M H S: Oh no! Not this again.
The excessive focus on the alleged unsatisfying "shooting experience" is just ridiculous.
First and foremost, the point of the camera is to take good pictures (and videos). Furthermore, one person's "inert" experience is another person's "smooth" experience. Give it a rest DPR.
Very true, although I wouldn't be too upset about it - highlighting subjective crap like that only means that the camera is virtually perfect as they couldn't find worse niggles.
bobbarber: Well, it has an EVF. That's good. I like it compared to other "enthusiast" compact cameras. Not sure if I'll buy it (used, after a year or two), because I find travel zooms more useful in this size class. Travel zooms are slower, but I find that I get a lot more shots because of the zoom than I lose to low light, and I'm satisfied with the IQ. Still, I wish that somebody would make a travel zoom with an EVF!
Panasonic TZ60 might tick many of your boxes - light & pocketable, 24~720 mm equiv. lens, EVF (although a bit crappy), shoots RAW.
tkbslc: All my dpreview ad banners have now switched to ads to buy garbage cans on Amazon since reading this article.
I thought pop-up banners only advertised garbage?
iae aa eia: What a lens! What a sensor-lens integration! What an output! What a camera! A masterpiece. Is the price high? Depends. I don't think it's cheap, but considering the reviews and the lack of direct competition...
Here in the UK the price has dropped from £1079 (RRP) to circa £650 (Hong Kong import, including tax and shipping). Not bad for a camera that ticks so many boxes.
KrisAK: I'd cancel my order for the GH4 in a heartbeat (I'm primarily interested in video), except:
-- No high-bitrate recording options for 60p (or anything else internally)-- The 29-minute runtime limit
Sony, the GH4 ships in about a month, so you've got approximately 4 weeks to come up with a firmware fix. You know where I can be reached.
As far as I know the latter has nothing to do with the company's inability or unwillingness to 'give' you a full-length video feature. It simply categorises products into different tax bands - a device which shoots 29 mins 59 sec (or less) video is classed as a still image camera and falls into a cheaper tax band; anything capable of 30+ mins is a video camera to which a hefty taxation applies.
I suppose it would make sense to produce 2 versions of the RX10, seeing how popular it could be among videographers.
Kivivuori: Some interesting models/prototypes...
The rest: nothing positive to say. Ugly, low-level design.... :(
I would assume that the price point will be adequately low.
Just Ed: So does a "smart lens" evaluate your subjects to see if they are just to ugly to photograph???
It might just take the photo, but watermark it with tactful reminders "You should have had your beauty sleep" or "Make an immediate appointment at hairdressers".
That gold rim on the lens alone reassures me of its top quality.
I am no expert, but some entries seem like a regular production units, albeit very pretty ones.
Unless one would include classic car restoration into (wider definition of) tuning?
AndreSJ: Apparently 3 people have already had this camera and got rid of it hahahahahaha
I don't want to troll, but I really hate the grip on my 5D Mark VI.
lacix: News media purposely misinterpret the law! Its not like that at all!The European left liberal media ganged up with the Hungarian left against the current government! “the freedom of the press" crap again!.. Continuously going on since the last four years! Shame on them! Why they do that? It’s election time in April 6, Ron Werber guiding the left opposition!
Speaking of wealthy elite afraid of the free press - how is the Orban family doing these days?
Ákos Stiller, Márton Magócsi, Eszter Bognár, László Székely
The above is the list of concerned individuals cited in the Guardian article. Is anyone on that list a communist billionaire?
Just so the others can comprehend:
??? = Considering how saturated the ILC marketplace has become, what is the point in introducing yet another camera system?
Also, I would be interested to hear your explanation with regard to the World Press Freedom index(es) - during Orban's reign, Hungary has dropped from 25th (2009) to 64th (2014) place, and it has been ranked as high as 10th during Ferenc Gyurcsany's quasi-socialist government in 2006.
Any thoughts on that?
Freedom to publish concerns of those who are worried that a) Hungary is becoming a police state, b) restricting press goes hand-in-hand with political corruption, c) vague laws can erode civil liberties.
Red G8R: There are always extreme cases where laws are needed protect the public such as preventing the paparazzi from hounding someone.
I have not read a single comment of yours which would constructively critique (what seems to be) a general consensus on this forum. Instead you keep resorting to personal attacks and dismissing free press on the grounds of some liberal conspiracy. While I get the impression you are a smart individual, these actions don't do you any justice.
That being said, I would like to read your explanation with regard to the World Press Freedom index(es) - during Orban's reign, Hungary has dropped from 25th (2009) to 64th (2014) place, and it has been ranked as high as 10th during Ferenc Gyurcsany's quasi-socialist government in 2006.
P.S. I don't live in Hungary, so you're safe.
Pantyhose Bandit: Oh... The Guardina - the company that can't even spell its own name right. What a bastion of journalistic integrity. I wouldn't trust anything the guardian scrawled on its pages.
I have read few issues of Neues Volk, but somehow they failed to augment my political persuasion.
@ Dave Oddie
To be fair, the pre-election Cleggy was quite irresistible. To this day I only wear orange tie with indigo suit.
role_of_72: I'm a Hungarian amateur photographer living in the capital, Budapest.I read about the law recently but it would not change my photography habits.
In a nutshell: I'm quite convinced that this has nothing to do with the kind of photography we do.
[OFF] In a bit more detail: It is all about protecting the members of the ruling party and their buddies to have a chance to destroy any evidence of their messy affairs (they've been doing this for four years now).They had already restricted the freedom of the press, the Parliament, Constitutional Court and so on.This law was introduced on 15th March, one of our biggest national Days when political demonstrations likely to happen. Coincidence? Neh. [/OFF]
All in all I think you shouldn't cancel your visit because of this law but I can clearly understand if you do so.
Harmless idiot to be more precise.
Thanks for the text, but the Google translation made it even more vague than it actually is. I would appreciate if you could properly translate the most debatable paragraph(s) of the law for me. No rush, it's pretty late anyway.
Funduro: Is Putin writing the laws in Hungary ?
Interesting point, but wouldn't you concur that:
1. Lawlessness is a temporary state which (in most cases) is abused by the most powerful minority which turns it into a totalitarian leadership?
2. Most laws are inherently totalitarian as they're imposed on us by the ruling elite, without an actual consultation (=mandate) prior to their implementation?