ZiggyDeath

Yes. Also, the LV autofocus is better in both speed and accuracy on the SL1.

Nope, I meant for stills. The day I brought home my SL1, I tested it by shooting both it and a T4i at a brown leather couch as the center target and a table in the background in low-light with a...

I was wondering if you gave the SL1/100D any thought. I have both the T4i and SL1, and the SL1 manages to lock focus more consistently and accurately in low light with both phase and contrast...

Could have been user error. I have plenty of tools I can use to fiddle with it, although in this case I'd rather now. Plus, I do enough fiddling with electronics while working, I'm really not in...

The lens certainly looks like it compares favorably against the 70-300L, despite the 1000$ price difference. But it falls short of the 70-200; although at 250, it look like it's sharper than the...

I had bought the lens before seeing this review. I had freaked out and then ran my lens through a battery of tests and found that it did not exhibit this problem. The lens was bought in Japan in...

Anything where I need that much reach, I'll probably just focus to infinity. Lack of AF isn't a concern when I push the lens past 200mm. I considered this as a intermediary lens, but have since...

I hadn't realized that Kenko TCs pretty much work with any lens. I will almost certainly pick up a 1.4x to compliment my 2x Canon.

I thought when the camera registered more than f/5.6 it turned off the autofocus, with a f/8.0 limit on the 5D3 and 1-Series. Since the DGX series correctly communicates the change in FL and...

I could be mistakened, but I read somewhere that the rotation mechanism isn't nearly as smooth and is overly tight. Regardless, I'd probably get a Canon even if I'm being bent over the proverbial...

Sooo... basically the SL1 can AF @ F8 without using LV... awesome?

From the landscape pictures I've seen, the 100mm 2.8L is amazingly sharp. Also, the main contenders at this point are both zooms, so while it might not be as good as a prime (which I don't believe...

I can in fact go out and get a replacement 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, I'm looking to have a kit which I can take with me everywhere - the 70-200 stays at home most of the time due to the "size and...

If I were to go with a lens like the 70-300 DO I'd be at 5.6 or 5.0 for the 70-300L at 100mm. The 100f/2.8L seems much more sharp than the 70-300L @ 100mm f/4.0 (when looking at APS-C comparisons,...

Luckily I don't cover sports, hell I don't even like to look at sports. And if something pops up and I need to be fast, I probably wouldn't be able to catch it anyways - or rely on my current...

While the 300 F4L IS is a fair bit lighter than the 70-200 2.8 II, the older IS kind of puts it into the same category as the 100-400L. I don't have the confidence to use something like that on a...

I took a look at the specs and it's a bit heavier than the 70-200 F4L IS. Given the almost certainty that I'll attach some kind of TC, the lack of IS is pretty much a no-go. If it had IS at the...

It really is fairly up to date. The control on that Mitsui Seiki indicate it's probably only 20 years old at the most. And the Mitsubishi EDMs, less than 10 years old (actually probably more like 5...

It really is fairly up to date. The control on that Mitsui Seiki indicate it's probably only 20 years old at the most (it looks like it's a late 90s early 00, I can't tell for sure from the...

So I was researching into potentially getting some Kenko teleconverter. Everything seemed to point towards getting a Teleplus Pro 300 DGX and that I should avoid the MC series, until I started to...