nemark

nemark

Lives in Serbia Serbia
Joined on Jan 13, 2009

Comments

Total: 114, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Great, but it is just one more Samyang announcement. We already have two unrealized Samyang announcements of one lens: 2.8/10mm. It was firs announced at the las Photokina, and again at the end of 2013. With both releasing dates way behind us.

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2014 at 11:11 UTC as 39th comment | 2 replies
On Challenge:8495 (6 comments in total)

What is BW in the title? Obviously not "black and white", as shots must be "Full colours only..."

Posted on Mar 18, 2014 at 19:28 UTC as 6th comment
On article CP+ 2014: Hands-on with Sigma DP2 Quattro (249 comments in total)

Quattro means - you need 4 (four) hands to use it!

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2014 at 15:26 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

nemark: I still don`t understand why Canon uses 2496 x 3120 as a 5:4 maximum ratio image size, instead of 3900 x 3120 px, what uses most af a sensor?
They do it always when their camera has 5:4 as option of image size!
Unbelievable!

Still I don`t understand. This was the practice for all previous compact cameras. I can shoot full resolution of the sensor (3:4=4160x3120px for MkII) and later crop it to 3900x3120px in some editing software, but camera can`t do it for me as it does for other aspect ratios? I don`t understand it!

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2014 at 19:31 UTC

Removing OVF instead of implementation of an quality EVF?
Definitely not my camera! No matter of other qualities.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2014 at 21:30 UTC as 10th comment

I still don`t understand why Canon uses 2496 x 3120 as a 5:4 maximum ratio image size, instead of 3900 x 3120 px, what uses most af a sensor?
They do it always when their camera has 5:4 as option of image size!
Unbelievable!

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2014 at 21:29 UTC as 11th comment | 2 replies
On photo P1250100 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (6 comments in total)
In reply to:

nemark: Which one is this lens??? Something is wrong here (and it happens from time to time).
43mm and f1.6? Never heard of one. Tailored EXIF data?
And great for 25mm if that is it at 1.8.

Leica calls it 42.5mm, not 43mm ;)
I expect 42.5mm in EXIF data... If Nocticron, highly recommended!

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2014 at 08:20 UTC
On a photo in the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Review samples sample gallery (6 comments in total)
In reply to:

nemark: Which one is this lens??? Something is wrong here (and it happens from time to time).
43mm and f1.6? Never heard of one. Tailored EXIF data?
And great for 25mm if that is it at 1.8.

Leica calls it 42.5mm, not 43mm ;)
I expect 42.5mm in EXIF data... If Nocticron, highly recommended!

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2014 at 08:20 UTC
On a photo in the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Review samples sample gallery (6 comments in total)

Which one is this lens??? Something is wrong here (and it happens from time to time).
43mm and f1.6? Never heard of one. Tailored EXIF data?
And great for 25mm if that is it at 1.8.

Link | Posted on Jan 29, 2014 at 20:43 UTC as 3rd comment | 3 replies
On photo P1250100 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (6 comments in total)

Which one is this lens??? Something is wrong here (and it happens from time to time).
43mm and f1.6? Never heard of one. Tailored EXIF data?
And great for 25mm if that is it at 1.8.

Link | Posted on Jan 29, 2014 at 20:43 UTC as 3rd comment | 3 replies
On Challenge:9152 (25 comments in total)

I agree. Many are not even close to a silhouette (most of them), some are negatives, and some are not flowers at all, but flower turned to seed.

Posted on Jan 20, 2014 at 20:24 UTC as 13th comment

I would like it with removable lens hood, just like on 8mm fish-eye.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2014 at 19:12 UTC as 10th comment

"I don`t own it, I don`t want it, I didn`t have it."
For both lenses.

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2014 at 18:46 UTC as 8th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

trulandphoto: This might just be my next EOS-M lens. But do I get EF mount so I can use it with my 7D and the adapter on the EOS-M or the EF-M mount version?

It will be very large lens on a tiny (EOS-M) body. Pity they don`t plan a smaller version for mirrorless cameras (like 8/7.5mm fish-eye variants).

Link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 14:22 UTC

No, not again! It was already announced two years ago, and according to that, it should be in production for two years by now...

Link | Posted on Dec 6, 2013 at 10:25 UTC as 35th comment
On article Another Hasselblad rebadge or Photoshopped hoax? (184 comments in total)

Hoax based on new Sonies...

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2013 at 18:44 UTC as 46th comment
On article Panasonic GX7 First Impressions Review (1200 comments in total)
In reply to:

chris_j_l: I won't be waiting to get this at a lower price. The silent shutter is enough to clinch the deal. Drama & Theatre work requires a silent camera and carrying a blimp that just makes my 5D quiet rather than silent is just a PITA. The ISO limitation is a non-issue.
I look forward to finding the first place in the UK that will sell me one.

Not only silent, but with sensor-shift IS makes it usable in low light within ISO limitation. Oly 1.8/75mm (or my 1.8/105 Nikkor :) and many other lenses) looks a good choice for such use... And also some other situations.

Link | Posted on Aug 2, 2013 at 14:44 UTC

They (Samyang) had already announced 2.8/10mm lens for APS-C DSLR`s, and nothing till today. The lens release date was supposed to be November 2012...
Should I believe them now for 16mm?

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2013 at 19:27 UTC as 34th comment

It would be great if it had IR-trigger receptor at frond AND rear side of the body. I like this feature at D7000 very much. I use rear one 98% of the time when camera on tripod, in conjunction with MLU function.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2012 at 08:12 UTC as 36th comment
In reply to:

KentbertLee: oh my G...its uglyyyyy..nikonnnn what are you doinnnnnnn!

Not ugly in my eyes... Much better design than V1.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 06:21 UTC
Total: 114, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »