HelgaS: Any info on whether the rx iv is compatible with the nauticam rx iii housing?
Richard - look forward to your review on the RX100 IV..any timeframe we can expect to see it?
Oops! Looks like Canon GOOFED AGAIN!
Only a Recommended rating instead of the expected Highly Recommended:
"The Canon PowerShot G3 X is almost the perfect super-zoom camera for more experienced photographers, but the decision not to include a built-in viewfinder turns the G3 X into a near-miss..."
Chris62: No reason to buy for reasonable customers.Expensive camera with fixed lens means in case any camera damage the expensive fixed lens aso goes to the trash.If price is higher the camera lens must be detachable.
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?????
Jennyhappy2: Looks to be a hit...selling at #1 on Amazon.com
Competition from Canon the Sony RX100 line??? LMAO!
Mike FL - Good point! So sad some individuals cannot stay on topic.
Too slow and too expensive. Canon makes you make an extra $249 for an external EVT... no thanks.
When does the G3X II come out?
Looks to be a hit...selling at #1 on Amazon.com
$1,000 camera that size with no built in EVF nor 4K and F5.6 Starting at only 164mm???? OMG!
JJ Rodin: Saw mention and pics of this several months ago, and finally we see it a bit better. Looks like a very good competitor for RX100III/IV maybe even RX10II.
Just sad it has a Sony sensor in a Canon cam :(
Not a RX100 III/IV competitor, but a $1,240 near competitor of the RX10 having to buy the EVF separately.
phazelag: That Continuous FPS rate in JPEG and RAW just turned me off from this camera.
The FZ1000 AF and FPS is JPEG and RAW is so far superior its not even worth comparing.
I like Canon colors and I like the compact nature of this camera, but I think Canon crippled this camera with such weak shot to shot performance.
Very true. Why does Canon keep doing this Canonitis behavior?
Hinder: Why does Canon keep making cameras that everyone ALMOST wants? This was soooo close to being good. Even a tunnel VF is better than nothing. Yes, I know about the add on but Canon says you'll get about 40 pictures less per battery when using it, I'm thinking they're stretching the truth a bit, it's might be double that.
Think most would agree a built in EVF is far more important than a touchscreen. What good is touch screen if you can't even see it on a bright sunny day. Welcome to usability Damian.
AF alone seems to have further advanced the RX100 series in the IV.
Kind of scary, but if you look above in the Gear In This Story section, 10 people indicate for the RX100 IV they have already owned it. Kind of scary or maybe their just confused?.
Jennyhappy2: The more negative comments on the RX100 IV, the popular it becomes. Everyone seems to be an expert Of which probably none of them don't even own a RX100 I, II, or II. Let alone a Sony camera.
If I recall, many felt the same thing when the original RX100 came out.
Own the RX100 III and previously the Canon G1X II. I see you own the G7X so welcome to the Sony forum. Guess you are looking to upgrade to either the RX100 III or IV. Given the issues with the G7X, good idea!
Who's quote is that statement or something you said previously?
Searching: Unremarkable is what I see.
All depends how you look at things and even more so since you don't own a RX100 I, II, or III and all your activity has been in the Canon DSLR and Micro Four Thirds forums so.....
The more negative comments on the RX100 IV, the popular it becomes. Everyone seems to be an expert Of which probably none of them don't even own a RX100 I, II, or II. Let alone a Sony camera.
OngNikon: Each time a new camera came out, there are always tons of experts who will run it down, saying that there is no improvement or worst than the last model.
I just wonder how did we get this current level of marvelous digital imaging technology?, since last year's one is as good, ir not, better than this year's!
Agree since everyone said the same thing when the II came out and then the III.
Ok now ready...open your eyes....and there you go.
Spongemac: i stand by my previous assessment with m4. Basically, its 1" sensor and Sony is asking 1k for it. i'm sure its worth it for some. Looks like i'll have to move into APSC sensor to get my low light shots. tysm for posting those pics, its very helpful.
Yeah....so what's the issue?