Howard

Howard

Lives in United States The Nation's Capital, United States
Has a website at www.travelerathome.com
Joined on Jun 16, 2002

Comments

Total: 55, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On article Hands-on with the Sony RX10 III (302 comments in total)
In reply to:

Greg VdB: Since it's an RX10 II with a longer lens, not replacing it, surely the logical name would have been RX10 II XL...
(leaving room for a future version with an even longer lens, the RX10 II XXL, and so on)

Sony is not a T-shirt shop.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 13:31 UTC
On article Canon announces budget-friendly EOS Rebel T6 (1300D) (931 comments in total)
In reply to:

BarnET: hey Canon why do you settle for this
This is after all your new Eos T6

18 megapixels isn't the best stuff
Why not 24 just to show some love?

Even the video is looking poor
While you guys used to own that floor

Canon please Can't you see?
This looks older then a CRT TV

well i have something to confess
I am off to Sony at least they impress

life is too short to waste time and wait.
So off to E-mount which is looking great.

Excellent! This alone justifies this lame release.

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2016 at 00:29 UTC
On article Canon announces budget-friendly EOS Rebel T6 (1300D) (931 comments in total)

Whip cream on leftover, not a smart move circa 2016.

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2016 at 21:13 UTC as 95th comment
On article Canon announces budget-friendly EOS Rebel T6 (1300D) (931 comments in total)
In reply to:

Howard: Really? Canon? Why?

Please do not lecture me on economics, I actually have a Ph.D. in Econ. But that's not the point. Point is that it's cheaper to just sell the T5(i) without having to changing the manufacturing process. At this point releasing a 18MP cam is like putting whip cream on leftover ; it's hurting Canon's reputation more than it generates revenue.

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2016 at 21:12 UTC
On article Canon announces budget-friendly EOS Rebel T6 (1300D) (931 comments in total)

Really? Canon? Why?

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2016 at 18:13 UTC as 107th comment | 8 replies
On article CP+ 2016: Hands-on with new Sigma SD cameras and lenses (305 comments in total)

This thing is big!

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2016 at 21:02 UTC as 39th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

veritalens: Sigma is obsessed with trying to lock people into their lens/body ecosystem, needlessly. Shame.

@veritalens: I re-read your two-sentence post, and it is still ridiculous.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 17:03 UTC

I applaud Sigma's constantly pushing the boundary, although I don't currently own any Sigma equipment, it's good to know that they are keeping up the competition.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 16:16 UTC as 44th comment
In reply to:

veritalens: Sigma is obsessed with trying to lock people into their lens/body ecosystem, needlessly. Shame.

Ridiculous comment. Being largely a third party lens manufacturer, Sigma only would wish it's lenses can be mounted to any system. The opposite is true.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2016 at 16:14 UTC

I think this is a good refresh of the xxD line. With the bumped-up resolution and better AF, it should pair really well with lenses like the 100-400 II to offer a capable wildlife/action kit. I personally don't care much for 4K video, but it is a little that it does not offer it in this day and age.

Now the $1199 question is: will the DR hold up to the competition? ;-)

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 04:21 UTC as 71st comment | 5 replies
On article In Fine Detail: Canon EOS 5DS / 5DS R In-Depth Review (716 comments in total)

Wow, this is a pretty underwhelming review (and justifiably so).

Link | Posted on Dec 19, 2015 at 05:02 UTC as 96th comment

I don't know who's more bored -- the women in the picture or me.

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2015 at 15:15 UTC as 34th comment

I will never buy another Motorola phone after having 2 droid phones. I still shudder when I think about them.

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2015 at 14:14 UTC as 3rd comment
On article Beyond the table top: 5 mini tripods reviewed (191 comments in total)

How does a tripod without QR plate even work? Do you twist the camera to mount it? That sounds awkward.

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2015 at 14:31 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Howard: What does this one have that the Sony A6000 doesn't?

I can list quite a few things the A6000 has and this one doesn't, and it's cheaper too.

There was an EBay deal of $500 for the A6000 kit with the 16-50 lens. But that's not even my point; my point is that the A6000 is 1.5 years old, and probably will be replaced with an even better one soon, yet it has EVF, better sensor, etc., how's this Canon going to compete?

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2015 at 14:05 UTC

What does this one have that the Sony A6000 doesn't?

I can list quite a few things the A6000 has and this one doesn't, and it's cheaper too.

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2015 at 12:18 UTC as 37th comment | 6 replies

Canon: pay attention!

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2015 at 19:47 UTC as 16th comment

Well, I hope they make it shock proof as well, as I can imagine that many will curse it and throw it on the ground when they can't take the picture they want.

What an utterly stupid "feature"!

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2015 at 17:43 UTC as 49th comment
On article The big beast: hands on with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 (1296 comments in total)

Honest question:
What is the advantage of this camera over the Sony A6000?

Link | Posted on Jul 17, 2015 at 19:20 UTC as 97th comment | 10 replies
On article Opinion: Did Sony just do the impossible? (1085 comments in total)

Now I know what the Canon "See Impossible" campaign was about -- they saw a Sony at the end of the tunnel :-)

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2015 at 15:54 UTC as 92nd comment
Total: 55, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »