D1N0: What would we say when Nikon would target snipers in a marketing campaign? Blow out the infidels brains from a safe distance of 1.5 miles with the new Nikon head shot targeting scope.
What would we say when Nikon would target snipers in a marketing campaign?
I would think when bidding on military contracts they do exactly that.
Phil M Winder: Perhaps Land Rover and Toyota should be blamed as well.
Dear SosmixNOT SO, ONE CAN NOW ENGAGE IN DART HUNTING. This involves close proximity stalking and darting the prey with tranquilizer. Then photos can be taken with the prey unconscious.then it is revived with antidote and allowed to escape. This is more dangerous for the hunter and in fact somewhat levels the playing field. The hunter has to get within 30 yds to ensure success, pretty close when hunting white Rhino.
D7100 Looks like an incremental improvement, BUT, when are these guys going to recognize that the photography ends at the sensor. ie, the glass and the exposure values, focusing VR etc all end up at the sensor. After that it is all "IT". Processing, noise reduction, Bayer algorithms. Features such as GPS, wireless. pano stitching, and on and on would be much more useful. There is little advantage with pixel count now that we are at the limit where the sensor resolution matches the glass in front. I vote for additional "IT" features, some of which haven't even been thought of yet.I'm just saying.....
Well I can speak from some experience as I use the original 80-400 almost daily. do about 60% of my shooting with it on an old D300. Shoot scenery, closeups, BIF, people, etc. I find this lens to be extremely versatile. I really like is the bokeh on long shots for detailed isolation. This lens has a personality of sorts that takes a bit of practice to master, tricks to overcome the slower focusing and some time to get used to wide zoom range, But I found it worth the effort.The 300 is only a 12Mp so the the 80-400 easily handles that. last year I tested it out at the local photo shop on a d7000 with 70-200 2.8 I also own and the 80-400 gave better long shot results because it can get in closer. and thus preserves more detail, even though the 200 has better specs. Perhaps a D7100 will test the limits. For me the original version removes all doubt, this format was a winner and I anticipate this iteration wil continue the tradition. But then I'm just an amature.
jezkasdad: Is this sponsored by the CIA?
Most likely by the Eye atoola
Shunda77: Gee whiz, Nikon are even more than a generation ahead of Canon now. Catch up is becoming harder with every new release it would seem.
"Vibration Reduction (VR) - Nikon (produced the first optical stabilized lens, a 38-105mm f/4-7.8 zoom built into the Nikon Zoom 700VR (US: Zoom-Touch 105 VR) camera in 1994)"Source Wikipedia
Get with the picture mate
FNG303: Michael Caine played a better Alfie than Jude Law, don't you think ?
I see That FNG303 saysThis user has chosen not to disclose their email address
With good reason
Another disgruntled QC nationalist seeking to disparage Canada with a bit of nasty left wing humor.What not enough handouts from the west yet...?
Sophomoric hunour? I thought the subject was pride as in vanity, not stupidity.P.
Great shot. Either you have one long lens or two long legs.Shouda been #1 in my book!
Nice picture. However is that one picker wearing some kind of animal constume?