I have been using viewpoint 2 for quite some time now for my Real Estate work but as with DXO Optics Pro it is far too slow. If I want to use Viewpoint to open files from a folder it will often refuse to save the file and I can't close the file. Also the way the keystone lines are implemented is much slower than the way it is done in Optics pro - but that is also flawed by insisting on a side by side before and after window making it awkward and forcing you to zoom and pan all the time. And we trust (?) these guys with sensor ratings. Hmmm… I am giving up on Viewpoint 2 and just using Edit/Transform/skew for all but the most awkward fixes..I don't have the time to wait for the plug-in app to open EVERY TIME or for the Desktop app to never save.
Weissbier: One would think that it wouldn't be too difficult for Tamron to make versions of this lens for E-mount, X-mount and NX-mount. Not that I'm interested in a super zoom particularly, I'm just happy too see more third-party support for mirrorless.
Ed Chen: But not as good as a Fuji X100 overall.
crashpc: M mount still dead?No way, M3 is coming!
StevenE: If you put it in your pocket with this lens on it someone will think you are very pleased to see them indeed. Seriously I don't get the point of a large lens on the M.
arcane93: I bought the RX100 II when it came out last year, and I've loved it enough that I would have actually considered upgrading to the new model this year with the right set of new features. The improvements in aperture by themselves would have been enough to sell me, but a loss of 30mm at the long end? That's a deal breaker as far as I'm concerned. I use my RX100 II a lot for concert shooting (one of my main reasons for buying it, actually), and I need all of the telephoto range that I can get. If anything, I wanted more, not less. Maybe next time, Sony!
arcane93: You make a good point BUT the shorter the zoom range the better the lens quality. Case in point Canon 70-200 range - Excellent IQ. Canon 24-105 very good. Canon 18-200 Pretty good. There is always a compromise and Sony seems to have chosen the best quality route and good for them too. With 20Mp to play with you can consider this a good 24-120mm camera.
avicenanw. Thanks for speaking for everyone - NOT!
JJLMD: When I had the RX100, I bought the NEX-6 thinking I was adding a bigger and better camera. Bigger, yes, but with the 16-50 kit, I was shocked at how much sharper the RX100 was in comparison to this combo! I haven't tried the A6000, which I'm guessing is better than the NEX-6, but it would need to be profoundly better, especially with the 16-50 kit, because the IQ of the RX100m3 is several notches better than the RX100. With the RX100, I always felt the IQ was excellent for a pocketable compact but with the RX100m3, I find the IQ excellent, period. I use the RX1R and A7 when I'm not using the RX100m3.
Haven't heard good things about the 16-50. The lens quality is SO important!
Yes they should now bring out a MkIII T (Telephoto) with a longer zoom (28-200).
Fuji are on to it. Quality lens for a quality system.
This is the highest score I remember seeing on this site. Well done Sigma.
Scottelly: From viewing the studio comparison at various ISO settings, I'm very impressed with the performance at ISO 125 vs. the Canon 70 D and Nikon D3200 at 100 ISO. The others appear to be slightly better around ISO 800, but even by ISO 1600 they have do not blow away this little camera. That's REALLY surprising. Amazingly, even at ISO 6400 the differences between the bigger DSLR cameras and this little point-and-shoot are surprisingly little. Yes, the images from little Sony have slightly more obvious noise, and there is slightly less detail visible. But at ISO 6400 I would expect the photos from the 1" sensor in the Sony to just fall apart, and they don't. It's really pretty amazing, for such a pocketable camera!
What continues to amaze me is how well the OMD series perform at higher ISOs
ZWTang: It's a little bit better than RX100 II. This is how Sony squeezes your money. I'm tired of its game. Sony, why not try your best to surprise people and get the market? Do not fool customers. I'm waiting to see how Sony a77 II works as I plan to upgrade my a57. I was very optimistic but now... If it's the same way as RX100 III, I'll go for Olympus/Fuji/Panasonic. Sigh...
The trouble with Sony is that it is not been focused on cameras as it's core business but keeps changing from one good idea to the next. I think it is maturing though as evident with the A7 series and this 3rd gen Rx100 which I think will be very successful. I am interested in it for sure. Could this replace both my X100 and LF1?
It's called consumerism. If you don't like it stop buying. Simple fix! : )
Usernamefail: What I want in Photoshop (and Illustrator and Indesign) is a reverse lookup table that tells me what I just did when I accidentally get a shortcut wrong and weird stuff happens. :(
I have my shortcuts override a lot of the standard stuff but still this is good.Only thing I can't figure out is how I mage to accidentally switch the keystroke for opacity and flow in the stamp tool. I want it to be so that if I press a number eg 6 that changes opacity (to 60%) but I have somehow switched it to change flow. I now have to use Shift and the number to change opacity.
Jogger: Canon should just start using Sony sensors; they have fallen so far behind, its not even funny.
I thought the 70D was cleaner at hi ISOs as well as the af improvement. Maybe they will put the sensor in the 7D replacement.
Dougbm_2: Does this not have Custom mode eg C1, C2? That's a shame as I find that really useful on my LF1. I have standard setting assigned and can fiddle with that and then reset by just switching off or moving to one mode and back again. Really helpful if you set an unusual parameter but forgot you had done that eg 60fps.
Ah cheers for that
cheetah43: A fast 35mm-105mm equivalent lens would please quite a lot of people.
An alternative RX100 MIII T (for telephoto) model could please those who need more reach and don't mind sacrificing lens brightness. So then you could choose the RX100MKIII with the 24-70 f1.8-2.8 lens or an RX100MKII T with an 28-140 f2.8-5.9 lens. That lens may possibly be too large for the body though.
Geir Ove: Great camera, BUT No GPS, no interest!
Why do we have GPS info in programs like LightRoom if the cameras can't provide the GPS info?
Yeah, I know I can synch with a Phone with GPS, but IMO way to cumbersome...
DPReview: Why not start using lack of GPS as a Con in your reviews?
After all, we are spelling year 2014....
I want voice annotation. GPS is fine but it can't tell you the name of the place/building/person you are photographing. My Fuji S2 Pro had that. Very useful.
Does this not have Custom mode eg C1, C2? That's a shame as I find that really useful on my LF1. I have standard setting assigned and can fiddle with that and then reset by just switching off or moving to one mode and back again. Really helpful if you set an unusual parameter but forgot you had done that eg 60fps.
white shadow: Now, it may be a good time to get the Mk2 as price will drop to make way for the Mk3.
I think the pop-up EVF is a gimmick. The flash hot shoe is more useful.
Unfortunately, they didn't improve on the clickless front wheel and provide an external battery charger.
The faster lens is welcome but I think the old one is good enough for casual photography.
How is the EVF a gimmick? It s a really useful feature cleverly implemented. A hot show on a tiny camera such as this has much less usefulness then the evf