Wow !What a cool garage ... ! :)
Stigg: hmm, no matter the weather you just keep taking boring snapshots. even antsy bad-breath adams could make more interesting mediocre shots than these. try throwing your camera at some rocks or off a cliff. they'll definitely be more lively than your usual.
hmmm, boring unintersting comment, threw your keyboard against the wall, it will definitely be better than your usual.http://www.dpreview.com/members/296810275/comments
vscd: I don't understand why Nikon doesn't use the number 5400 for it. The 5xxx is not unlimited with numbers and I think the series will go on for some more years ;)
That's why no D400 :) :)
m43er: That cat photo sold me...I want one.
You want a cat ?
Cane: Why does Sony let Zeis make almost all their FE lenses. It's like Ford having Ferrari make all their engines. Just because a camera is FF doesn't mean only $1000 + lenses are the only thing you should attach to it.
Maybe this is such a great plan that Canon should follow and only sell L lenses.
The 35 1.4 was annouced before,but you're right I didn't see they put it in the list;)
le_alain: Thanks !as startup time with an FE lense on A7 is 3x the start-up time with a legacy lenseOn A7II the startup time is better , around half the A7
No, on A7 series, before update, it makes near 3s to boot with an FE lense. Try it with a chrono ;)on A7 II it's far quicker
Heuuuu none of the FE lenses announced today are Zeiss .....
Thanks !as startup time with an FE lense on A7 is 3x the start-up time with a legacy lenseOn A7II the startup time is better , around half the A7
Fogsprig: Epson R-D you again?
Ok for the CMOSIS Sensor ;)
Good alternative, even if I had preferd an Epson R-D with an A7 sensor, Epson wich doesn't need at all to switch LCD on for any setting, even ISO or exposure compensation.
adhemar: Oh my, oh my, a compact 24-600mm and a 1" sensor. And quite bright, I am sure. The laws of physics have stopped applying.
But only for fixed lens cameras. Isn't that weird?
"With a fixed lens they can adjust for the optical aberrations with software more easily." why ?
sharkcookie: 8% wider than the Nikon 12-24, but the Nikon is twice as fast (one stop equals double the light). The Canon is 50% more expensive.
you give one yourself.You can like it or not, but don't say there is no other FF lense in th 11-13mm range.and you didn't say "zoom" at that time, You can had CV12mm wich works great on Leica and Sony A7 séries, but of course not on DSLR.
Only ??? Nofor Canon DSLR yes
Couscousdelight: And today Samsung presents it first Organic Sensor :http://image-sensors-world.blogspot.fr/2015/02/samsung-presents-organic-on-si-cmos.html
Fuji/Panasonic in 2013http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n130611.htmlbut not in the same way
le_alain: ISO 16000 is very good on first picture;)
So DPR change the 1st photo of conclusion from ISO 16000 to ISO 2000.but quite good to for ISO 2000;)
ISO 16000 is very good on first picture;)
ozturert: Well, Sony needs to remove all AA filters ASAP. These samples are way too soft. Even the ones with Zeiss 55mm. Actually they need to switch to something like Faveon to remove that "smoggy-smudgy" look. I'm saying this to all, Canon-Nikon-Sony-Pentax etc..
as an A7 owner, not so different sensor wise,NR at base ISO and not AA filter faultDetails can be incredible with raw conversiotn and a sharp prime;)
stevez: I like that you've shown a large variety of images with different lighting, lenses and exposure combinations. CA is virtually nonexistent at least to my eye. Colors are very natural although I'm not overly impressed with the level of detail, mostly in low contrast areas. I suspect that may be the JPEG engine?
yes it definitively looks like Sony's jpeg engine.Y'oull have more details in raw, , especially textures
JoePhoto: I think these are terrible images ... (not the cameras fault) !!!
Were they shot by a 2-year old ???
The WIRE in the sunset shot ??? give me a break
With such comments, give me a break too !
Thanks DPRsamples are here to judge a camera not a photographer.and you can make wonderful artistic pictures with the worst camera phone.;)
ealvarez: Is this manual focus lens? $599? I can get 135mm f2L canon for about $600 used and Nikon 180 f2.8D even cheaper used.. I don't share much of the enthusiasm. Maybe I would if I was Sony E-mount shooter.
@justyntime Canon is far better in the 1st test and Samyang in the second