wildbild

wildbild

Joined on Sep 27, 2011

Comments

Total: 64, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (1872 comments in total)
In reply to:

wildbild: could have had a better viewfinder/prism with larger magnification.
otherwise a brick solid piece of enginiering from canon.
and to all the megapixel complainees: how often do you print your pictures 30x 40" on a daily basis? hahaha!!!

upsample your pictures in PS and delete all exif date from the files and no one will notice. this obsession with megapixels is laughable as long as most people use zoom-lenses

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 20:13 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (1872 comments in total)
In reply to:

MaxTheHorse: Genuine no-troll question. In the UK this camera is being sold for almost exactly 2x the price of the APS-C Nikon D7100. It's only £230 less than the new Full Frame D750. That seems somewhat over the top. What am I missing?
One other observation. Most people agree that both Nikon and Canon are feeling the heat from mirrorless. With the new (relatively) lightweight D750, Nikon at least seem to be going some way to trying to address one disadvantage of the DSLR relative to mirrorless, namely weight. So how come Canon have put out a new DSLR that is not only heavier than the Nikon APSC equivalent but also their new FF D750? As I say, not trolling, just genuinely curious.

it's the price of a mirror box that is flapping 10x per second...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 20:04 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1425 comments in total)

i am a bit worried with this huge erection of the lens out of that tiny body.
looks too arousing for me though...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 19:40 UTC as 247th comment
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (1872 comments in total)

could have had a better viewfinder/prism with larger magnification.
otherwise a brick solid piece of enginiering from canon.
and to all the megapixel complainees: how often do you print your pictures 30x 40" on a daily basis? hahaha!!!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 19:22 UTC as 257th comment | 5 replies
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Review preview (682 comments in total)

Thanks for posting this review so quickly after the camera's introduction.
The funny thing with this camera that I noticed is, that raw files from ISO400 onward look much sharper than those shot with lower ISOs … still rubbing my eyes.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 21, 2014 at 22:24 UTC as 188th comment
In reply to:

wildbild: I was really hoping for this next generation of sigma cameras to hit the shelf until I saw these first image samples today .. magenta and green blotchy crap. Oh boy did they blow this!
I better get myself 5dmkii i think …

just have a look at this:
http://www.sigma-global.com/en/cameras/dp-series/gallery/

Direct link | Posted on Jun 13, 2014 at 10:43 UTC

I was really hoping for this next generation of sigma cameras to hit the shelf until I saw these first image samples today .. magenta and green blotchy crap. Oh boy did they blow this!
I better get myself 5dmkii i think …

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2014 at 18:37 UTC as 17th comment | 5 replies

i don't get why sigma's engineers think theese cameras are operated hand held. the should have a second tripod mount where the sd-card door is..

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2014 at 11:31 UTC as 210th comment

Given the fact that they are no professional photo agency I think 70—90% would be an appropriate share »that brings dignity to the photographer«.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2014 at 01:07 UTC as 22nd comment

it's not a trick—it's a phony

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2014 at 16:42 UTC as 84th comment
On Pentax K-3 real-world samples gallery article (150 comments in total)

those snaps only prove you need really good glass for 24Mpix

Direct link | Posted on Nov 11, 2013 at 07:05 UTC as 61st comment | 1 reply

The Lytro is not a consumer product.
It is still this great technology that hasn't found it's purpose, yet.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 13, 2013 at 07:49 UTC as 23rd comment | 2 replies
On Just posted: Our Canon EOS 70D hands-on preview article (355 comments in total)
In reply to:

DenWil: I will be interested to see if a FF sensor with the same pixel density is forthcoming.

such a sensor would be really stupid.
imagine a 40+ MPixel sensor no landscape photographer could use because of defraction is starting at f6.3

Direct link | Posted on Jul 2, 2013 at 12:04 UTC

Thank god it's not 24 mpixel! Defraction would have been noticable from f8 on..

Direct link | Posted on Jul 2, 2013 at 09:34 UTC as 52nd comment | 5 replies
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R Preview preview (114 comments in total)

They shouldn't have done this. To my eyes the images do not look any sharper but certainly show a whole lot more moiré.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2013 at 08:14 UTC as 60th comment
On Fujifilm introduces XF 27mm F2.8 'pancake' lens article (88 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: It loses a stop to Pana 20/1.7 and Samsung 30/2.0, yet priced higher. Bad value.

the price is outrageous!
the canon 40mm 2.8 is 179 EUR! and that is FF

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2013 at 17:55 UTC
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 in-depth review article (397 comments in total)
In reply to:

dharma108: Hmmm...a gold award for a $1200 DLSR that shooters of sports/action and/or wild life--as in birds of flight, etc--can not realistically shoot in raw mode because of the buffer limitations?

Something does not compute for me here. The buffer limitations is a total deal breaker for me. Should it now be known that the 7100 is just for still photography?

I forgot to tell you: 6 frames only can be really annoying!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 26, 2013 at 17:31 UTC
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 in-depth review article (397 comments in total)
In reply to:

dharma108: Hmmm...a gold award for a $1200 DLSR that shooters of sports/action and/or wild life--as in birds of flight, etc--can not realistically shoot in raw mode because of the buffer limitations?

Something does not compute for me here. The buffer limitations is a total deal breaker for me. Should it now be known that the 7100 is just for still photography?

My Canon 10D from 2003 buffers 6 frames in RAW. But hey.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 26, 2013 at 17:25 UTC
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 in-depth review article (397 comments in total)
In reply to:

mike kobal: thanks to the dpreview team for another excellent review! Looks like a killer APSC shooter, too bad about the terrible raw buffer (:
I will patiently wait for the D900E with this sensor, ~54mp, rip medium format

Funny idea — a 54mp FFcamera would have defraction starting at f6.3. That would make all your f16 Landscapes look as soft as 70ies softp°rn. Even with the big proud capital E.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 26, 2013 at 16:03 UTC
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 in-depth review article (397 comments in total)

And don't forget to buy a new computer first capable of handling the huge files ; )

Direct link | Posted on Apr 26, 2013 at 15:52 UTC as 63rd comment
Total: 64, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »