Jennyhappy2

Jennyhappy2

Joined on Aug 14, 2012

Comments

Total: 132, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV First Impressions Review preview (1267 comments in total)
In reply to:

HelgaS: Any info on whether the rx iv is compatible with the nauticam rx iii housing?

Richard - look forward to your review on the RX100 IV..any timeframe we can expect to see it?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2015 at 11:26 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G3 X: What you need to know article (596 comments in total)

Oops! Looks like Canon GOOFED AGAIN!

http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/canon_powershot_g3_x_review/conclusion/

Only a Recommended rating instead of the expected Highly Recommended:

"The Canon PowerShot G3 X is almost the perfect super-zoom camera for more experienced photographers, but the decision not to include a built-in viewfinder turns the G3 X into a near-miss..."

Direct link | Posted on Jul 15, 2015 at 22:39 UTC as 7th comment | 2 replies
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV First Impressions Review preview (1267 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chris62: No reason to buy for reasonable customers.
Expensive camera with fixed lens means in case any camera damage the expensive fixed lens aso goes to the trash.
If price is higher the camera lens must be detachable.

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?????

Direct link | Posted on Jul 15, 2015 at 11:35 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV First Impressions Review preview (1267 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jennyhappy2: Looks to be a hit...selling at #1 on Amazon.com

Competition from Canon the Sony RX100 line??? LMAO!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 15, 2015 at 11:34 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV First Impressions Review preview (1267 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jennyhappy2: Looks to be a hit...selling at #1 on Amazon.com

Mike FL - Good point! So sad some individuals cannot stay on topic.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 14, 2015 at 18:54 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G3 X: What you need to know article (596 comments in total)

Too slow and too expensive. Canon makes you make an extra $249 for an external EVT... no thanks.

When does the G3X II come out?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 14, 2015 at 18:19 UTC as 8th comment
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV First Impressions Review preview (1267 comments in total)

Looks to be a hit...selling at #1 on Amazon.com

Direct link | Posted on Jul 14, 2015 at 18:16 UTC as 206th comment | 11 replies
On Canon PowerShot G3 X: What you need to know article (596 comments in total)

$1,000 camera that size with no built in EVF nor 4K and F5.6 Starting at only 164mm???? OMG!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 12, 2015 at 18:35 UTC as 10th comment | 3 replies
On Canon PowerShot G3 X: What you need to know article (596 comments in total)
In reply to:

JJ Rodin: Saw mention and pics of this several months ago, and finally we see it a bit better. Looks like a very good competitor for RX100III/IV maybe even RX10II.

Just sad it has a Sony sensor in a Canon cam :(

Not a RX100 III/IV competitor, but a $1,240 near competitor of the RX10 having to buy the EVF separately.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 3, 2015 at 13:05 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G3 X: What you need to know article (596 comments in total)
In reply to:

phazelag: That Continuous FPS rate in JPEG and RAW just turned me off from this camera.

The FZ1000 AF and FPS is JPEG and RAW is so far superior its not even worth comparing.

I like Canon colors and I like the compact nature of this camera, but I think Canon crippled this camera with such weak shot to shot performance.

Very true. Why does Canon keep doing this Canonitis behavior?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 3, 2015 at 13:03 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G3 X: What you need to know article (596 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hinder: Why does Canon keep making cameras that everyone ALMOST wants? This was soooo close to being good. Even a tunnel VF is better than nothing. Yes, I know about the add on but Canon says you'll get about 40 pictures less per battery when using it, I'm thinking they're stretching the truth a bit, it's might be double that.

Think most would agree a built in EVF is far more important than a touchscreen. What good is touch screen if you can't even see it on a bright sunny day. Welcome to usability Damian.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 3, 2015 at 13:02 UTC
On Sony: An eye on focus article (758 comments in total)

AF alone seems to have further advanced the RX100 series in the IV.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 3, 2015 at 02:57 UTC as 67th comment

Kind of scary, but if you look above in the Gear In This Story section, 10 people indicate for the RX100 IV they have already owned it. Kind of scary or maybe their just confused?.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 1, 2015 at 11:07 UTC as 15th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Jennyhappy2: The more negative comments on the RX100 IV, the popular it becomes. Everyone seems to be an expert Of which probably none of them don't even own a RX100 I, II, or II. Let alone a Sony camera.

If I recall, many felt the same thing when the original RX100 came out.

Own the RX100 III and previously the Canon G1X II. I see you own the G7X so welcome to the Sony forum. Guess you are looking to upgrade to either the RX100 III or IV. Given the issues with the G7X, good idea!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 1, 2015 at 10:27 UTC
In reply to:

Jennyhappy2: The more negative comments on the RX100 IV, the popular it becomes. Everyone seems to be an expert Of which probably none of them don't even own a RX100 I, II, or II. Let alone a Sony camera.

If I recall, many felt the same thing when the original RX100 came out.

Who's quote is that statement or something you said previously?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 1, 2015 at 01:56 UTC
In reply to:

Searching: Unremarkable is what I see.

All depends how you look at things and even more so since you don't own a RX100 I, II, or III and all your activity has been in the Canon DSLR and Micro Four Thirds forums so.....

Direct link | Posted on Jun 30, 2015 at 23:41 UTC

The more negative comments on the RX100 IV, the popular it becomes. Everyone seems to be an expert Of which probably none of them don't even own a RX100 I, II, or II. Let alone a Sony camera.

If I recall, many felt the same thing when the original RX100 came out.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 30, 2015 at 23:21 UTC as 17th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

OngNikon: Each time a new camera came out, there are always tons of experts who will run it down, saying that there is no improvement or worst than the last model.

I just wonder how did we get this current level of marvelous digital imaging technology?, since last year's one is as good, ir not, better than this year's!

Agree since everyone said the same thing when the II came out and then the III.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 30, 2015 at 23:17 UTC
In reply to:

Searching: Unremarkable is what I see.

Ok now ready...open your eyes....and there you go.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 30, 2015 at 23:14 UTC
In reply to:

Spongemac: i stand by my previous assessment with m4. Basically, its 1" sensor and Sony is asking 1k for it. i'm sure its worth it for some. Looks like i'll have to move into APSC sensor to get my low light shots. tysm for posting those pics, its very helpful.

Yeah....so what's the issue?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 30, 2015 at 21:05 UTC
Total: 132, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »