sandy b

sandy b

Lives in United States Southern Minn, United States
Works as a tech writer
Joined on Jan 4, 2002

Comments

Total: 469, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Kaj E: A small step in the right direction. The final solution is to start selling the software again instead of renting it.

Adobe would get their customers back.

I am. Look at their stock prices, profits and industry reports.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 12, 2014 at 17:45 UTC
In reply to:

Kaj E: A small step in the right direction. The final solution is to start selling the software again instead of renting it.

Adobe would get their customers back.

Cc has over two million subscribers. It's a great success for adobe.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 12, 2014 at 17:04 UTC

The lack of trust does not seem to extend much past DPR. 1.8 million subscribers. Up 405,000 between Jan and March.

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20140318006472/en/Adobe-Reports-Strong-Q1-FY2014-Results#.U8CjFPldV8G

Direct link | Posted on Jul 12, 2014 at 02:58 UTC as 32nd comment | 4 replies
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (432 comments in total)
In reply to:

AEPA: What the Nikon one is about and can do..http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53950702

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/54005215

Direct link | Posted on Jul 11, 2014 at 18:47 UTC
In reply to:

Danny: Say NO(!) to CC software. You know why.

I say yes. I pay .30 a day for LR and PS CC. It's one of the cheapest things I do on a daily basis. It's fine if you don't want the cloud, but Adobe has made clear that LR will remain cloud free if you prefer and has even made it partially functionally if you opt out.

Stop acting like your on a Holy crusade, it software, not salvation.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 11, 2014 at 18:33 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (432 comments in total)

Look through the Nikon 1 forum. Especially at the shots with this camera and the new 70-300. 810 mm handheld, with fantastic IQ in a small package. The AF on this camera is phenomenal.
No, its not for everybody, but costs the same as high end Fujii, and this runs circles around it for AF and video.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2014 at 11:44 UTC as 14th comment
In reply to:

hetedik: Excuse me, what Big Differences???
I don’t see anything that would make anybody to jump on the D810. Of course, if you have already some Nikon glasses, then you are happy for an upgrade now and then. But for all other people, the D810 doesn’t really give any “Big Difference” for this money.

Even worse, the D810 is a dead-end. The near future, for some companies already the present, is a mirrorless, hybrid camera, being good for still and film/video as well. The real future is a camera with the “right” ergonomics, taking only film, and we can self pick the best frame out of the 24/25/30… what we have per second.

I also believe this is paid “Camera News”.
The real title should have been:
Why Small Amounts of Money Obviously Make a Big Difference to the Nikon's D810 review :-)

I think, Nikon should use the money for product development instead of marketing. If Nikon’s strategy doesn’t change, I think, they are out of the marked in 5-10 years. Seriously.

John, do you actually read the tripe you write?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2014 at 14:32 UTC
In reply to:

Black Box: I'm always surprised just how easily manufacturers reveal the mistakes they made with a certain model... after the next generation has come out. Oh, yeah, the shutter shock was terrible, but we fixed it in the new model. Yeah, there were some issues with this and that, but it's okay now, we fixed it.

I'm just trying to imagine someone who bought this camera at $3000+ a year ago (or whenever that was) and now finds out that he can have them all fixed! For another $3000+. Gosh, Nikon is good at solving customers' problems!

So your suggesting that the 5D should have had all the refinements of the 5D3. Product upgrade is natural and its how we get better products and manufacturers stay in business. The D810 is not particularly aimed at D00/E owners, unless the feel the desire to upgrade. Silly post.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2014 at 14:27 UTC
In reply to:

Daniel Lauring: Truly revolutionary would be a hybrid SLR/mirrorless. With both Canon and Nikon their live view plays a distant second fiddle. They should make it as good as mirrorless cameras with fast focus and focus peaking.

From hardware zone: Thanks to a new image sensor readout method, the D810’s live view monitor can now be used to more easily find the focus peak even when zoomed in, allowing you to quickly confirm that you’ve achieved pinpoint focus. Playback images can be magnified up to approx. 46x (Large-size images in FX format) for quick and precise focus confirmation.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 28, 2014 at 17:03 UTC
In reply to:

GlobalGuyUSA: Does anyone know if its possible to have "FOCUS PEAKING" in LiveView with a Nikon or Canon DSLR? I noticed they added Zebra stripes to the D810 -- but what about Focus Peaking in LIVE VIEW mode? Isn't this possible?

Its a shame Nikon named the new horizon level "Split Screen" because what I am thinking is that in a Df 2 camera, when in LIVE VIEW, the user should be able to have Focus Peaking + a simulated "split screen" (Katz Eye style) for manual focus (by magnifying a circle in the center and applying highlights when its focus).

Just a thought!

Hasn't the screen magnification on the D810 been drastically improved, mitigating focus peaking to some extent?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 28, 2014 at 16:53 UTC
In reply to:

digiart: Four articles in just two days about a camera that is a small improvement on a previous model! No wonder CANIKON own the DSLR market ;)

You mean vs the ten articles on the Sony RX100 since May?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 28, 2014 at 16:42 UTC
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1533 comments in total)
In reply to:

phazelag: I am surprised they put that much thought into video and left it 1080. Thats a huge investment to make on a format is not the latest and greatest. I think for video I would get the GH4 to future proof my work.

How much horsepower to shoot 36 FF mp @4K? How many other FF cameras shoot 4K? Or even crop cameras? GH4 and A7s, but its only 12 mp, and has to have a recorder for 4K. More pain than it worth at this point. SOrry, its fringe at this point.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2014 at 12:49 UTC
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1533 comments in total)
In reply to:

lacikuss: Hey Nikon D800 owner, how do you feel about loosing 30% of the value of your not two year old camera in one day? I've got lucky when they fully replaced my D600 but you can{t say the same...

A company that keep churning nonsense upgraded cameras (read Thom Hogan) instead of passing on improved functionality with newer firmwares is a company that is only interested in milking their loyal customer base.

I wonder how many of the D810 upgrades could have been done with only a firmware update for the D800?

Most of the D810 improvements are hardware based. And electronic devices always fall in value on an upgrade. The D2x plummeted like a rock when the D300 came out. Same story as the D3x. Fact of life. These are cameras, not investments. And the D800, D3X and D2x still take pictures every bit as good as the day they were bought. And the D810 upgrade is a very strong upgrade for an "S" IMO.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2014 at 01:22 UTC
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1533 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zoron: I am getting D900...not this incremental upgrade....who's with me?

"Bad" product, eh? Your an idiot. And I didn't even get paid for saying that.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 14:23 UTC
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1533 comments in total)
In reply to:

Falko: While Nikon's traditional fan base may not be bothered by the lack of wireless, 4k video, 1080p at high frame rates, focus peaking or an articulated touch-screen, I think it makes the D810 look old fashioned before it's even out the gates.

And if it looks dated now, how's it going to look in two or more years during the typical lifespan of this product? Remember this is not a cheap camera and even now you can buy a Sony A7r with the same sensor size and resolution, Wifi, focus peaking and a tilting screen for two thirds the price...

It looks like the best high rez, state of the art DSLR on the market to me, that can actually do pro AF. Not sure what your looking at.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 14:06 UTC
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1533 comments in total)
In reply to:

Beckler8: I'm pleased others here are also talking about 4K video. HD-only can't really be justified on a top-end SLR and especially when 4K TV's are now readily available. Essentially you're forced to decide whether you want higher quality video or stills (i.e. GH4 or D810). Who will be the first to have both? (Not counting Canon 1DC because of 10k price.)

This is primarily a stills camera, with very good video. You want 4k DSLR for $3000? Go get one from Canon, or Oly, or Fuji, oh, wait, nevermind.
4K is not even a standard yet, with almost zero market penetration. I think it won't be mainstream for 5 years.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 14:01 UTC
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1533 comments in total)
In reply to:

select: nice improvements, but the lack of 4k video, wifi and gps, is a shame for a camera that costs over 3k euros

OK, Select, explain why Nikon is only one of two camera makers actually making a profit selling cameras. ALL manufacturers' are losing market share, its a down market.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 13:54 UTC
On Rare photos of Nagasaki destruction auctioned article (109 comments in total)
In reply to:

Smeggypants: One of the world's most extreme acts of terrorism. We should never forget so that such a repulsive act never happens again!!!

The bombs were dropped on Aug 6th and 9th. Nagasaki was also leafleted warning its civilians to flee, many of whom did. Japan still did not surrender for another 6 days, on the 15th.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 9, 2014 at 02:16 UTC
On Rare photos of Nagasaki destruction auctioned article (109 comments in total)
In reply to:

mcshan: These photos have a value and I have no trouble with the auction.

I had the distinct pleasure of meeting Maj. Charles Sweeney (who was born on a street nearby to where I type this). He was a fine man. I also met Col. Paul Tibbets (post war Big. Gen.) and I consider it an honor to have spent some time with him. Tibbets was the best of the best. For an earlier generation it was not uncommon to hear "there goes Paul Tibbets.. the man who ended the war."

A ground war with Japan would have been costly. An additional loss of 700,000 to 1 million lives would have been worse.

And a ground war with Japan would have been very costly, the small island battles exacted a terrible toll. Japan had committed terrible atrocities before and during the war, the Allies and people of the west were in no mood to accept anything but unconditional surrender. The Japanese government NEVER initiated peace overtures prior to Hiroshima.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 8, 2014 at 04:01 UTC
On Rare photos of Nagasaki destruction auctioned article (109 comments in total)
In reply to:

mcshan: These photos have a value and I have no trouble with the auction.

I had the distinct pleasure of meeting Maj. Charles Sweeney (who was born on a street nearby to where I type this). He was a fine man. I also met Col. Paul Tibbets (post war Big. Gen.) and I consider it an honor to have spent some time with him. Tibbets was the best of the best. For an earlier generation it was not uncommon to hear "there goes Paul Tibbets.. the man who ended the war."

A ground war with Japan would have been costly. An additional loss of 700,000 to 1 million lives would have been worse.

Boss, not quite true, see...http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/17313/were-the-japanese-suing-for-peace-prior-to-the-bombings-of-hiroshima-and-nagasak

Direct link | Posted on Jun 8, 2014 at 03:51 UTC
Total: 469, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »