Kali108

Kali108

Joined on May 23, 2012

Comments

Total: 28, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Pictures emerge showing widely-leaked Fujfilm 'X-T1' article (373 comments in total)

To Cane and others who "just don't get it"...as a D800 owner and daily Canon 5d3 user at work...I will be getting a X-T1 asap. Not the right camera for everyone, but the utter inability of people to judge a camera based on its own merits never ceases to amaze me.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 04:41 UTC as 43rd comment | 1 reply
On Fujifilm teases upcoming SLR-style X system camera article (921 comments in total)
In reply to:

marike6: Do the mushy greens and heavy NR come standard? :-)

But seriously, it's all well and good to make another APS-C camera but with DSLR styling, but unless the RAW conversion issues with Lightroom are sorted (which they really aren't as of yet), it's going to be tough for RAW shooters to get excited about this body.

Doing command line RAW processing with dcraw or investing in yet another converter like Capture One is not all that appealing. Nor is shooting 8-bit JPEGs.

Marike6...actually my Xpro1 made me search for alternatives to Lightroom for which I am very grateful...for my D800 as well as my Xpro1. I much prefer my new workflow...Photomechanic + Iridient Developer. IQ is stellar for XP1...and noticeably better for D800 too.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 08:41 UTC
On Battle of the titans: Top ball heads tested article (268 comments in total)
In reply to:

bronxbombers4: Arca-swiss upside down monoballs like p0 and p1 are awesome. Quick spin and flick and they are locked and they have wide tilt range.

Bronxbomber...oh so true. I've owned a Markins, a RRS...then got a p1, easily my favorite of the bunch.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 14, 2014 at 04:23 UTC
On DPReview Gear of the Year - Part 1: Fujifilm X100S article (307 comments in total)
In reply to:

white shadow: The X100s is a reasonably good camera for casual use and perhaps for travel. Some like the " Leica look alike" look because they couldn't afford the real McCoy Leica M. It is a fairly good camera to take casual portraits. That's about it.

A full frame DSLR is still the more versatile camera if one is serious about photography despite its heavier weight. It will deliver the goods expected of a professional photographer or for those who engaged them to shoot.

Similar to a Micro 4/3 camera, it will remain a camera for casual use or for collectors who like the look. For practical casual use, the Ricoh GR may be better. For sheer convenience, the Lumix LX7 is surprisingly very useful despite its much smaller sensor especially in low light.

White Shadow, by your definitions of "casual" and "professional"...many of the greatest photographers of all time, past and current, would "merely" be casual shooters. That SHOULD give you pause, to say the least. Stop judging the quality of photographers and photographs by how big their camera is. If you look around, you'll find quite a few FF 35mm digital and medium format digital shooters who LOVE cameras such as the x100s. The camera is capable of making iconic images, are we?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 12, 2013 at 22:27 UTC
On Fujifilm X-M1 Review preview (217 comments in total)
In reply to:

rsf3127: I don't get all the hype about these fuji cameras. The image samples look dull, mushy, without contrast and unsharp when compared to NEX and the 100D either in RAW or JPEG. The ergonomy is ok and the build quality is nice, but this does not compensate for the IQ problem.

The Fuji "hype" for me is...having the IQ of a Nikon D600 (I've now sold mine) in a small, light weight package. Allowing me to get images from subjects I would not get otherwise, due to the intimidation factor, etc of a larger DLSR / lens combo.
Also, now I have this IQ potential with me every single day. No way I would carry a D600 kit with me at all times. Fuji makes this a joy.

I understand why dpreview needs to use standardized tests, yet unfortunately, this results in veiling the IQ potential of the x trans sensor. Iridient Developer, C1P7 or the free supplied SilkyPix do not suffer from "mushy" greens and certainly not any lack of detail resolution.

Is the Fuji perfect? Of course not, nor is my D800 or Mamiya RZ67 ProII with a Leaf Aptus 33MP digital back.

My Fuji XP1 (with the incredible 14mm, 23mm soon, 35mm, 60mm lenses) is my favorite photographic tool. Period.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2013 at 03:28 UTC

So the consensus is.."meh"? Really? Hmm. A company provides you with access to observe the realtime working process of very successful photographers with decades of experience... for free... and you criticize them ? You'd prefer a pdf with bullet points? Wow.

Charge too much? Again, really? So, for example, you can get a 3 day workshop for $149 ($99 if purchased during the workshop), please share a better alternative. Please share an alternative for TWICE the PRICE. Photoshop World...$600. Is there an option to view it for free? Nope. CreativeLive sounds pretty freaking generous to *me*. Go take Zack Arias One Light workshop, check out the prices! Maybe Moose Peterson's workshops...check the prices !!!

CreativeLive offers you a full week of content that would cost several thousands of dollars via individual workshops with these individuals...FOR FREE...and you question their motivations and substance?

Ungrateful human beings.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2013 at 18:06 UTC as 4th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

J D Tranquil: As an owner of a Fuji X system camera, I would like a fast, constant-aperture, zoom lens in the lineup, 24-70mm f 2.8 to be exact. Or even f1.8 like the Sigma zoom (f18-35), that's even better.

Steven...at 5.6, probably not much difference vs the zoom. And for landscape, the advantages are very likely, very small for you. Me? I will rarely shoot outside of f1.4 - 2.8. Not for the lowlight ability, but for the shallow depth of field.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 5, 2013 at 20:06 UTC

Best photo news I've heard in a very long time

Direct link | Posted on Sep 2, 2013 at 16:50 UTC as 28th comment
In reply to:

Photomonkey: This is a good move by Ilford. Swan has a great rack record of quality. However one can also get true B&W processing and printing on real B&W paper at Fromex in Long Beach and possibly a few other places.

Thanks for the B&W resources Photomonkey !

Direct link | Posted on Sep 2, 2013 at 16:49 UTC
On ThinkTank introduces TurnStyle sling bag article (24 comments in total)
In reply to:

InTheMist: I didn't even know there was a video until I saw the comment below. The position video is actually pretty good.

I would also like more details about what I can actually fit in it, and other benefits. I wonder if it would fit a MacBook Air?

Mist...you might like one of the new TT Mover bags

Direct link | Posted on Aug 16, 2013 at 18:26 UTC
On ThinkTank introduces TurnStyle sling bag article (24 comments in total)

I think the bag looks pretty good. Turnstyle vs Hubba Hubba Hiney maybe. I know I'm not happy with my LowPro for my Fuji kit.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 16, 2013 at 17:16 UTC as 18th comment

I sure wish Zeiss would at least tell us what FL's they intend to release with the Uber design. Enough with the vague hints, "landscape" etc. I'm very interested in these lenses. Appears to be significantly narrowing the gap with MFDBs at a fraction of the cost.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2013 at 22:42 UTC as 32nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Starkiller: A lens without AF is like a car without power steering. It works, but in 2013 nobody will buy it.

Really Yabo? Have you looked at the Sony / Zeiss lens line up? Hmmm...the Touit Zeiss lenses? Yah, more than capable.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2013 at 22:36 UTC
In reply to:

pavi1: Who told you medium format was dead? It is expensive, but certainly not dead.

MF dead? Non-sense. marike6 is spot on. It's almost required in some arenas of photography. On a personal note, I'll be shooting some MF film on my RZ67 proII this weekend. Still has a "look" I love. Within a year, I'm sure I'll grab a digital back for it as well.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2013 at 00:11 UTC
On Panasonic GX7 First Impressions Review article (1201 comments in total)

I'm pretty embedded with Fuji Xpro1, but I'm jealous of the 1/320th sync speed.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 1, 2013 at 20:19 UTC as 292nd comment | 2 replies
On Fujifilm X100S Review preview (486 comments in total)
In reply to:

Johnsonj: Jpeg rules. RAW is for posers.

Only thing missing is face recognition.

lol ... Revenant !!!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2013 at 21:24 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Review preview (486 comments in total)
In reply to:

rocklobster: Don't apologize - you are just pandering to the brat mentality of the few.

Great review and great camera. Those ISO 6400 sots are the best I have seen on any APS-C sensor.

Cheers

jacketpotato...no, it's not...as ryrychung pointed out. Do you think Canon, Nikon, Sony & Pentax are standardized and 100% accurate in their ISO ratings? Certainly not. Fuji has done a superlative job with the X trans & iso performance.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2013 at 21:14 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Review preview (486 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mikhail Tal: DPR you are giving away gold awards to the majority of cameras now (not counting your "rugged camera" reviews). I'm not saying that the X100s doesn't deserve it but I think you're really diluted the value of a gold award and it's almost like a silver award means its a camera to avoid. You really need to rethink and clearly define your criteria for rating cameras because right now you are sending a lot of mixed messages.

calking....YOU deserve the HALLELUJAH Brother !!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2013 at 21:09 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Review preview (486 comments in total)
In reply to:

photo perzon: Skin tones with no wrinkles. Fuji has detail without texture, as someone else said.

JackM..."print huge" then it's RAW and Iridient Developer. ID kills ACR/LR..seriously.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2013 at 21:04 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Review preview (486 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: Isn't In Camera RAW Noise Reduction a beautiful thing? Oh wait, you can't get that data back if you want it? Ok, never mind.

mpgxsvcd...you're making a mountain out of an anthill. You read somewhere that a tiny bit of noise reduction is present in the "raw" file and *you* conclude it's no longer a true raw file. Utter non-sense. All the more so, since you probably don't own a X Trans cam.

Reading posts like this, is quickly reminding me why I stopped coming to dpreview. Just too much BS to sift through to find even common sense discussions.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2013 at 19:02 UTC
Total: 28, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »