Lives in France France
Joined on Oct 13, 2005


Total: 132, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »


Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2014 at 18:08 UTC as 85th comment
In reply to:

Retzius: They are still "studying demand" for a D300 successor?

translation - if the 7D Mk II does good then we have to make one too, but we are too scared to launch our product first because then some executive in the company would have to commit hari kari if it sells poorly

they missed,
I was waiting too, moved now, as many ..
sorry ...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2014 at 18:06 UTC
In reply to:

photoway: Hi,
On my side, as à "Pro" photographer... the D750 is not exactly matching my needs to replace my D700 's
I was hopping to have the D4S sensor in the D800 Body... with all "PRO Specs" packaged inside (like Almost the D700 was in regard to the D3)
(Not need a fragile, flip screen,... but Need a 1/8000 sync and 1/250 (320) flash Sync)

and I need 2 lighter (and cheaper) bodies to carry arround ( than the D4's)
Please Nikon, please....!

On the possible "D400" side, Still Waiting too, for my familly photos to a real good replacement for the D300s

Richard -
(have a look at my new gallery : http://www.photoway.com/photos/


Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2014 at 18:04 UTC
In reply to:

princecody: How does the IQ of this compare to the Fuji X100T? Why no viewfinder built in or included?

repeat it again one more time, and perhaps it will become truth .... :)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 04:38 UTC
On Panasonic unveils Lumix DMC-GM5 with EVF article (42 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: I would gladly pay $899 for a 12-37mm F1.7-F2.8 M4/3 lens. Luckily they throw in a free camera body with it if you get the LX100. I can’t fathom buying the GM5 over the LX100 unless they also announce that great lens for m4/3s interchangeable lens cameras.

Built-in flash No

should had the include external flash

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 11:23 UTC
On Hands-on with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 article (234 comments in total)
In reply to:

JBurnett: Yay, EVF! I know young'uns often don't care, but we who need reading glasses to properly see the LCD applaud this addition.

yes, for some

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 14:14 UTC
On Zeiss introduces 'no distortion' Otus 1.4/85mm article (336 comments in total)
In reply to:

nerd2: Except it's 2014 and we can fix distortion in software, and we have good enough high ISO so that we can stop down.

and you can use gaussian blur, and sharpening and ... ?????

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2014 at 17:56 UTC
On Ricoh expands Q series with Pentax Q-S1 article (362 comments in total)
In reply to:

datiswous: I think not able to use a viewfinder (internal or via add-on) on a system camera kind of sucks, even if 80% of potential buyers won't need it. Even on high-end compacts this becomes kind of standard.

and this OVF as no diopter adjustment despite it's price, unusable ..

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2014 at 07:27 UTC
On DSC_8830 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

look clean for 2800 and 36Mpx,
very good at 12Mpx

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2014 at 09:46 UTC as 1st comment

No Sony .......

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2014 at 07:27 UTC as 35th comment
In reply to:

otoklikBG: One thing to keep in mind is that inside A7s is sensor meant for Video cameras, not still photography. It's at video that it really shines. Fact that this also makes stills this good is a great bonus to the Sony name.
That said, I am Sony fan(boy) and ditched canon for them because they tickle my gadget itch more than anyone else. Sony is at their best when they let their engineers run rampant and create all kind of thing. from Betamax and Walkman to this day they always improved and innovated (even if some standards lost their advantages really quickly like MemoryStick which speed got overtaken withing 12 months). But at the same time I feel like they are innovating themselves into corner and with so many new and innovative camera's and sensors (including announced curved ones) thy can't keep up with lenses. Especially compared to Caninkon competition. Also, their lenses, by economy of scale, tend to be more expensive while not being quite as good.

1/8th s shot on theatre performance, they are all on a seat?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 3, 2014 at 06:08 UTC

Yes !
was waiting this news for 6 monthes :)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 1, 2014 at 07:02 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

Lawrencew: Next step is to dynamically adjust the curvature in camera, so that it is optimised for the focal length chosen by the photographer.

If they can do in body stabilization by moving the sensor, and now build curved TVs where the curvature can be altered, then it wont be long before they can alter the curvature of the sensor in camera too...

(where's the Patent Office btw :-) )

to late :)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 09:36 UTC

Will be fine to be able to change the curvature of the sensor with piezzo stress,
to adapt to different lense, even "flatfield lenses"

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 08:31 UTC as 102nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ScottRH: And the real question, What can you tell us about a D700 replacement?

To late for me .... went away, sorry

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2014 at 12:12 UTC
On Leica M Monochrom now available in grayscale (sort of) article (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

VikingPhotographer: Back in the good old days of celloidfilm cameras nearly all the cameras of all brands was in "chrome" with black "leather", the black models came fx in Hasselblad because of small faults in the chrome, so in a way the were never first choice at the time. Then the black versions became popular for some press photographers and black became more popular, but it was still chrome versions that was first choice. At the time where plastic became more and more the most used material for camera bodies, then black became the norme, not because they were more popular, no because chrome was to diffucult to look nice in plastic ! I must admit that chrome plastic looks very cheap compared to real metal chrome ! But take a look at a Hasselblad chrome, it just look so nice ! The new - still much too expensive - Leica in chrome look cheap and depressed. At the price of a Leica, I would rather but a Fuji X-serie plus a Canon 5D, plus a Sony, plus a...

Depends which begining for good old day!.
as for 35mm celluloid,
First Leica I, II et II where black+nikel, no chrome
first Retina where balack

Direct link | Posted on May 26, 2014 at 11:32 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (660 comments in total)

Where is the finder ?

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2014 at 06:53 UTC as 121st comment | 2 replies
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2301 comments in total)

The mount is FF !
:) :) :)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 07:06 UTC as 478th comment
On 1991 Nikon-Kodak hack was first DSLR in space article (67 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: Quote:

"DCS system, the first commercially available digital camera."

I'm pretty sure that Sony had a digital camera which was commercially available in the 1980s. No, not a DSLR.

No just a Sony prototype in 80's
Sony first Mavica commercially available was 2nd part of 90's.
The writer should say " DSLR" instead of camera.
First commercially available was the very expensive Canon RC-701
than you had a " pretty affordable" Canon Ion in 1988.

1st Digital camera prototype known, is Kodak in 1975

Direct link | Posted on Apr 19, 2014 at 16:13 UTC
In reply to:

VaLeX: I'd love this camera with a non-detachable 27-95 F2 lens, with zoom controls like the Fuji X20, a bit of grip and a minimal optic viewfinder. ..

buy an X20 ?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2014 at 05:50 UTC
Total: 132, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »