unotisto

unotisto

Joined on Nov 29, 2011

Comments

Total: 34, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On CES 2013: Hands-on with Samsung NX300 article (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

Karl Summers: Sorry I missed it. I was at the LG booth checking out their vacuum.

Oh my sides, Karl!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2013 at 13:52 UTC
On Just Posted: Pentax MX-1 hands-on preview article (173 comments in total)
In reply to:

Clint Dunn: So they make a great looking P&S and then tack on a cheap looking tiltable screen....ughh. Am I the only one who doesn't want a tilting screen on my camera?? So much unnecessary depth added to the camera.

"Am I the only one who doesn't want a tilting screen on my camera?"
No, you're not.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2013 at 17:25 UTC
On Just posted: Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM lens review article (182 comments in total)

How nice. Now there's hardly anything to complain about on DPR, now that nobody can say they don't review anything/review only superzooms.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 21, 2012 at 19:16 UTC as 45th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Jman13: Where do you put your thumb?

I would imagine that this was designed by the phone folks...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 20:28 UTC
In reply to:

cesaregal: More reliable than a camera phone in my opinion:
- glass lens (6 elements in 5 groups)
- electronic VR
- contrast-detect TTL AF
- macro close-up
- ISO 80-1600
- exposure compensation +/- 2 EV
- 190 shots per charge
- 7,3 GB internal memory.
Look at samples: http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/coolpix/style/s01/sample.htm

Galaxy S (the 'ancient' first one):
Plastic lenses (I guess)
Electronic VR
CD TTL AF
Macro close-up
ISO 100-800
Exp. comp. +/- 2EV
1000+ shots per charge
8GB internal memory.

Not that bad I'd say...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 24, 2012 at 08:40 UTC
In reply to:

Ross the Fidller: Oh No! Not another X camera! ;)

Actually, it looks like they're trying to attract people that couldn't afford the OM-D (silver model) with some identifiable similarities. Why not go with the 'look' if it helps sales. :)

I think the X-5 should remind you of the silver K-5 ;)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 24, 2012 at 08:30 UTC
In reply to:

unotisto: What's with copying Pentax all of a sudden?

Actually, I was talking about the 40/2.8 XS (which is anorexic compared to this, although it does not have an AF motor). Pentax also has a 40/2.8 Limited, which is in another class (build quality and design).

EDIT: and the design is called Tessar and was invented by a guy working for Zeiss (surprise surprise) in 1902.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 9, 2012 at 12:08 UTC

What's with copying Pentax all of a sudden?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 8, 2012 at 13:53 UTC as 50th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

arpikusz: This is the best looking Pentax camera ever! Blue looks awesome!
Now they just need to come out with a DSLR for $499. :)

The K-r is available here for 499€.

Direct link | Posted on May 22, 2012 at 13:20 UTC
On Pentax launches smc DA 50mm F1.8 for APS-C cameras article (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

arpikusz: Why can't Pentax sell this lens for $150? Both Nikon and Canon has 50mm 1.8 lenses for around $100-$150...

Anton, you're kidding, right?

Direct link | Posted on May 22, 2012 at 13:13 UTC
On Pentax launches smc DA 50mm F1.8 for APS-C cameras article (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

locke_fc: What I don't get is why all manufacturers insist on releasing 50mm lenses for APS-C bodies.
The 50mm has all reason to be for FF, as it approaches the normal angle of view. In APS-C though, it's pointless. The equivalent 75mm is neither here nor there: too short for portrait, too long for walk around and general purpose shooting.

So why this fixed mentality that APS-C needs a fast 50mm? I don't get it. Anyone looking for a portrait lens on cropped sensors would better served by a 60-70mm lens.

Like Nawknai said, they're darn cheap to make. Most designs are tried and true, so you don't need to invest much into optical design. And if you ARE starting from scratch, you only need to design half the lens.

Direct link | Posted on May 22, 2012 at 13:11 UTC

I don't get it why people are so upset. It's a very KISS approach.

Direct link | Posted on May 5, 2012 at 07:26 UTC as 9th comment | 1 reply
On Nikon D3200 preview (181 comments in total)
In reply to:

MiLei: I did not see its crop factor.

Sensor is APS but 1.2 or 1.5 or what. I know it now, but it should have in the preview, shouldn't it?

Every aps Nikon has a 1.5 crop factor.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 28, 2012 at 17:35 UTC

Well done. Searching for "K-5" actually gets you Pentax K-5 and not Canon 5D.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2012 at 21:04 UTC as 25th comment
On Canon acknowledges 'light leak' in the EOS 5D Mark III article (257 comments in total)
In reply to:

treepop: Where is the review?

You people are so darn impatient.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 18, 2012 at 02:45 UTC
On Just Posted: Sigma SD1 / SD1 Merrill review article (374 comments in total)
In reply to:

Faintandfuzzy: It's 3x15mp....no 15x3mp

It's (15x3)mp

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2012 at 17:47 UTC
On Sigma USA announces pricing of 50-150mm F2.8 OS HSM article (105 comments in total)
In reply to:

zstan: Why no Sony mount? :(

Exactly. But if Sigma started selling the previous version again...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 31, 2012 at 10:58 UTC
On Samsung doesn't deny Android-based camera article (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

D1N0: They alteady have crappy camera's with android. They're called Galaxy. You can even call with them.

Do you mind listing the model you make claims on?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 15, 2012 at 17:23 UTC
On Samsung doesn't deny Android-based camera article (108 comments in total)

I'm interested in the battery life of something like this. You'd need a very capable processor for something like this. The 800mhz ARM comes to mind, but then we'll begin to measure the battery life in hours again, not clicks.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 15, 2012 at 17:21 UTC as 14th comment
On Samsung doesn't deny Android-based camera article (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cy Cheze: Where is tha Samsung Tegra 3 tablet? Several Android tablet makers promised 4-core tablets to compete with the new iPad 3, but why are none for sale? There is only the Asus Transformer Prime, with its bad speaker and hobbled GPS. Why does Samsung have 4G trouble with FFC while Apple does not? Wither Acer, Toshiba, or Lenovo? Why the postponements until July or later? Delays until October, just for the sake of Windows 8? Troubles with ICS and Jelly Bean? If no other contestants show up at the race, Apple will win by default.

Agree with first poster, but @audijam: Still haven't gotten over the 1DX, eh? Does everyone reallllllllllllllllllllllllllllly have to b*tch about things that they don't like?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 15, 2012 at 17:12 UTC
Total: 34, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »