zakaria: It is pentax answer to any one asking for a full frame.
keep telling yourself that.
String: Such typical DPR reader comments; If you like the upcoming Zuiko glass, your a fan boy. If your a Canikon shooter, they are a waste of money and you are an idiot for buying anything other than FF.
Ditto : )
nice shots on your website. : )
ysal: Fantastic shot
Thanks ysal. : )
jaykumarr: fantastic shot.. gentle lighting.. what lens was used?
Thanks, I was using a 300mm f4 is and a 1.4xii extender
You should have zoomed out a little...Just saying : )
Ignore must only work in the forums
happy day! I've been waiting for this one for a v6 upgrade. I really liked the pro7, but don't need the tethering and what-not.
Thank you all for the kind comments : )
William Woodruff: Indeed, this is a photo site, not a religious one. That was true until the attacks began on the host. When a challenge topic is "sexy," should we protest that this is a photo site, not a cheesecake site? "Ferraris" -- nope, not an auto site. "City of La Habana?" Nope, not a travel site. Cockpits? No, not about aviation. Etc.
Further, while it is true that there are many religious assertions that are, or appear to be, incorrect. Does it necessarily follow that all aspects of all religions are invalidated? Shall we apply the same logic to the sciences? Oops. In the end, there is no real conflict between science and religion. Scientific study is man's attempt to answer the question, "How?" Religious study is man's attempt to answer the question, "Why?" Both are important questions that warrant serious consideration.
In the meantime, why don't we let the host present a topic for interpretation, without the bickering.
Now I'm out of here, you may have the last word.
Science and experience will affirm, order never comes from disorder, or random chance. Who is blind here?
Thank you for the download Uwe! It looks like a very good book.: )