Peter62: Sorry, but the Galaxy S4 is BETTER!
Look for yourself at the studio scene image comparison, low light, then look at the coloured, concentric cirlcles !
Another reason not to buy the S5!
I watched almost every detail, to me it seems that the S5 is not better than the S4.
In the lower right corner the S4 is clearly sharper. All in all, it could be a tie.
And the iPhone 5s is better than both Samsungs.
Sorry, but the Galaxy S4 is BETTER!
What a major step BACKWARDS for Nikon!
This camera is made for beginners, but costs more than most semi-pro DSLRs!
Nikon, where are you going? Believe me: next year this 1V3 will be sold for € 299 - including the lens!
It's a fantastic piece of art! And you can work with it - now! And you can make real money with it - even many years from now in the future!
Buy the X-A1, get the same image quality.
Quote: " The camera's DR modes also help you make the most of the sensor's impressive dynamic range."
The X-T1's dynamic range is FAR from being impressive! In fact, DR is VERY poor, compared to Nikon D7100 or almost any other comparable camera!
rwbaron: It appears Nikon has cleaned up the RAW performance by a good half stop compared the D4 which is admirable. I would say 409,600 D4S is not quite as good as 204,800 on D4 but close. I also looked for the 1DX to compare but alas not on the list so I took the 6D and wow, I had no idea the 6D was that good at low light high ISO shooting. Very close to the D4S at 102,400. This is good news for all of us regardless of brand.
There is absolutely NO difference to the D4. That's a fact.
Actually, every cheap Fuji comes extremely close. Go to Low Light, ISO 25600, point to the colored 6 circles and compare with the cheap X-M1 or the even cheaper X-A1.
There is a very, very small difference. But at what price?
Absolutely no visible difference to D4. In fact, the Fuji X-A1 is only very slightly worse than the D4s.
Go to "Studio Comparison (low light)" and select the SONY NEX-3N to compare with the Df, D610 and Alpha 7.
Select ISO 12800.
So, why buy a camera for 3000 bucks, when a € 300 camera comes THIS close!??
Zigmont: I guess I'm the only one who thinks this obsession with the past, i.e. "retro" is absurd. I'm old enough to remember the Nikon F's in the '60's, I don't want a camera that looks like that, I want something new and modern that breaks the old barriers.
Retro design is an excuse for companies who have no new ideas and can't come up with a new and ground-breaking design, so they go back to the past.
Quite frankly, I'm sick of all the new "retro" look cameras. I want the camera of 2020, not 1950.
@Zigmont: Good point!
photogeek: What Nikon needs right now is both APS-C and full-frame mirrorless cameras, with much smaller and lighter bodies and lenses. Not this retro BS that weighs 10 pounds with a decent lens on it.
Mirrorless or not - that has nothing to do with low light performance!
It's a fact: DSLRs with mirror are a thing of the past. Actually they are dead.
Someone should tell Nikon and Canon, before they are gone...
So boring...just another cash cow for Canon?
Nothing new since years now, dynamic range far behind Nikon. And the mirrorless camera EOS M is a joke compared to the competion.
I sold my Canon gear recently and switched to SONY NEX. Beautiful little cams with APS-C sized sensors.
Wake up, Canon!
Mikhail Tal: Why is Andy Westlake reviewing some obscure gadget that is going to interest a tiny group of people, instead of one of the overdue mirrorless camera reviews like GF6, G6, NEX-5R, NEX-3N, E-PL5, etc? Obviously this is somewhat shorter than a camera review but it seems very strange to prioritize a niche product over a camera with much broader appeal, especially on DPR.
Mikhail is right!
Especially the new NEX-3N is so extremely good given the street price (€ 299,- with 16-50 zoom here in Germany), so it's very strange that one cannot find anything about it on this #1 photography website. The qualitiy of the images is even slightly better than those from an EOS 7D - just look at the High ISO Comparison section on imaging resource comparometer!
But on the other hand, this SIGMA USB dock is a very interesting gadget, too! Because now you can adjust front- or backfocus on SIGMA lenses, which seems to be a problem with these otherwise good and relatively cheap lenses.
I had two Nikon 1's: 1 J1 and 1 J2. I bought them when price was acceptable (€ 199 witj kit zoom). BUT:
I sold them recently, because they're simply not good enough! Low resolution, high noise!
Now I own a new SONY NEX-3NLB wjich really (!) gives me DSLR-quality in a similar small package! Fantastic camera.
Nikon, dump the 1 series and come back with an APS-C mirrorless. You can!
"Video killed the radio star"
Smartphones killed the digital camera...
The 70D is - until now - a very normal DSLR, when talking about image qualitiy. It would be very interesting, whether the 70D has a better dynamic range than all the other Canons. In terms of dynamic range NIKON is FAR superior today.
High-ISO is slightly worse, e.g. compared to Pentax K5-II. Seems that all the engineering went into the LiveView-AF. Fuji's X100s and X-Pro 1 are better, too.
So for me, that's not enough.
Well, using the High-Iso-comparison feature on this website, I can clearly see the superior Hi-ISO images from the X100S or the Pentax K-5 II. But, if the dynamic range capabilities of the 70D turn out to be better than in other Canon APS-C cameras, this would really be good news!
Peter62: Go to Hi-ISO comparison. Choose ISO 12800. Compare to FUJIFILM X-E1.Move cursor to KODAK badge on the right.
Forget Nikon D7100...
What I see is a detailed AND noise-free image from the X-E1. The D7100 is clearly worth.
Go to Hi-ISO comparison. Choose ISO 12800. Compare to FUJIFILM X-E1.Move cursor to KODAK badge on the right.