lightandday

lightandday

Lives in Australia Australia
Joined on Feb 18, 2012

Comments

Total: 77, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On Olympus OM-D E-M10 and E-M1 get firmware updates article (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marc Rogoff: Wow! Fantastic update...I can now use all my old 4/3 glass again. Probably as fast as it ever was... Very happy indeed...

The value of the $500 50-200 SWD I bought has just gone UP !
THANK YOU OLYMPUS !

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2014 at 05:00 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M10 and E-M1 get firmware updates article (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

Digitall: Don't forget the new Update fix 1.5, to repair a problem found in 1.4.

NOT FOR EM-1 OR EM-10 !

N. B. Fix V1.5 is NOT for the above but the EP-5

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2014 at 04:55 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M10 and E-M1 get firmware updates article (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

schawo: Any tests of the new FW with legacy 4/3 lenses like the 50-200 SWD?

Just had a quick test with a 50- 200 SWD -- MUCH BETTER --FAST AND SEEMS TO LOCK ON TO DIFFICULT SUBJECTS EASIER !
VERY IMPRESSESD !

Direct link | Posted on May 23, 2014 at 08:32 UTC
On Nikon to offer D600 replacements if 'spots' continue article (174 comments in total)
In reply to:

lap777: Now every D600 has un unlimited time shutter warranty. Who's gonna cry now?

Hi AR,
I still wish I had never bought a FUJIFILM X10 Orb machine -- it took ages for the company to admit the fault and a lifetime for me to wait for the " FUN" to return to using the camera !

Direct link | Posted on Mar 28, 2014 at 23:44 UTC
On Leica invites entries for 2014 Oskar Barnack Award article (63 comments in total)
In reply to:

Julian: A shame its only open to "professional photographers".

It's a shame it only open to " the young "

Direct link | Posted on Nov 19, 2013 at 11:53 UTC

Thank you for the post !

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2013 at 03:48 UTC as 27th comment
On Olympus PEN E-P5 Preview preview (380 comments in total)

Thank you - I've just phoned all known PERTH -Australia OLYMPUS fans to let them know of this post !

Direct link | Posted on May 10, 2013 at 05:52 UTC as 106th comment | 1 reply
On 2013 Pulitzer Prize photography winners announced article (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

Airless: Bullet holes image is horribly underexposed. Has the guy never heard of photoshop or at least high ISO?

Like your humor ! - Looks like you have been taken seriously ?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 17, 2013 at 05:37 UTC

If Nikon has offened you - make a donation to Conservation Education and
" Don't shoot to kill leave your RIFLE at home and shoot with a CANON !! "

Direct link | Posted on Apr 5, 2013 at 01:52 UTC as 34th comment

Fantastic portrait !

Direct link | Posted on Apr 4, 2013 at 01:55 UTC as 3rd comment

NIKON YOU NEED TO OPEN A CONSERVATION FOUNDATION TO PUT LARGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY BACK INTO NATURE !!

SOONER RATHER THAN LATER--- LIKE NOW !!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 4, 2013 at 01:50 UTC as 93rd comment
In reply to:

Anfy: As an animal rights advocate and Nikon user I feel very bad for this news. I am seriously considering complete switch to another brand, mainly Olympus and Panasonic which, as to my knowledge, do not sell hunting devices. Or am I wrong?

PLEASE Don't change ask Nikon to consider a "LARGE " donation to Elephant, Gorilla, Tiger ,Rhino,Cheeta,Lateral thinkers -----etc. conservation !

Direct link | Posted on Apr 4, 2013 at 01:47 UTC
On Just posted: Hands-on preview of the Canon EOS 100D/SL1 article (379 comments in total)
In reply to:

rallyfan: This makes me much less interested in μ4/3 bodies. I'd like to see a comparison between this and the OMD, but for a change I'd like to see SPORTS SHOTS rather than a bridge in the samples.

If this is quicker to focus and keeps subjects tracked well, I want one. The lenses aren't an issue, I've got them. I want a small body that can track a moving object. I don't care about scenery shots and buildings etc. Moving objects, focus tracking -- that's it.

Will this beat the μ4/3 bodies at sports shots? If so, I'm in.

Small camera + Huge lens = !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 23, 2013 at 05:25 UTC
On Just posted: Hands-on preview of the Canon EOS 100D/SL1 article (379 comments in total)
In reply to:

xxbluejay21: What a horrible camera. Canon really are getting desperate.

Not only desperate ! but stupid marketing .

In another form it was sugested that it would make a good campanion to a 5D so that EF lenses could be shared - perhaps if they had a 35mm but as a 5D owner I wouldn't Buy !
This camera will only be bought as a "ONLY CAMERA "with a packaged zoom and I suspect that most Camera salespersons would offer a FUJI X /Sony NEX or a real camera like a D7100 as an alternative ( even a greater cost )!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 22, 2013 at 04:48 UTC
On Just posted: Hands-on preview of the Canon EOS 100D/SL1 article (379 comments in total)
In reply to:

Holger Drallmeyer: So how is this one not going to make me buy a X100, X100S, X-e1. Oh yeah, it's way cheaper? It's not about the money if it was I'd use a pinhole camera.

Canon, I love ya but pleeease fire your R&D staff, someone needs to wake up.

Canon needs a new Marketing Director - they are not in tune with the people - ask Nikon users they had the same problem a few years ago - made a change - and are now doing very well most of the time !
I would love Canon to make a go of it but they are NOT !

Direct link | Posted on Mar 22, 2013 at 04:20 UTC
In reply to:

lightandday: Who wants this - not me !

Excuse the replication above !

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 14:58 UTC
In reply to:

lightandday: Who wants this - not me !

I doubt not many 5D users would want this camera.
Canon should have used their resources in making something like a Nikon D7100 - this camera will be a failure -it's smaller so what ?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 14:37 UTC
In reply to:

lightandday: Who wants this - not me !

I would say not many 5D users would want this camera - the cost of producing this camera would have been more sensibly used in producing something like a Nikon D7100 . This camera will be a failure as it will not satisfy the market demand and very few Canon users will buy it - size - I doubt it !

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 14:29 UTC

Who wants this - not me !

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 08:36 UTC as 79th comment | 5 replies
On DxOMark investigates lenses for the Nikon D800 article (93 comments in total)
In reply to:

lightandday: What credibility has this Company ( DXO ) got ?
i.e. Are Nikkors really that better than Canon EF lenses as demonstrated in their "TEST" results ?
Should I be selling my digital Canon digital camerasand lenses and buying Nikon/Nikkor equipment ?
Are they( DXO ) independent with no financial benefit received for their results and are there any other non commercial "TESTING "organisations that perform and publish their results ?

I thank you for you thoughts - I was really shattered to see how good Nikon is and using Canon for digital and previously using Nikon film equipment (and still do ! ) I wondered about the crediabilty of DXO and was rather hoping that they didn't have any !

Direct link | Posted on Mar 16, 2013 at 03:31 UTC
Total: 77, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »