davidkachel

davidkachel

Lives in United States TX, United States
Joined on Nov 3, 2008

Comments

Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11
In reply to:

princewolf: I can't buy one, so doesn't interest me. Waiting for Sony or Fuji to come up with that fixed-lens medium-format mirror-less for under 5000 bucks. Might be a long wait :)

Why Nikon over Sony? Never again. My next camera and all subsequent cameras with be Nikon. Sony will never again get another chance to pull the rug out from under me and stick me with lenses I can't put on an upgraded camera. I don't care if they bring out a 100 megapixel camera tomorrow, priced at two for $5.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 03:50 UTC
In reply to:

Lilien: This is a real bargain.
The camera is only $55.000 (A280 with 80 MP) and a 16(!) GB CF-Card is included and don't forget the the Microfiber Cloth!

And lens cleaning tissue and fluid! What a bargain!!!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 03:43 UTC
In reply to:

marc petzold: Where is the 6x9 Medium Format Sony Sensor`? ;)

It doesn't matter. Sony will put it into a mirrorless pocket camera, or sell it to Nikon.
Sony has guaranteed they will never get another dime from me. Anyone want to buy an a900 and lenses?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 03:39 UTC

Forty grand for something obsolete in a few years?
Gee! I'll take two!!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 03:37 UTC as 2nd comment

"products for the world’s most demanding fine art photographers"
REALLY?!!!
Anyone know any fine art photographers who can afford forty grand for a one-lens entry level model? I mean, real fine art photographers, not the ones playing "The Emperor's New Clothes" with the rich and gullible.
Commercial photographers, some of them, might be able to afford this, not fine art photographers.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 15, 2014 at 00:56 UTC as 23rd comment | 4 replies

Nice lens. What are we supposed to put it on?
Real photographers need REAL VIEWFINDERS.
Selling off my a900 and Zeiss lenses. Sony and Zeiss told me they don't want my money and that, like it or not, I would have to go buy Nikon.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 18, 2013 at 00:55 UTC as 11th comment | 3 replies

No doubt he will be the first wedding photographer in history to get sued by 50 newlywed couples at once!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 18, 2013 at 00:26 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies
On Interview - Phil Molyneux, President Sony Electronics article (133 comments in total)

What I want/need is very, very simple.
I need a box that stores a bunch of megapixels, 36 minimum, 50-60 would be better.
Three or four high quality lenses, nothing exotic.
A good, 100% optical viewfinder.
Apertures and shutter speeds, along with built-in metering.
An upgrade path for the future so that I can have exactly the same camera (more or less), with ever-increasing image quality.

Isn't it amazing that Sony built a new camera (a99) with lots of bells and whistles but STILL managed to fail me even on this very simple list?

Anybody want to buy an alpha 900 with some really nice lenses?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2012 at 15:45 UTC as 17th comment | 2 replies

WOW!
T-Rex is dead!
Does this mean all Kodak camera films are done? I guess so.
This may go down in history as the biggest mismanagement case ever.
After all, photography is not dead, just Kodak.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 24, 2012 at 19:15 UTC as 76th comment | 3 replies

If this is a copyright violation then every wedding and yearbook photograph is also. So is every painter of the same school who followed the first painter in that school.
Obviously, photographer #2 stole the style of photographer #1. Stealing style is not a copyright violation. It is simply a violation of taste and the wannabe rule.

The judge is out of his mind; but then, we kind of expect that from the whole upside down leftist British system.

The judge should instead have fined BOTH photographers for poor taste and boring us with their photographs.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 25, 2012 at 15:20 UTC as 192nd comment | 1 reply
On Adobe faces criticism for change of upgrade policy article (398 comments in total)

C'mon guys. Don't be so hard on Adobe. What else could they do? They don't have a Steve Jobs they can fire or a New Coke they can try to peddle. They have to do something monumentally stupid!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 29, 2011 at 01:15 UTC as 29th comment
Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11