-
Posts to forums tend to magnify tone of language, and while your points were well taken, they came across as unnecessarily rude to this reader. The "Spammer" comment at the end was particularly...
-
Excellent idea, maybe you could start one up now that people are receiving their E-M1's and see that it's kept going for a bit. As I recall, some of these for the E-M5 stayed on the "top threads"...
-
Interesting theory. It does seem we're at a transitional phase in development of mirrorless cameras, with Panasonic introducing electronic shutters which don't experience shutter shock but...
-
Thanks for also noticing this uninvited shift in address, Colin.
As the OP, it was my intention to have 4/3's users respond to a question directed specifically at them. Someone made a one line...
-
Fun post, thanks for sharing your experience. Oh, and did you say you liked the 75 ;-) ?
Have you tried the PanLeica 25mm f1.4? A bargain at around $500 and it might make the perfect addition...
-
Helpful article, thank you. The image shown of shutter shock from a G6 is similar to some I've seen from my E-M5.
My most glaring case was a series of shots I took of wood ducks fully zoomed out in...
-
Based on reviewing the downloaded JPEG results closely, the S4 looks to these eyes as superior to the 5S by a small margin, and to the 5 by a wide margin, to the One by a wider margin still. I'm...
-
Yes, but now I'm curious to have other cameras checked for it and have it noted how often it crops up. I'm now curious how endemic it is in 1) mFT's with 5-axis (or other magnetic field) IBIS...
-
Yes, but now I'm curious to have other cameras checked for it and have it noted how often it crops up. I'm left wondering how endemic it is in 1) mFT's with 5-axis (or other magnetic field)...
-
I'm sure they were pretty careful before making their statement, but it is odd that other reviewers didn't turn this issue up and that posts on it haven't been rampant on the mFT forum, especially...
-
Thanks, I'll remember that. Didn't see any signs of shutter shock, but then I rarely see it in my E-M5 photos. My guess is it's not as common as DPR's statement on it in the E-P5 review makes it...
-
I've had the same thought. Never seemed to encounter it in my E-510, E-620 or E-PM1, only in my E-M5, mostly with the 75-300mm zoom (slow lens, so slower shutter speeds). And while I was never...
-
I've had the same thought. Never seemed to encounter it in my E-510, E-620 or E-PM1, only in my E-M5, mostly with the 75-300mm zoom (slow lens, so slower shutter speeds). And while I was never...
-
Can you repost this as a link?
-
Andy, there was no mention of camera shake effecting image quality in DPR's reviews of the E-M5 and E-PM2 (in fact no discussion of the performance of IBIS at all in the latter). Can you comment...
-
Andy, there was no mention of shutter shock effecting image quality in DPR's reviews of the E-M5 and E-PM2 (in fact no discussion of the performance of IBIS at all in the latter). Can you comment...
-
And this review will likely be its death knell.
-
I finally had a chance to read the article and very much enjoyed it.
It really puts the picture together on why Olympus took the route they have. They kept the E-7's development ongoing until they...
-
That's where I've been following it. A few threads have gone into it, mostly on the issue rearing its head in the E-M5, but now DPR's observation that shutter shock seemed to them noticeably worse...
-
From DPR's just released review:
Sadly, the biggest problem we've had with the E-P5 is something that's supposed to be counteracted by one of its biggest strengths - its five-axis image...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
| Total messages |
2746 |
| Threads started |
399 |
| Last post |
17 hours ago |
| Photos uploaded |
336 |
| Last upload |
Apr 10, 2010 |
|