Deorum

Deorum

Lives in Greece Athens, Greece
Works as a Sports Photographer
Has a website at www.georgespyros.com
Joined on May 4, 2003
About me:

Sports Photography 4win!

Comments

Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8
On Canon EOS 5DS R added to studio test scene comparison article (518 comments in total)
In reply to:

BarnET: Have to admit.
For a 50mp sensor the ISO performance is pretty impressive!

Why you assume that more MP would mean worse iso performance?
when did this happen?

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2015 at 17:39 UTC
In reply to:

Old Cameras: If it performs well (is sharp) wide open and has good focus mechanics it could be a bargain.

Its manual focus, what good focus mechanics can a manual focus lens have so it is a bargain?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 18, 2015 at 19:20 UTC
On CP+ 2015: Canon shows off new EOS 5DS and 5DS R article (124 comments in total)
In reply to:

Just a Photographer: More resolution at the cost of image sharpness of everything over f8.0 due to diffraction. People will soon find out that the more megapixels doesn't automatically imply more sharpness and detail.

To start learning about physics and the laws of nature and why diffraction kicks in with this camera. Read this:

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/diffraction-photography.htm

FYI. The Canon 5Ds sensor pixel density is 4.1uM.

There are no "LAWS of NATURE" that prohibit certain things, dont say things that are invalid. Especially there is no LAW of NATURE that says "PAST 50mp, in a FF camera, resolution drops".
The Laws of Nature, are fundamental laws, thermodynamics, gravity etc, week/strong nuclear forces. all other things considered, theoretically we could achieve sharpness... at plank level.
This old myth is persistent since 10 years ago, when we went from 2mp to 6 or 8mp. And keeps being disproved and disproved, again and again.
The exact same words that "you cant beat laws of nature" As if there is such a law. More like a hypothesis at some point.
More resolution is better, albeit we have diminishing returns, but... not worst in any case.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2015 at 10:03 UTC
On DxO releases FilmPack 4.5 article (36 comments in total)

I always wondered why EU prices are the same number of € vs $. GBP is correctly about 1/2 of $.
What about €€???

Direct link | Posted on Dec 8, 2013 at 12:40 UTC as 9th comment
On Magic Lantern enables Canon EOS 50D raw video output article (36 comments in total)

Great an option for my 1ds3 too, would be great!

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2013 at 08:37 UTC as 10th comment
On ***** in the Norway challenge (16 comments in total)

It is a great place and spot and moment, but not a great photo. Colors are really suppressed, could be B/W almost, and information very limited.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 3, 2012 at 07:18 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Ross Becker: I've never had IS on any lens so never miss it. And I almost always have the minimum shutter speed set to faster than the longest FL. I use 2 x 1D4s with a super wide on one (12-22mm) & an 80-200mmL on the other Both cameras set to Av & auto ISO. Perfect images every time. Who needs IS? Not me.

Ross, you have such beatifull bodies with the 80-200? It was good for its era, but nowhere near 70-200 (all versions)!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2012 at 14:47 UTC

.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2012 at 14:46 UTC as 10th comment
Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8