PIX 2015
Thanatham Piriyakarnjanakul

Thanatham Piriyakarnjanakul

Lives in Thailand Bangkok, Thailand
Works as a Photographer
Joined on Mar 5, 2003
About me:

I AM NIKON~!!!

Comments

Total: 115, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

2.8 zoom?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 24, 2013 at 15:38 UTC as 15th comment

Ouch!! you choose the right photo.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 14:39 UTC as 97th comment
On Nikkor 18-140mm F3.5-5.6G ED VR hints at mid-range DSLR article (190 comments in total)

Ring-type motor, it's should be fast AF.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2013 at 05:15 UTC as 83rd comment
On Nikon adds Speedlight SB-300 flashgun to its arsenal article (46 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nismo350Z: I think I'll wait. Not long from now, Nikon will release a SB-310 due to the thermal cut-out protection being too aggressive ;)

Thermal cut-out can turn off any time (And it have thermal indicator while you turn Thermal cut-out off), I turn off it in 10 second after received my first SB-900. Why you don't know how to turn it off???

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2013 at 05:05 UTC
In reply to:

AbrasiveReducer: Wow. If this is true, the one area where Canon is significantly behind Nikon is fixable.

Do it at your own risk, only rich kid will do that.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 18, 2013 at 04:11 UTC
On Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Preview preview (347 comments in total)

Hope for 18-55 f/1.8 OS!! Sigma do it!!! Please!!! :)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2013 at 07:21 UTC as 14th comment | 4 replies

How about 'Ken Rockwell'?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2013 at 04:49 UTC as 90th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Preternatural Stuff: What is it with writers nowadays. Its not the shutter sound that needs muffling!

Its the mirror slap - a dinosaur legacy of hte film era!

Even during the film era, we used rangefinder cameras for theatre productions that demanded it.

Today, if you want silent, any of the gazillion mirrorless or Sony SLT cameras are already inherently so.

Duh...

Cost?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2013 at 05:12 UTC

I want wireless charger for AW120. ^^

Direct link | Posted on Jul 9, 2013 at 10:33 UTC as 25th comment

Nikon 200-400 not just a half price but all body that match a 200-400 have and built-in tele-converter that call 'high-speed crop'.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2013 at 10:10 UTC as 15th comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

chlamchowder: The Nikon AF-S 200-400/4 VR II is $6750, and the TC-14E is $500. Together, they would cost $7520.
So, the question is, is the convenience of having the teleconverter built in worth $4480?

With crop body Nikon do it better convenience.

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2013 at 08:04 UTC
In reply to:

NDaniel: a very good article love it :)

if you have time kindly drop by to:

my portfolio at www.facebook.com/nisdanielphotography

regards

Nis

a very good article love it :0

if you have time kindly drop by to:

my portfolio at https://www.facebook.com/9Peding

regards

TNT

Direct link | Posted on May 2, 2013 at 18:17 UTC

I hope for 4k on Nikon 1.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 18, 2013 at 03:22 UTC as 21st comment

Hope it's not ruins camera & lens. Amen...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 14, 2013 at 16:58 UTC as 98th comment

Great camera, fool comments. :)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2013 at 06:21 UTC as 23rd comment
On New image viewing options for forums article (162 comments in total)

Arrrghhh~!!! The Cyclop is very scary. :D

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2013 at 05:34 UTC as 66th comment
On bb_DSC_0131 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (8 comments in total)
In reply to:

jnk: coming from this sensor - this is not bad at all - it actually look decent and I'm surprised @ ISO 800 - the noise level is very acceptable.

Hi, photofan1986 can you show me a picture?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 3, 2013 at 09:28 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (8 comments in total)
In reply to:

jnk: coming from this sensor - this is not bad at all - it actually look decent and I'm surprised @ ISO 800 - the noise level is very acceptable.

Hi, photofan1986 can you show me a picture?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 3, 2013 at 09:28 UTC
In reply to:

worldcup1982: Here comes the V2...with minor improvements, too bad...im into photos, not video....nikon, you will stay behind competition....mirrorless all over the place, and nikon worried about not hurting their APS-C sales....

Behind? You are so funny. I'm using Nikon 1, the quality is ok for most people and it can do a professional work. The Nikon 1 lens are so small. (except the 10-100VR) And when you use 70-200 2.8 it's turn that lens to 189-540 2.8, no one like this.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2012 at 14:04 UTC
On DSC_3991 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ed Richer: I see a lot of vertical banding :-)

Your joke isn't funny!! :P

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2012 at 08:04 UTC
Total: 115, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »