I think another question to consider is that will people who buy the 760D be reluctant to upgrade to the 70D because the cheaper camera looks similar and has similar ergonomics.
I'm sure it's a great camera, but is the price premium over the Fuji XE2 or Olympus E-M1 worth it? I'd say no, but I'm sure Leica will still have plenty of orders for this camera.
A simple way to designate sensor size would be in percentage terms with 100% being a "full frame" sensor. A diagram with comparison to a full frame sensor would be another way of achieving a similar result.
I bought and I'm very happy with it. I'd still love to see more pancake lenses from Canon though. An EF-S 22mm f/2 pancake would be very desirable.
I'm currently using Lightroom 3.6. Is it possible to upgrade directly to Lightroom 5? Do I get to upgrade for the reduced price?
I'd love to see a similar list of video editing software.
Interesting concept, but I would prefer an 18mm f/2 prime to combine with the exisiting 30mm f/1.4. It would probably end up around a similar price and would have better image quality.
Canon needs a few more pancake lenses to go with this body. Surely it wouldn't be too hard to modify the EOS-M 22mm f/2 to fit the EF-S mount. Also if they want to really take the business away from the MILC sector they need to re-engineer the zoom to make it more compact.
I don't like the choice of focal length. Something in the range of 35-50mm equivalent would be better.
The combination of lens, sensor size, optical viewfinder and retro styling make it look like a great product. I look forward to reading a full review.
The absence of a Canon camera in the test group means that Canon really needs to update its waterproof camera models.