miniTO

That is only good for framing... not focus point selection, etc... etc...

An optical snap on VF is only good for framing... not focus point selection, etc... etc...

Basically you get no feedback on anything. Great for setting everything and just shooting but its not...

okay... other than the fact that the X-Pro and XE-1 already have accurate autofocus??? speed is the only concern the masses seem to have and the rest just figure out how to use the camera.

Yes and No... in terms of light performance an F2 is an F2 your referring to depth of field only.  In a lot of cases I value a F2 for light performance over DOF.

Usually I would say you are correct about the release cycle.  However, I would really be surprised if the X-Pro's cycle isn't compressed due to the X100S addressing speed concerns with the...

Interesting... However the x100s seems to be a far more attractive camera.

Especially when you consider this thing with a OVF is 1500+. Then add in the slower (f2.8 vs f2) lens the only reason...

They do its called Silkypix and its bundled with the camera...

The professional version DP5 has IMO the best X-Trans conversions and is FAR more usable... though it should be the camera is...

lol, this is dpreview its just a gear forum... so of course its going to be covered 100 times

This isn't anything new Adobe Camera Raw cannot properly process Fuji Raw files simple and that...done and done...If you want proper RAW processing and are willing to spend some time learning new...

@isastickup... lol, wow... a post worthy of tin foil hat wearers everywhere...

Fuji actually has a very good track record of listening to customers

@isastickup... lol, wow... seems like you have a bit of a grudge...

In any case Fuji actually has a very good track record of listening to customers and from my experience very good customer...

you do realize the JPEGs don't exhibit the problems outlined? The problem is matching or improving on the internal engine for most programs...

you do realize the JPEGs don't exhibit the problems outlined? The problem is matching or improving on the internal Fuji RAW Converter...

Silkypix DP5 is a lot nicer to use IMO then the bundled version with great results! IMO

@R Butler

You should really try Silkypix DP5 with the RAF files... I would agree with marike6 it has very good results...

Well it is dpreview so this kind of over the top post is the norm...

Its really not bad... think what you will though... Silkypix DP5 does a very good job with fuji Raws...

it just takes some time to get used to over ACR

Its probably important to keep in mind the release notes:

"Preliminary Support"

Given that I have to say that I am very happy with the results of Capture One...

wow a sensable post ;-) that is exactly the way that I feel about the X-Pro 1...

Why would they do this in body now that they seem to be putting IS in the lenses?