nemark

Everything looks nice but.... I hope when it comes to production it will have REMOVABLE tripod collar.

Everything looks nice but.... I hope when it comes to production it will have REMOVABLE tripod collar.
(And hope for an 4/300mm and 5.6/400mm prime (IS?) from some of the third party manufacturer...

Everything looks nice but.... I hope when it comes to production it will have REMOVABLE tripod collar.
(And hope for an 4/300mm and 5.6/400mm non-mirror prime (IS?) from some of the third party...

But it is long discontinued and hard to find...

John D., I presume we are talking in this thread about Foveon sensors in Sigma cameras generally ("I still wish someone other than Sigma had taken on Foveon sensors."), no matter interchangeable...

...And you can use only Sigma lenses on these bodies, no matter how good these bodies are. To be honest, I have nothing against Sigma lenses as I use a lot of them on both Nikon and EOS cameras...

You buy that expensive Sigma camera only if you are IN LOVE with Sigma. So no reason to hate Sigma. I have nothing against Sigma (I use a lot of their lenses), but would never buy a body - no...

Still I think it is too expensive camera body doomed only to Sigma lenses. I`ll rather go for another brand body (as good or better for less or so money) capable for that brand lenses AND Sigma,...

Still I think it is too expensive camera body doomed only to Sigma lenses. I`ll rather go for another brand body (as good or better for less or so money) capable for that brand lenses AND Sigma,...

Hm...

PolarHki, what you said describing a hypothetical, cheaper Fuji X camera, with all mentioned things in it, tells me that it should not be cheaper, just different. And I don`t wish it to become...

PolarHki, what you said describing a hypothetical, cheaper Fuji X camera, with all mentioned things in it, tells me that it should not be cheaper, just different. And I don`t wish it to become...

PolarHki, what you said describing a hypothetical, cheaper Fuji X camera, tells me that it should not be cheaper, just different.

PolarHki, what you said describing a hypothetical, cheaper Fuji X camera, with all mentioned things in it, tells me that it should not be cheaper, just different.

To ZvonimirTosic:
"But I hope Leica will at least eliminate the cost problem..."
It would not be Leica, than... ;)

Maybe, but tightly...

NEX7 has only one, maybe two lenses, and that is (along with to mauch pixels for lenses to match) its only and big drawback.

If you remove EVF, I won`t even look at it...
(With one, Canon G1x would be a great point-and-shoot camera)

With a price close to Leicas?

Reding your wish-list tells me nothing how shall that new camera be les expencive but lower quality, but that way, no, thank you.