well it wont be getting my monies to expensive I'm sure there's better out there and cheaper a lot cheaperTom G
Michael Ma: 99000 pounds. Sounds about right.
Far to cheap at that giveaway priceTom G
sakisda: The big dissapointment of a6000 was the sound of shutter. It was like Nikon's. Everyone near you realizes you're taking pictures. I hope this pronlem has been corrected in a5100. It's a major disadvantage for street photography
Such Violence, all over a photoTom G
way overpricedTom G
Independence for Scotland
tom1234567: Nothing One can not do with a Pentax K3 the Photos were just ordinarysome nice shots but as I say nothing spectacular just photos any armature photographer could have taken themTom G
OH MY I made a spelling mistakeeee it should have been amateur so sorry to offend you perfectionists.the man whom never made a mistake never made anythingas I say one could have done these photos with a Pentax K3no need to spend £3000 G, on a upgraded Nikon Tom
Nothing One can not do with a Pentax K3 the Photos were just ordinarysome nice shots but as I say nothing spectacular just photos any armature photographer could have taken themTom G
If the sold at a cheaper/reasonable price they would sell moremy opinion??????Tom G
The Monkey takes better photos than some on here??????????
consumers will buy these cameras and realize they aren’t much better than their phones
Some people are just Jealous I can see that by some of the snide commentsTom G
If this has been a Nikon or Canon, update it would not have been posted 10 days after it came out???????????????????Tom G
WHERE is the Pentax K3
There are more cameras than NIKON on the market does DP- review no thatin the news section there are 4ref: to Nikon,810.only thing about Nikon is there after sales service is crap,look at the length of time it takes them to admit a fault in the 600
Nothing to fuss about
just looks like damaged photos, not even art,small minds are easy amused
Not as good as the Pentax K3 which offers a lot more value for the moniesits not worth £2700 or $3299not even worth a quarter of that,
Not worth the monies total rip of from Nikon 3299$ not worth a quarter of that,souped up d800Pentax K3 is a better camera
Not as good as the Pentax K3 in low light
No 4 for me
Kodachrome200: I am curious what Waltons could be claiming. Unless the photographer signed something give them the rights witch it seems they didnt they dont have a leg to stand on
just give them one billion dollars, and they can have them,simple?????????
InTheMist: I just got the old TC-14E II. I wonder if its worth upgrading.
Just a side note, the new price on the 400/2.8 is $3k more than before.
Still doesn't justified the cost