borno

borno

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Nov 25, 2006

Comments

Total: 20, showing: 1 – 20
On article Lens shootout: Sony RX10 III destroys the competition (472 comments in total)
In reply to:

gordzam: 600mm shots shot with the Canon G3 X clearly show a lot of heat distortion when viewed at full res that the Sony pics don't show. Are these shot deliberately much later in the day to degrade the perceived better quality of the Sony? Honestly, I can only spot a very slight advantage at full aperture of the Sony lens, which will not be visible when viewing the whole photo. All 3 cameras are on par, and very good, and I would not make a decision on image quality if I had to choose between these 3 cams.

they were taken on different days in different conditions. I agree that a better test would be closer (and in the same conditions)

Link | Posted on May 28, 2016 at 19:38 UTC
On article Lens shootout: Sony RX10 III destroys the competition (472 comments in total)
In reply to:

borno: the lens comparison should be done at the same time because the heat waves are bad for the canon, kind of bad for the sony and clear for the panasonic. IMO

Heat waves, shimmer or whatever. It is not the same for the three cameras just look at the pictures at max zoom. It is obvious and doesn't have to be hot outside to mess with a telephoto shot either. Air currents will do it also. Not a good test IMO

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 13:35 UTC
On article Lens shootout: Sony RX10 III destroys the competition (472 comments in total)

the lens comparison should be done at the same time because the heat waves are bad for the canon, kind of bad for the sony and clear for the panasonic. IMO

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 08:58 UTC as 78th comment | 4 replies
On article 2016 Roundup: Compact Enthusiast Zoom Cameras (284 comments in total)

The G1x ii looks better in the studio scene than the others.jm2c

Link | Posted on May 2, 2016 at 09:21 UTC as 22nd comment
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (681 comments in total)
In reply to:

borno: Setting AF for focus priority would probably give more priority to the focus. (pg.418)

Isn't that a good thing?

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2016 at 23:17 UTC
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (681 comments in total)

Setting AF for focus priority would probably give more priority to the focus. (pg.418)

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2016 at 22:25 UTC as 128th comment | 7 replies
On article Nikon's New D5 and D500 Push the Boundaries of DSLR (737 comments in total)

Ill wait for the D510 : )

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2016 at 10:20 UTC as 77th comment | 2 replies
On article Canon EOS 5DS R sample gallery updated (161 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wedding photographer: It is interesting why bokeh is sliced on 1C3A5614?

cat's eye Bokeh is because of a fast lens wide open and vignetting in the lens. Some like it, some don't. : )

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2015 at 08:58 UTC
On article Nikon D750 flare investigated: Why we're not worried (352 comments in total)

I don't think testing two of anything would show if there is a real problem that is much worse for some other bodies. Looks to me like you could just do a mirror lock up and check the af sensor. If it sticks up, send it back for a good one. My first dslr (pentax k10d) had a bad flash capacitor fry the main board. I loved the second one they sent me. : )

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2015 at 11:12 UTC as 45th comment | 1 reply
On article Pentax 645Z added to studio comparison database (141 comments in total)
In reply to:

zakaria: It is pentax answer to any one asking for a full frame.

keep telling yourself that.

Link | Posted on Nov 17, 2014 at 22:12 UTC
In reply to:

String: Such typical DPR reader comments; If you like the upcoming Zuiko glass, your a fan boy. If your a Canikon shooter, they are a waste of money and you are an idiot for buying anything other than FF.

Hilarious!

Ditto : )

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2014 at 19:01 UTC
On article Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion (502 comments in total)

nice shots on your website. : )

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2014 at 15:35 UTC as 34th comment
On photo little blue heron with frog in the Birds on Water - 2 challenge (4 comments in total)
In reply to:

ysal: Fantastic shot

Thanks ysal. : )

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2014 at 09:53 UTC
On photo little blue heron with frog in the Birds on Water - 2 challenge (4 comments in total)
In reply to:

jaykumarr: fantastic shot.. gentle lighting.. what lens was used?

Thanks, I was using a 300mm f4 is and a 1.4xii extender

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2014 at 09:52 UTC

You should have zoomed out a little...Just saying : )

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2014 at 18:22 UTC as 9th comment
On article Canon updates firmware for EOS-1D X (72 comments in total)

Ignore must only work in the forums

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2014 at 01:58 UTC as 10th comment
On article Phase One releases Capture One Express 7 (12 comments in total)

happy day! I've been waiting for this one for a v6 upgrade. I really liked the pro7, but don't need the tethering and what-not.

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2013 at 01:00 UTC as 13th comment

Thank you all for the kind comments : )

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2012 at 10:39 UTC as 2nd comment
On Challenge:7526 (42 comments in total)
In reply to:

William Woodruff: Indeed, this is a photo site, not a religious one. That was true until the attacks began on the host. When a challenge topic is "sexy," should we protest that this is a photo site, not a cheesecake site? "Ferraris" -- nope, not an auto site. "City of La Habana?" Nope, not a travel site. Cockpits? No, not about aviation. Etc.

Further, while it is true that there are many religious assertions that are, or appear to be, incorrect. Does it necessarily follow that all aspects of all religions are invalidated? Shall we apply the same logic to the sciences? Oops. In the end, there is no real conflict between science and religion. Scientific study is man's attempt to answer the question, "How?" Religious study is man's attempt to answer the question, "Why?" Both are important questions that warrant serious consideration.

In the meantime, why don't we let the host present a topic for interpretation, without the bickering.

Now I'm out of here, you may have the last word.

Science and experience will affirm, order never comes from disorder, or random chance. Who is blind here?

Posted on Nov 25, 2012 at 17:49 UTC

Thank you for the download Uwe! It looks like a very good book.: )

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2011 at 19:38 UTC as 150th comment
Total: 20, showing: 1 – 20