Promit

And the answer is basically as simple as you could hope for: there's a video feed with a known electronic shutter time and known ISO. Measure the actual video frames periodically against a desired...

They're such dramatically different cameras in literally every way that I'm not sure how you could even begin to rank them on any technical basis. If you're lost between the two, you need to step...

In case you, like I, find this particular color scheme to be rather uncomfortable:http://connect.dpreview.com/forums/1041

Reasons I'm not giving up my EM5 for a GH3, in priority order:Oly IBISNo seriously, Oly IBISOly JPEGs are so much nicer than PanaBody sizeCash loss to sell EM5 and get GH3GH3 viewfinder may...

Ask Olympus...or try that on the 7-14 or the 7.5, let me know how that works out. At least none of the lenses seem to have internal/rear hoods.

http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/22/sony-20mm-18-200mm-e-mount-lenses/Okay, the 18-200 doesn't count. The 20mm is kinda interesting, although f/2.8 is disappointing. Leaves it head to head with the...

Oly OMD, P20, O45, P45-175, O12-50, O14-54IISony A65, 16-50/2.8, 35/1.8, 50/1.8 on order, 70-210/4.0

You weren't kidding about erotic. Whatever works for you, I guess. At a technical level, I personally think a less stark lighting style would be good. Are you using on-cam flash? Off-camera and...

No no no. Alpa and alpha are completely different lens mounts. We are not talking about Sony/Minolta Alpha lenses but ultra high end Alpa lenses that you have probably never even seen. Metabones'...

Eh? My OMD does continuous AF just fine with supported lenses. I mean it does a terrible job, but it's there in a pinch.I'm a very happy OMD (and reasonably long time m4/3) owner who tried the...

I am selling a 7-14mm f/4.0 lens for m4/3. The lens has some scuffing and scratches on the barrel but is optically perfect. However, I absolutely do not understand how to integrate UWA into my...

Yes; the 16-50 is a $700 lens of much higher quality. Better optics, better focusing, better build quality, better aperture.

The Sony stabilization is pretty good, but it isn't competition for the OMD. (It's probably comparable to the older 2-axis IBIS seen in the PENs). With the OMD I can hand-hold 25mm shots at 1/8s....

This is how my m4/3 cams have always been set up. I've been meaning to find out if the SLT can do it or not, but it was a trivial change to make on my EM5.

One way of looking at it is that f/6.3 sounds worse than it is; only a third of a stop worse than the long end of the 14-42. The Oly 14-42 II basically has a 1/3 sop advantage through the entire...

Yeah, it's just a surface crack from overtightening at the factory. Strictly cosmetic, they'll fix it if you want.

I have not yet seen an OMD in the wild in a number of places. I have seen a few of the Panasonics (G1, GF2, etc), a number of NEX bodies (including a VG20), and even a smattering of Nikon J1s. One...

I find it difficult to maneuver my shots the way I like when using a viewfinder, and I strongly dislike being stuck at eye level. So it's practically all LCD for me.

If we take the DXO charts as gospel, I can actually use a slightly higher shutter speed on my OMD than my A65, once we move past ISO 100. Seriously, whatever magic Sony put into that iteration of...

There are essentially three things to look at when evaluating the video functionality of a camera:The technical quality of the downsample and codec. There's a lot behind this, but the short of it...