Auricom: SONY: does hearing that name send euphoric energy ripples up and down your spine? /:o
No. Thats a little sickening.
thomas2279f: Sony delivering a good range of Full Frame Mirrorless camera and range - making a mockery of the other 2 previously large Camera companies Canon and Nikon.
Sony is clearly making headway, but camera sales are still small compared to the big 2.
lacikuss: Awesome, Sony is moving the dynamics of the FF market a la P&S....
They already own Nikon now is time to beat Canon!
They are like Toyota beating GM slowly and steadily.
Thats is true. But not the camera division, the imaging division. The camera division buys them too. I have no problem with Sony or there cameras. I have problems with fan boys talking about Sony owning Nikon.
Yeah Sony owns Nikon. The best selling A7 on Amazon: Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #954 in Camera & Photo (See Top 100 in Camera & Photo) #35in Electronics > Camera & Photo > Digital Cameras > Compact System Cameras
Nikon will sell more D750's than the entire A7 series combined.
Richard Franiec: Perhaps Alpha 7II is a good news for Canon and Nikon.They can easily survive (at least for some time) by offering their lenses in E-mount LOL.
Sure. The highest A7 ranked sales on Amazon is #954 overall. I am sure Nikon and Canon are quaking in their boots. Still a nice specced camera if it wasnt so butt ugly.
"Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #954 in Camera & Photo (See Top 100 in Camera & Photo) #35in Electronics > Camera & Photo > Digital Cameras > Compact System Cameras "
Add the D750 to your gear in story list.
andix: Why is this relevant? It's not. Move along, nothing to see here.
You mean like the Pink Oly shown in your gear?
Gazeomon: I feel sorry for that great sensor imprisoned in some tarty dolled up retro junk.
It will run circles around IQ and AF of your cameras.
I think it looks pretty cool, some gold trim in an understated way, for about the same price. Looks more classy than the Pentax lolly pop colored cameras.e
cgarrard: It's as good as...... oh wait, no its not.
Its as good as......the Pentax FF....oh, wait....
Neuroanatomist: as a pro i might stick to canon for a bit longer.but for average joe customers canon has nothing exciting to offer anymore.
samsung and sony cameras offer something new and great features only a mirrorless can offer.
nikon and canon are dinosaurs.
Adaptors are a joke for anything but portrait or landscape, and make the camera bulkier. And as far as ignoring dx, the Nikon D3300 alone outsells the entire fuji dx lineup. And the D7100 is unmatched in AF and features. For all the talk, Nikon and canon still have over 75% market share. And canon has just released the incredible 7D2. Lens and cameras Canikon still dominate, and are not just sitting on their laurels.
Nikon and Canon may be dinosaurs, but they have the best bottom to top lineups in the industry. From the D3200 to the D4s, not a dog to be had. They all AF well and take from decent to spectacular images. And they have an excellent set of lens to choose from. The NX1 will be a fine camera indeed if it can match the D7100 in IQ or AF. And I hope it does. I wish all cameras could be great winners.
taktak91: >So if you're one of those people that's still holding out for a replacement for the D300S... well, you might be looking at it.
If that's true, I'll have to shop elsewhere.
He said looking for a D300s replacement. The D300 line is known for pro build and PRO AF. That is the reason most have not moved on and are waiting for a D400.
None of the Pentax will AF track as well as the D7100 or the D300. They do have a better buffer. But I would not think it qualifies as a D300 upgrade.
papa natas: A camera that NEVER went to the moon as well as the crew.
Ahh, a flat worlder. You already entered the subject. And any fool or grifter can publish a book. It always amuses me the easiest to prove is the one the conspriacy nuts go after.
munro harrap: In the Uk they cost £1700, that's £550 more than the D610 which has the same resolution, but lacks Face recognition AF due to the low-pixel count sensor. The price difference is considerable. Is the image quality better? I have really no idea at all.
Whether this new machine is better in UK averaged lighting conditions over a year, remains to be seen
"When you put together all of them it becomes obvious we are being taken for a ride yet again, since the noise which at 800 and above is BAD on a D600/D610, is a sure way of getting you to buy a D750."
Really? The D600 is bad above ISO 800? I better sell mine.
The kids will buy it. DPR folks, not so much.
ThomasSwitzerland: Ken Rockwell has just published snapshots on the D750 with the 20mm f/1.8.
To me this represents outstanding journalistic quality in time and precision. Why cannot the so much larger <dpreview> deliver?
Thomas, you think those snapshots with the circus colors (Ken always shoots in vivid mode), are better and more timely than the DPR ones? Ken is quicker a lot of the time, mostly because he can review cameras without having one.
Ron A 19: So much anti-Canon sentiment here! And yet, Canon offers the most complete lineup of any camera and lens maker out there and is the only company that makes a real profit in this business. If you want expensive "enthusiast" gear, there are many options that are compatible with Canon cameras. If you're a pro who makes money from photography, Canon is an excellent company. People on photo gear forums act as if images taken before 2014 are subpar in image quality. Rest assured, the new dual processor fast focusing 7DII can crush almost any other camera for sports. Nobody needs a gigapan image taken at iso 402k or a 1 kg 35mm lens.
And you are a rude one day wonder troll.
LOL, quite a dossier of junk for one day. Let me guess, you've been banned before.