Peter62

Peter62

Lives in Germany Germany
Joined on Sep 26, 2010

Comments

Total: 30, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Samsung Galaxy S5 camera review post (85 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peter62: Sorry, but the Galaxy S4 is BETTER!

Look for yourself at the studio scene image comparison, low light, then look at the coloured, concentric cirlcles !

Another reason not to buy the S5!

I watched almost every detail, to me it seems that the S5 is not better than the S4.

In the lower right corner the S4 is clearly sharper. All in all, it could be a tie.

And the iPhone 5s is better than both Samsungs.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2014 at 12:34 UTC
On Samsung Galaxy S5 camera review post (85 comments in total)

Sorry, but the Galaxy S4 is BETTER!

Look for yourself at the studio scene image comparison, low light, then look at the coloured, concentric cirlcles !

Another reason not to buy the S5!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2014 at 12:16 UTC as 20th comment | 4 replies
On Nikon 1 V3: Real-world Sample Images article (175 comments in total)

What a major step BACKWARDS for Nikon!

This camera is made for beginners, but costs more than most semi-pro DSLRs!

Nikon, where are you going? Believe me: next year this 1V3 will be sold for € 299 - including the lens!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 9, 2014 at 16:35 UTC as 33rd comment | 3 replies
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2301 comments in total)

It's a fantastic piece of art! And you can work with it - now! And you can make real money with it - even many years from now in the future!

A masterpiece!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 18:27 UTC as 433rd comment
On Fujifilm X-T1 Review preview (583 comments in total)

Buy the X-A1, get the same image quality.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 10:58 UTC as 81st comment | 4 replies
On Fujifilm X-T1 Review preview (583 comments in total)

Quote: " The camera's DR modes also help you make the most of the sensor's impressive dynamic range."

The X-T1's dynamic range is FAR from being impressive! In fact, DR is VERY poor, compared to Nikon D7100 or almost any other comparable camera!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 07:31 UTC as 87th comment | 1 reply
On Nikon D4s First Impressions Review preview (1047 comments in total)
In reply to:

rwbaron: It appears Nikon has cleaned up the RAW performance by a good half stop compared the D4 which is admirable. I would say 409,600 D4S is not quite as good as 204,800 on D4 but close. I also looked for the 1DX to compare but alas not on the list so I took the 6D and wow, I had no idea the 6D was that good at low light high ISO shooting. Very close to the D4S at 102,400. This is good news for all of us regardless of brand.

There is absolutely NO difference to the D4.
That's a fact.

Actually, every cheap Fuji comes extremely close. Go to Low Light, ISO 25600, point to the colored 6 circles and compare with the cheap X-M1 or the even cheaper X-A1.

There is a very, very small difference. But at what price?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 20, 2014 at 18:02 UTC
On Nikon D4s First Impressions Review preview (1047 comments in total)

Absolutely no visible difference to D4. In fact, the Fuji X-A1 is only very slightly worse than the D4s.

Disappointing.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2014 at 09:52 UTC as 105th comment | 2 replies
On Nikon Df preview (2817 comments in total)

Try this:

Go to "Studio Comparison (low light)" and select the SONY NEX-3N to compare with the Df, D610 and Alpha 7.

Select ISO 12800.

Watch!

So, why buy a camera for 3000 bucks, when a € 300 camera comes THIS close!??

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2013 at 17:51 UTC as 34th comment | 4 replies
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zigmont: I guess I'm the only one who thinks this obsession with the past, i.e. "retro" is absurd. I'm old enough to remember the Nikon F's in the '60's, I don't want a camera that looks like that, I want something new and modern that breaks the old barriers.

Retro design is an excuse for companies who have no new ideas and can't come up with a new and ground-breaking design, so they go back to the past.

Quite frankly, I'm sick of all the new "retro" look cameras. I want the camera of 2020, not 1950.

@Zigmont: Good point!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 21:48 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)
In reply to:

photogeek: What Nikon needs right now is both APS-C and full-frame mirrorless cameras, with much smaller and lighter bodies and lenses. Not this retro BS that weighs 10 pounds with a decent lens on it.

Mirrorless or not - that has nothing to do with low light performance!

It's a fact: DSLRs with mirror are a thing of the past. Actually they are dead.

Someone should tell Nikon and Canon, before they are gone...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 21:46 UTC

So boring...just another cash cow for Canon?

Nothing new since years now, dynamic range far behind Nikon. And the mirrorless camera EOS M is a joke compared to the competion.

I sold my Canon gear recently and switched to SONY NEX. Beautiful little cams with APS-C sized sensors.

Wake up, Canon!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 25, 2013 at 10:31 UTC as 17th comment | 2 replies
On Sigma USB Dock quick review article (139 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mikhail Tal: Why is Andy Westlake reviewing some obscure gadget that is going to interest a tiny group of people, instead of one of the overdue mirrorless camera reviews like GF6, G6, NEX-5R, NEX-3N, E-PL5, etc? Obviously this is somewhat shorter than a camera review but it seems very strange to prioritize a niche product over a camera with much broader appeal, especially on DPR.

Mikhail is right!

Especially the new NEX-3N is so extremely good given the street price (€ 299,- with 16-50 zoom here in Germany), so it's very strange that one cannot find anything about it on this #1 photography website. The qualitiy of the images is even slightly better than those from an EOS 7D - just look at the High ISO Comparison section on imaging resource comparometer!

But on the other hand, this SIGMA USB dock is a very interesting gadget, too! Because now you can adjust front- or backfocus on SIGMA lenses, which seems to be a problem with these otherwise good and relatively cheap lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 13, 2013 at 04:50 UTC

I had two Nikon 1's: 1 J1 and 1 J2. I bought them when price was acceptable (€ 199 witj kit zoom). BUT:

I sold them recently, because they're simply not good enough! Low resolution, high noise!

Now I own a new SONY NEX-3NLB wjich really (!) gives me DSLR-quality in a similar small package! Fantastic camera.

Nikon, dump the 1 series and come back with an APS-C mirrorless. You can!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 05:23 UTC as 147th comment | 3 replies

"Video killed the radio star"

Smartphones killed the digital camera...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 05:17 UTC as 149th comment | 4 replies
On Preview:canon-eos-70d (1311 comments in total)

The 70D is - until now - a very normal DSLR, when talking about image qualitiy. It would be very interesting, whether the 70D has a better dynamic range than all the other Canons. In terms of dynamic range NIKON is FAR superior today.

Posted on Aug 7, 2013 at 14:27 UTC as 319th comment | 7 replies
On Preview:canon-eos-70d (1311 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peter62: Unimpressive!

High-ISO is slightly worse, e.g. compared to Pentax K5-II. Seems that all the engineering went into the LiveView-AF. Fuji's X100s and X-Pro 1 are better, too.

So for me, that's not enough.

Well, using the High-Iso-comparison feature on this website, I can clearly see the superior Hi-ISO images from the X100S or the Pentax K-5 II. But, if the dynamic range capabilities of the 70D turn out to be better than in other Canon APS-C cameras, this would really be good news!

Posted on Aug 7, 2013 at 14:23 UTC
On Preview:canon-eos-70d (1311 comments in total)

Unimpressive!

High-ISO is slightly worse, e.g. compared to Pentax K5-II. Seems that all the engineering went into the LiveView-AF. Fuji's X100s and X-Pro 1 are better, too.

So for me, that's not enough.

Posted on Aug 7, 2013 at 05:20 UTC as 339th comment | 4 replies
On Nikon D7100 Hands-on Preview preview (493 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peter62: Go to Hi-ISO comparison.
Choose ISO 12800.
Compare to FUJIFILM X-E1.
Move cursor to KODAK badge on the right.

Forget Nikon D7100...

Nikon-Fanboy?

What I see is a detailed AND noise-free image from the X-E1. The D7100 is clearly worth.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2013 at 21:11 UTC
On Nikon D7100 Hands-on Preview preview (493 comments in total)

Go to Hi-ISO comparison.
Choose ISO 12800.
Compare to FUJIFILM X-E1.
Move cursor to KODAK badge on the right.

Forget Nikon D7100...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2013 at 20:54 UTC as 74th comment | 4 replies
Total: 30, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »