moimoi

To me, the choice is rather easy: 70-400 II without any doubt.  Better glass, sharper and better reach than the 70-300. So if you can afford it, and if you have the need for that type of...

So that there will be no standalone version for CS7, and other products from the Adobe suite... Same above... Sure, but they clearly represent a niche market at the moment, no fierce...

Yes, he did an excellent job.  I thought some of his photos were very good, and a few excellent!!!

SonyAlphaRumors because they make me smile...  More seriously, Image Resources and Mansurov website.  Ken Rockwell's website is funny but nothing too serious.  Dpreview is not that interesting,...

Hi, I am sure you are all aware of this: Link to Adobe Subscriptions I wonder what you think about it.  My personal take is that it is quite shameful.  If they want us to be sheep feeding...

The first one has great contrast.  Though, you should clean your sensor, it must have collected some nasty dust over time.  There are plenty of dust spots, specially on the first...

I think I stop understanding Sony's strategy as it makes little sense to me.  In my opinion, the 35 mm f/2 would be a superb addition for street photography/people shooters, because it will be...

I really agree.  A possible 400 mm f/4 may satisfy a few, but not many of us => less money for the company. Sony needs to focus on updating their "more conventional" lenses.  Where is the 35 mm f/2...

I agree with Answell.  Horizon in most cases has to be straight.  Though best photos generally do not follow rules, this one is a good example.   In my opinion, simply a fantastic shot, very...

First I did not say it was crap, bit it certainly not on par with the other excellent G lenses, and certainly not at f/1.4 If people are happy with this lens, I am fine with it but some other...

The other lenses you are mentioning are indeed excellent even wide open. I was more concerned only with the 35 mm. Measurebators are out of my world, photography is not about babbling behind a...

Could you provide some samples when shot wide open (f/1.4) at full resolution? I want to see how sharp the focused plan is ?I am willing to provide samples of the Rokinon if necessary. Then, let...

Check the Sigma on lens rentals or other website..  Better bokeh than the Nikon 35mm f/1.4 G.  DigitalRev also concurs with this.

Yes, because the lens performance at f/1.4 is actually pretty poor.  Sony or Zeiss needs to work on a newer version of that lens. BUT Sigma is now releasing a new 35 mm, which pretty takes care....

There is little point to get a f/1.4 lens if you need to step it down to f/2.2.  Personally, the main point to get a f/1.4 lens is to use it at its widest aperture, otherwise get a cheaper 35 mm...

No, it should not be.  A good copy of a f/1.4 lens whether it is 35mm, 50mm or 85 mm should be sharp wide open.  Even though the dof is very shallow, the part which should be in focus should be...

Check Mansurov's Sigma review.  This is exactly what I have encountered with my copy.

Yup, I confirm the Sony (Minolta) 35mm f/1.4 is terrible wide open.  The Rokinon I have is miles ahead wide open (which is the reason one wants to use a f/1.4 lens, you want to use it within the...

Well, it is sharp but it is not consistent, one time the focus will be nailed, and another time it won't be.  At that price tag, one should expect a good product, unfortunately, the Sigma failed...

It was this model:  Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Lens