it's many advantages, I am considering cancelling my RX100 order which I finally placed 3 hours before the Samsung announcement was made.
I hope pre-reviews and samples and actual size get on the web as pronto as RX100 so I can determine if IQ is GOOD ENOUGH for me, and I can then use big flash, external mics, moving LCD, ND filter.
Also, I saw a comment about a solution to get threads for add on stuff, presumably a 2x telephoto, getting up to 160mm would be nice, especially with the bright lens to start with.
Elliott