Runs fine on a win7, I7-2600, 16gb, 500gb ssd. Seems pretty fast. Seems to work ok with NX-D.
Wont replace my current tool setup of PS and lightroom, but for someone that has a fast machine and does not want to spend lots of money it would be adequate.
Wags48: Lots of discussion regarding the D7200 v D7100. But is it a worthwhile upgrade from the D7000?
Yes, in every way. Just read the specs.
Gosman: Still not the D400. Still not like the Pentax K-3 that has been out a year and a half!
K3 has a plastic interior frame just like the D7200.
ZAnton: Does this mean I will never ever read whining about D400 again?I am afraid it doesn't...
A tip to Nikon - make an additional service for changing the badge d7200 to d400 for $200.
So tell me again how many years it took Canon to update its camera?
jennyrae: Nikon is competing with Canon on "how far can you strip a camera" game.
Still has IQ and AF as good or better than any. But, hey, its a camera, what does that matter.
amd111: When can we expect full DPR review of D7200?
DPR reviewed 6 Sony cameras last year, more than any other. Nice try though.
dylanear: "It offers the same continuous shooting performance as the D300S"
Um.... the D300 did 7, 8 with the grip. The D7200 does 6fps. The D300 came out in 2008. Somehow 7 years later 2fps slower is "the same", when to my brain we should be expecting 2fps more (10fps, hopefully without the grip).
Is DPReview getting money from Nikon for their slowball analysis of their product line? Afraid admitting the huge gap in Nikon's line up where a D400 should go will hurt D7200 sales over at Amazon.com??
Only in 12 bit. !4 bit is 2 FPS. Ouch.
quezra: I like how they complained about the lack of a flash on this camera
Because the 750 has a flash. Duh.
stevemogg: Hmmm I was thinking of moving to Fuji but I have been pleased with my D7100 and wanted to wait to see what the new camera offered. There is nothing here that would entice me to stay with Nikon. Very disappointing and whilst it will probably be a good camera, more ground will be lost to the CSC brigade.
What would you gain other than size? IQ and AF favor Nikon.
prossi: Seems Canikon are not getting the fact that DSLR market is imploding and that there are way too many cameras plus all the old models that are still good enough and never really go away. Incremental updates like these are not going to cut it. And they are also not getting that the only people buying DSLR are people hanging out on this site. Who among the readers here has the time and inclination for cameras like nikon D3xxx D5xxx & canon rebel line? If you have $700 for a D5500 then you have $1800 for a 7DII. Sell 1ff, 1apsc, 1ff pro concept so stratospherically priced that nobody's going to buy - that's all you need. Make them really nice save the money on logistics and part farms.
Prossi, got some numbers? Canon and Nikon are #1 and 2, with Sony a distsant third. Nikons DX lineup will outsell the OLY, Fuji, Panny and Pentax line up all by itself. It will handily outsell the entire Sony lineup. And that D7100 sold well over a million units, maybe a couple, in its lifespan. Thats 1 camera. Oly sells about 500,000 a year. Combined. Pentax less. Fuji not much more. the market is shinking, but canon and Nikon are keeping their sales pecentages. THEY will be the last companies standing.
jadmaister2: Small but significant upgrades keep the DX Nikons ticking over JUST.My gripe (since gripe is what we do best here it seems) is that Nikon fail to support wide angle shooters with suitable quality glass at a sensible cost.Yes Nikon have a good lens range, but recent releases do seem to favour DX shooters. Since my interest in landscape has increased I think the 7200 and it's lenses have just persuaded me to make the jump to a D750:)
Brownie, you mean like this:
Sad Joe: I am sure that this new camera will fine - it's only with cheaper FF cameras that Nikon's QC seems to have gone of a cliff - having said that the main improvement over the D7100 seems to be a decent sized buffer ( at last) - which I am not 100 % certain Nikon could not have done via a decent software update…then again they need to flog new kit….FLARE test coming DPR ???
It would be a good trick to increase buffer memory with a software upgrade. Look, the 7100 was awesome to begin with, this improves on it with improved AF, IQ (Sony) and buffer. Thats enough to keep at the top of cameras in its class. Pretty well specced at 1200 if you ask me. The new Multi-CAM 3500DX II is pretty much pro level.
Couscousdelight: -3Ev sensitivity, Like a 3 Y.O. Pentax K5IIs...wow !In 2020, USB 3 should be available for Nikon expert cameras.
And the Nikon will still out AF the Pentax 6 ways from Sunday.
rarecoinman: Question is should someone who is not in bed with a brand pick D7200 kit for 1696 or buy a canon 6d for 1999?
Or actullay compare apples to apples like The D610 and the 6D. The D7200 and 6D are apples and oranges. The one has a way better AF and is cropped, and the other is an incredible high ISO machine. What do you shoot?
And what your not getting is that while the market maybe imploding, Nikon and Canon Still control 80% of the market. They maybe making less money, but they are still doing better than the others.If you think that 1200 for this camera is strato priced buy a fuji or Oly. Oh, wait, NM, they are even higher.
phoenix15: What a fantastic camera... Not !Sorry Nikon, you can't compete with Canon EOS 7D II. Even the 2 years old pentax K-3 beats you in many aspect. With that price tag, if I have money I will buy Olympus OMD 5 II.
Are you kidding? Whats the weak point? This camera has the same AF as the D750, which is one of the best, if not the best, AF in the world. Blows all those you mentioned away except perhaps the Canon. Sealed, good buffer, great IQ, fast. This is going to be one of Nikon best sellers, it fixed all the week points holding back the D7100, for under $1200.00.
koolbreez: I don't really see a reason to upgrade from already owning the D7100. Increased buffer, and built in WiFi, as opposed to the plugin module, don't justify spending $1200 for these minor upgrades. There are no significant improvements to justify the cost IMO.
The Sony sensor will be better, as will the AF, but true, this is certainly not aimed a current users. I certainly won't buy the 7100 now I know this has the Sonty sensor. I always thought the 7100 was a bit gritty. But that brings up the subject of why upgrade every generation. Bit expensive.
nicolaiecostel: No flip screen, only 6 fps when the 7Dmk2 is 10 fps, USB 2.0, only 1920x1080, same sensor.
Why did Nikon bother, for a buffer upgrade ? And where is the 7Dmk2 rival ?
this camera never was a Mkii Rival. Its still a pretty damned fine camera for the price with a very mature feature set. Except for 10 fps I would take this camera over the Canon just based on the Sony sensor.
attomole: I don't see many comments just saying what a great article this is, nice to see it in use real world use rather than lab and just the testament of the reviewer. The The quality of the photography and video was great. please put up some stills.
Stephan Def: IMO Nikon has lost it. Instead of putting focusing motors and image stabilization on all of their DSLR's they do this ... I mean how many will they actually sell? Will they even be able to recover their costs on that model?
p.s. oh, nearly forgot this: and they discontinue capture-nx2 with no adequate alternative, leaving their niche professional clientele scratching their heads about how to do any serious post processing of their highly customized nikon raw files.
Sorry, I would never switch to Penatx for something I already have. As nice as Pentax cameras are, their lens selection is too limiting IMO. Besides, Nikons implementation of VR is extremely good, 4-5 stops, and works flawless, and cameras with IBIS, their lens are really not any cheaper. Or better.