No built in flash?
tkbslc: Why does it make so many FF shooters angry when people using cameras with smaller sensors have access to nice lenses that they can use to make good photos? Is it some kind of defense mechanism so they can feel better about buying FF?
The camera and the lenses, well actually almost all of the gear is SMALLER. Im a Nikon DX shooter but for the past 2 years I leave my Nikon home and just bring my small Olympus XZ-1 with me. I know its not as good in IQ, and specially not in low light but for me as a causual shooter it is quite often good enough. (Thinking of upgrading to a sony compact though)
Nissin Bah! I bought the 866 (mk1) to have with my D90, worked like a charm. But then i got a D5100 and the D866 needed a firmware upgrade, easy it seemed, coz you were supposed to be able to update through USB. No go, others had similar problems, so finally I turned in for service at the shop were I had bought it. Kindly enough they helped me and said they would send it to the Nissin repair, without cost. Good, they had the flashgun for about two months, meanwhile I had gotten used to stick to my trusted SB400. So I got the flashgun back, put in on a shelf and there it was for about 3-4 months, untill I was to shoot a friends wedding. So naturally I opted for the Nissin, imagine my suprise when I found out that they never had upgraded the firmware, it was still the old incompatible one. So never Nissin again for me. (This was in Sweden)
(unknown member): Comments I have read varies from FANTASTIC to TERRIBLE camera and in between. One contributor insisted on "improper assembly" that cause the flares. On a precision instrument, tolerances and fit are very tight. Moreover, self indexing components and automated assembly eliminate human errors.
I do not have a clue on the process and design used by Nikon on this D750. I believe Sony manufactures the sensors for Nikon. Regardless, this points to a terrible Quality Control since not all D750 exhibits the problem.
If this and other problem spread to Nikon's future D4 successor, then Nikon loose credibility.
@HowaboutRAW Just tbeing curious, but I have been reading your comments for some time now, and was just wondering, are you actually using this wealth of information that you posses to actually take pictures and if you do, may we see any of them?
ashokvashisht: New to DSLR's. Was planning to buy a Nikon D5300. Looks good but I would have to invest in two lenses i.e. a 17-50/17-70 mm for the landscapes, portraits and the like and a 70-300 mm for wildlife.
I am not a pro but would like to take crisp images with great colour and details. I would be taking prints upto 8x12" max and normally share on Facebook.
Or would it be better for me to forget the D5300 and invest in the new Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ1000 ?
I would like my photos to be sharp both at the wide and telephoto ends. Also, will the D5300 (if I choose it) be reasonably good at dust sealing ? Is the quality of dust sealing decided by the camera body specs or the lens or is it a combination of both ?
Well, If you are going to shoot while travelling in the open jeep in a dusty area I would try to get a weather sealed camera & lens. I personally only have the D5100 but I dont think there is to much of a difference when it comes to sealing and I would rather spend the money to either get a D7000 or a D7100 (or why not a used D3 or D300s?) if you really need a DSLR, but if you dont a mirrorless could be a very good tool and the OM-D5 is very good.
Hi ashokvashisht! Well, if the main reason would be publisihng on Facebook it wouldn´t matter much which one you choose. But if you are also going to make prints I would suggest the Nikon D5300. When it comes to dust sealing BOTH the camera and the lens need to be sealed. May I suggest an alternative, why not have a look at the Olympus OM-D5? They are at an end of their lifespan but is an excellent camera.
Looks nice, will try one in IRL soon I hope
mr.izo: ik, it's canon campaign, but dpreview basicaly make false idea on global scale, so canon usa site get more clicks..not realy fair towards dpreview users, id you ask me. but that was expected when site went to to texas..
DPR is a website that is supposed to report anything like this, something they did in an entirely legit way. And as mr Hoff above points out, they did it with a tongue in cheek remark. I think your remarks on the other hand are so harsh because you choose to interpert DPR in a way that made you expect something entirely different and now you are trying to blame DPR for your own overblown feelings.
Kabalyero: Timer just reached zero...nothing happened. Am i missing something?
Im from sweden and right now it is 04.55.27 left viewing from here.
T3: All the ideas people have suggested seem to ignore the fact that whatever Canon is announcing, it has to be something that has been considered "impossible" by everyone else. Basically, the teaser is saying, "You guys all thought this [whatever it is] was impossible, but we don't see it that way. We've made it possible. We've made this product that everyone else has been saying *can't be done*."
Either this product is truly extraordinary and ground-breaking, or they are setting themselves up for major disappointment. It kind of reminds me of Nikon's Df teasers. So much mystery, so much hype, so much anticipation. But it all ended up being a bit anti-climactic when the Df was finally introduced. Canon has set the bar even higher, by essentially claiming that they are going to introduce a product once considered "impossible" and "can't be done." We'll see if they can live up to that claim.
Well, I must say I like your way of thinking, so lets keep guessing but with your reasoning in mind, maybe its the first real 3D-picture printer, or a camera that can take pictures in the dark? Its bound (is it?? hmmm) to be something very special.
I like it, even thoug the collor seems to be a tad more dull than Nikon/Olympus. I am seriously curios ab this camera.
Well, canon is famous for their inovations in regarding small cameras, but with new G7X (or was it GX7, or X7G, ehhh, hmmm) I think it must be something else, like a new mirrorless pro camerasystem. But then on the other hand with the ne 7D mk II that dosen´t make sense either, so why not a CANON CAMERA PHONE?
Kim Letkeman: These images are not worth the effort of critically judging the merits of this camera for anyone beyond the level of rank beginner. Too many variables and the images look too much like casual snapshots in the care that was taken (which I think is the process for first look images here.). However, there is certainly potential in what I see here.
Thankyou mr Letkeman, now I KNOW that these pictures are specifically for me and not for all the wonderfully accomplished photographers like yourself. And yes, I do second that "jeez"
Not to bad, nice bokeh.
Fabio Amodeo: The real question to me is: can the NX1 really shoot 15fps with focus tracking? If it can, the demise of DSLR is getting nearer. Both the mirrorless and the DSLR have structural limits: for mirrorless it's processing power, needed by the many functions concentrated on the same circuit; for DSLR it's the mechanical limit of mirror ups and downs. If Samsung has really broken the first limit, the others will have to follow, and soon. So I think the whole industry is asking itself the same question: where will the declining money be in the near future? In my opinion, the vision of Fuji and Samsung (and Leica, but that's another story) is clearer that that of the other players, which seem hesitant on the road to take.
Well, I think there is more to it than sheer speed, what about things like batterylife? IQ? Handling? Etc etc
Im not much for being negativ but seems like Nikon dosent have much to show except the 750. No new small form cameras?
Retzius: "a distinctly iPhone-esque design" - thats a PC way of saying it... they even copied the app icons on the touchscreen
I wonder if there is a flash for the front camera? I think i remember there is one phone that has that (not talking about the phone with rotating camera) but can´t remember what brand it was.
Thanks for the article and I can't beleive that nr 9 is from 1913, her clothes looks so "modern".