Mir_ro

Paul_B Midlands UK: like to see this professional use the IPHONE in dazzling bright sunlight, not inside a double decker ... then see how professional he looks.

Sean65: I think it's pretty cool. It's quite anti gear-head which is likely to anger many on this forum. With an iPhone you just concentrate on the picture and not the gear.

Sean65: I think it's pretty cool. It's quite anti gear-head which is likely to anger many on this forum. With an iPhone you just concentrate on the picture and not the gear.

manmachine242: Smallest sensor, fullHD. I am skeptical.

peevee1: "High low-light performance with an F2.5 bright lens, 1/4.1" BSI Sensor"

OK, those claims of high low-light performance got to stop somewhere. This is getting ridiculous (or just outright fraudulent). The lens/sensor combination has significantly worse low-light performance than even any modern smartphone. If this is "high", what is "low" then?

Francis Carver: QUESTION: Is it "Earthook" or is it "Earhook?"

1920 x 1080 Full-HD video -- by using a 1/4-inch sensor? I know many folks will pass this one up just for that. Seriously, I would have been much happier with at least a 1/2.3-inch sensor doing 720p, and preferably a CCD sensor, as jello and rolling shutter could be pretty brutal with this one.

Live broadcasting over the Internet -- wow, what will they come up with next?

Not getting the orange and black colors though, for a Caucasian (white skinned) person they should have offered it in beige skin tone. I would not mind it dangling it from my ear, but why make it so noticeable? Other uses and positioning for lipstick-cams like this might be inside a bag/purse/knapsack with a small hole perforated, on a shoulder lapel, or on the top end of a shoulder bag's strap. I guess you can try to hide it in plain sight -- or hide it completely.

Too bad there is no external microphone input. Altogether, we should gave Panny an A+ for HX-A100.

qwertyasdf: Who's next! Who's next!
VIVITAR