evogt500

evogt500

Lives in United States United States
Joined on May 20, 2009
About me:

Olympus OM-1 (35mm)
Canon EOS Elan 7e (35mm)
Olympus Camedia D-560z (battery eater but no NR!)
Canon EOS 70D
Sony Cybershot DSC-P92 (aperture malfunction)
Canon Powershot SD500 (IXUS 700)
Fujifilm Finepix Z5fd (Best ultra compact camera not mentioned on DPReview)
Fujifilm S200EXR (no ORBS!)

Comments

Total: 47, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

looking at that image of their camera, I can see why they closed it down.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2014 at 09:15 UTC as 139th comment | 2 replies
On Sigma updates USB dock for new lenses article (20 comments in total)
In reply to:

beavertown: Does this USB dock also used for unbreak of 3rd party lenses support in the future? Like nasty Nikon switched off Tamron A005 for the V1 via dirty firmware update.

If yes, Tamron and other 3rd party lenses manufacturers should release a dock like Sigma does.

Yes, Sigma had firmware update for their lens for Nikon cameras that had the "updated" firmware. Example D5300.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 14, 2014 at 01:59 UTC
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1667 comments in total)

70D firmware update

Direct link | Posted on Oct 6, 2014 at 07:01 UTC as 888th comment

I want this and i don't even own a Fuji ILC.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2014 at 05:57 UTC as 31st comment

Canon, fix my 70D's wide aperture autofocus issue.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 5, 2014 at 03:12 UTC as 12th comment

Aww, I thought it was going to be a recall for the 70D's phase detection auto-focus sensor.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 5, 2014 at 23:49 UTC as 14th comment
On Ricoh announces Pentax XG-1 superzoom article (195 comments in total)

I am guessing this camera is made in the same cheap chinese factory as all the other small sensored super zooms from Kodak, Fujifilm, Afga, and Samsung.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 15, 2014 at 03:44 UTC as 61st comment

After seeing Fuji's new line of bridge cameras, I'm happy to still have my S200EXR.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 14:20 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply
On Canon EOS 70D Review preview (660 comments in total)
In reply to:

pixperfect: It seems Canon cameras are getting better and better.

EOS 50D - Magnesium body
EOS 60D - Aliminum body
EOS 70D - Plastic body

Am I missing something?

60D was plastic as well. Both 60D and 70D have metal chassis.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 9, 2013 at 16:32 UTC
In reply to:

Raist3d: Fuji, I love your other Xtrans cameras, but this is not it. This is an XF1 rebadged (the concept, not literally). Um.... no.

yup, it even says EXRCMOS under sensor type in the specs. Probably a typo. Even if its a rebadged XF1, I like it. And its not as if this is a new thing to do. All manufacturers have rebadged products with slightly new specs.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2013 at 05:40 UTC
On Nikon D610 preview (627 comments in total)
In reply to:

JimWongyyz: After reading comments here. This forum becomes a PR nightmare for Nikon. Instead of talking about D610, this forum becomes oil frustration resentment forum.
I suppose full frame customers are big spenders compare to DX buyers. The last thing Nikon should not do is to pizz off full frame Nikon customers.

What Nikon should have done :
1) give extended warranty on D600.
2) or a discount voucher on future purchase of a Nikon camera.

If I were a D600 user, I would be mad. Most likely 2nd hand D600 would take a big hit with this new model.

Yes the lens didn't fit anymore. ;)

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 17:38 UTC
On Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 review article (187 comments in total)
In reply to:

evogt500: Question: According to the specs, it uses 1/1.7" sensor with a total of 12.7 detected sensors. However Output is 10.1 MP. What is the actual size of the sensor that the light hits? Is panasonic doing a Canon trick that they did with the 520 HS, where they use a 16MP 1/2.33" sensor but its actually a 10.1 MP 1/3" sensor?

Thank you both for the input.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2012 at 17:43 UTC
On Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 review article (187 comments in total)

Question: According to the specs, it uses 1/1.7" sensor with a total of 12.7 detected sensors. However Output is 10.1 MP. What is the actual size of the sensor that the light hits? Is panasonic doing a Canon trick that they did with the 520 HS, where they use a 16MP 1/2.33" sensor but its actually a 10.1 MP 1/3" sensor?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2012 at 09:51 UTC as 37th comment | 3 replies
On Novoflex creates adapters for Fujifilm X-Pro1 article (36 comments in total)

How will the hybrid viewfinder cope with all these lenses?

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2012 at 22:33 UTC as 3rd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

evogt500: What ever happened to quality control? Fuji, canon and now nikon.

Doesn't matter. They need to do testing in all conditions before they sell. All they care about now is getting the product out first before the conpetition. I guess you must work for one of those companies.

Direct link | Posted on May 5, 2012 at 08:20 UTC

What ever happened to quality control? Fuji, canon and now nikon.

Direct link | Posted on May 5, 2012 at 06:43 UTC as 26th comment | 5 replies

Good job Fuji. Now if only you could have done some R&D from the start...

Direct link | Posted on Apr 26, 2012 at 03:45 UTC as 118th comment

If fuji replaces all the sensors affected, i applaud them.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 12, 2012 at 20:10 UTC as 140th comment

The IXUS 500 (10.1 MP) actually used a 1/2.3" 16MP sensor but cropped. effectively making it a 1/3" sensor ( the area which actually recieves light). Is it the same with the camera?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 2, 2012 at 05:16 UTC as 3rd comment | 2 replies

Stop adding Megapixels!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 28, 2012 at 04:17 UTC as 55th comment | 10 replies
Total: 47, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »