|
|
huyzer
Lives in
Works as a
Photographer
Joined on
Jun 15, 2005
About me:
View
|
sagebrushfire: Honestly I think it's worse to give someone something that's 60%+ painted and it shows, especially in the picture where the baby's foot mysteriously just cuts off and where the little girl looks like an angry swamp monster. It would be better to just use the picture as a slight reference and make a nice looking painting based off it.
The baby's foot which you state is "cut off", looks to just be hidden by the person's black outfit/body.
:( Poor guy.
harrygilbert: When will this capability come out for the 1D-X?
Yeah, I think they're just erring on the side of caution/no lawsuit.
harrygilbert: When will this capability come out for the 1D-X?
From the conclusion on that article, under "Is hacking legal?", it woiuld seem it'd be okay to touch the 1D series camera.
huyzer: You've done good, Adobe.
- signed, Adobe competitor and alternatives.
Cool, thanks. I took a look.
I hope they come out with Nikon RAW video output. But it looks like they're focused on Canon, and getting that done right, first?
Ya, I'm guessing they can differentiate from winking and blinking.
huyzer: You've done good, Adobe.
- signed, Adobe competitor and alternatives.
Maybe they don't know about it? It'd be interesting to send an email to Corel and see how they respond.
You've done good, Adobe.
- signed, Adobe competitor and alternatives.
Dang it! I had this idea years ago. :( Alas, no money, nor technical know-how to implement it. ...
DPreview, I appreciate all the tests you all do (you're a great resource), so don't get me wrong. But it would have been nice to provide samples in a quiet room, as the main point of the STM seems to be how silent it is. We can't tell with all the background noise in the outdoor scenes you have. Why is this necessary? Well, I imagine new or budget film makers, and perhaps they need to film a quiet scene. Thanks.
bigdaddave: Really nice shot and well lit.
There are two things I would change, I would have had the crust the other way up to see the texture of the bread and I'd clone out the writing on the spoon, but really nice.
I think that would depend on the emphasis of the photo. I reckon that if you turned that cut piece of bread around, the lighter insides would be too light, and thus be sort of a bright distraction, or too much of a screen/scene hog. :)
Interesting.
I love the picture with the kitten.
rattymouse: Incredible that she did not take up the trip to Taiwan. Come on!! Make some time, if not now in the future.
Well, in the news segment, it explains why she decided to, possibly, not make the trip.
ivan1973: Why not just send her the files. Save all the unnecessary resources.
Maybe they (airlines) wanted the publicity.
Congrats on the win. Beautiful colors.
Is this a model, or real jellyfish? The coloring seems like it's post-processed.
Man, he's got nice images. I, almost, can't believe he's sharing them full resolution. More power to him.
The Bad lists: "No physical shutter button" twice. That must mean it's really bad. ;)
This is what I appreciate with kids in poorer countries. They are so creative, and make for themselves fun things, instead of everything handed to them, and then complaining they are bored.
I've seen some toy trains from aluminum soda cans too.
This reminds me of U-point technology used in Nik Software.