klavrack

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Apr 12, 2007

Comments

Total: 31, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1051 comments in total)
In reply to:

jmfoots: Focus peaking, yo.

Indik--You're presuming that a birder has no interest in using this camera for anything else that might benefit from FP, like macro shots.

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 16:35 UTC
In reply to:

gravelhopper: I am a Pentax user myself. I understand users here expressing their high spirits about the K1 and Pentax / Ricoh overall development. But why pitting Pentax against other brands and provocing their followers? We should be better than that. Especially since we see many users of other brands expressing good wishes towards us Pentaxians.

Cheers

Agreed, but after having been viewed as 2nd-tier for quite awhile (not without basis), it's hard not to crow at least a little. And yes, we Pentaxians know that other brands still have their advantages.

Link | Posted on May 10, 2016 at 15:19 UTC
On article Worth the wait? A look inside the Pentax K-1 (649 comments in total)
In reply to:

KameraFever: Though it doesn't have quite the AF as Nikon and Canon, this seems to be a landscape photographers dream. Tiltable LCD for difficult angles, IBIS, pixel shift capture for static subjects, and weather sealing at this price point are insane.

Jimmy--Since you're able to judge the AF sub-par, I'm assuming you have a K-1 in hand for thorough testing. Can you educate us about its other aspects?

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 17:31 UTC
On article Worth the wait? A look inside the Pentax K-1 (649 comments in total)
In reply to:

NAwlins Contrarian: The autofocus points only cover a small fraction of the frame. That plus Pentax's historically class-trailing autofocus performance appear to significant downsides to what is otherwise a good value for the money with some interesting features.

Maybe, maybe not. I'll want to see how it fares in testing.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 17:20 UTC
On article Worth the wait? A look inside the Pentax K-1 (649 comments in total)
In reply to:

RedFox88: $1800 and no 4k? SMH lol!

In my experience, any post that requires the poster to LOL himself probably wasn't very humorous.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 16:57 UTC
On article Worth the wait? A look inside the Pentax K-1 (649 comments in total)
In reply to:

TN Args: I like the value proposition -- although Pentax lenses have always been overpriced IMHO.

I wonder why they didn't offer a pixel shift high res mode? Could have delivered 100 MP on tripod.

John's impression may be accurate but out-of-date. Retail prices of Pentax lenses are currently way down, at least in the U.S.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 16:55 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 First Impressions Review (981 comments in total)
In reply to:

Malcolm Kantzler: Does anyone know if the Pentax 645 SMC lenses (manual, AF, and Leaf Shutter) will work with this camera with at least Aperture-Priority metering, and if so with adapter, what the adapter is? Those 645 system lenses are beautiful performers and I'd love to be able to use them on a full-frame digital body w/o the expense of a medium-format digital body. Thanks.

Yes. There are a number of adapters available online.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 14:01 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 First Impressions Review (981 comments in total)
In reply to:

Terry Breedlove: I would buy in a heart beat. My only problem is I have several old Pentax manual focus lenses I would love to shoot with but I can not Manual focus the modern DSLR cameras if my life depended on it. I hate to say it but I am thinking about a Sony A7II just for that reason. I don't want to spend money on a bunch of new lenses but this Pentax really temps me.

Focus peaking really helps with this.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2016 at 23:58 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 First Impressions Review (981 comments in total)

The focus peaking is one of our favorite features on our Pentax--very useful for MF lenses, indispensable for macro shots, nice for fine-tuning other shots as well. Not sure I need FF for my shooting, but glad to see this feature included.

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2016 at 23:36 UTC as 226th comment | 1 reply
On photo IMGP8409-2 sm in klavrack's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Autumn colors along U.S. 41, Baraga, Michigan

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2014 at 14:25 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

jl_smith: Looks like a nice camera but 10 bucks says it still has sub-par AF. Those thinking this would replace a D300 or 7D for AF -intensive shooting might want to reconsider.

I just have to wonder about folks who judge the K-3 wonderful or terrible, based on no info whatsoever. I'm sure tests of this feature will occur soon. Word is that the DPR preview was of a pre-production model w/o final firmware. They claim great AF, and we will know for certain soon enough. Hopefully it will be, for the sake of Pentaxians and for the competitive pressure it'll put on the big boys.

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 15:00 UTC
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: Does this camera do AFC during video? Is the 4K video mode what everyone was calling the RAW mode?

AF yes, haven't heard yet about the other.

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 14:55 UTC
In reply to:

mosc: There are definitely some guys at Canon and Nikon that just pulled out some hair reading this pricing announcement! Not only does it hit their lens business but it puts the entire FF sensor format on notice.

Harold--agreed that there are other FF advantages. However, having something equivalent to a FF 2.8 zoom helps to equalize one big APS-C disadvantage. The newer APS-C sensors are also pretty good with high ISO and improved DR, as well. I'm personally picturing one of these on a $499 Pentax K30 IBIS body for a really capable non-pro kit.

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2013 at 15:46 UTC

Well it's understandably heavy, but I can slap it on my Pentax, get IS and focus peaking and go a long way towards eliminating my FF envy. Thanks, Sigma!

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2013 at 15:40 UTC as 60th comment
In reply to:

rgarijo: Sigma has just revived APS-C market. I am sure there is a grat party going on right now in Pentax headquarters.

Yep. I'm already thinking of getting one to replace my 17-50/2.8 for my K-5.

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2013 at 15:21 UTC
In reply to:

arpikusz: Is it just me, or are the K-30 the K-50 and the K-500 essentially the same camera? :-/

Pentax says as much--if you don't need WR, the K-500 lets you get the package w/o paying for what you don't want.

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2013 at 13:05 UTC
In reply to:

role_of_72: Apart from the AA battery thing this is what I call value for money!
Now let's see some good lens to come, Pentax ;)

Using AA's is an option. It comes standard with the LI109.

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2013 at 13:03 UTC

Given the need for Pentax to build brand awareness, the optional colors seem smart...they would distinguish the P's from the C's and N's.

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2013 at 13:01 UTC as 23rd comment
In reply to:

thomas2279f: Looks like good cameras; dig the colors, good resolution at 16mp, competitively price and some good lenses.

Only wish was that they included 1 D-LI109 battery with the camera and you may need quite few sets of 4xAA batteries and higher capacity ones to have decent battery life and the battery compartment could get a tad warm as well.

It does. The AA configuration is what's optional.

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2013 at 13:00 UTC

Seems like a good move. However, if I wanted one and already had lenses, I'd pick up a K-30 at B&H for $499 while they last.

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2013 at 00:30 UTC as 43rd comment | 1 reply
Total: 31, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »