ThatCamFan: Sadly when I used to be a pentax user this would excite me, but sadly they are TEN YEARS to late.
Cane, you can disappear from here to practice yourself what you just said ;-)
Besides, it is not Pentax any more. It is Richo.After 5 years later, it may be Shaomi.
I always bragged about the quality of the result from my iPhone 6Plus, and one day, my younger brother took a picture of her daughter in a boat at night (it was a family gathering) with his G4. The portrait picture from the G4 really blowed my mind. I wish I could share it here...
What is POV ? which means I don't need it...
Wow Great~! Dead mosquitos and beetles too :-)
Canon, I will buy 15-85mm F2.8-4.0 if it is under $1,200(and if the image quality is as good as the original one).
nikkornikon: Wow...DP is going to review a Leica? What's Wrong with DP.
It's only a "Imression" review. The real review will be on Apr 1, next year ;-)
I am waiting for Sony RX1 II at half the price of this....
arndsan: wow - very expansive but finally a attractive camera next to the M.wonder how 28mm and 1,7 work in regard to DoF and if we get 1:6000 wide open with the leaf shutter. It's frustrating to have only 1:1000 wide open using the Fuji X100s.
I think that the price is right, though...
Papi61: Some people have waaaaaaay too much time on their hands... I wonder if there's an award for the Greatest Photographic Exercise in Futility... Definitely it would be a toss between this one and the Mont Blanc panorama a few days ago.
And what should we call this "masterpiece"? Maybe "triumph of narcissism?"
I thought the golf in the same way. People have just too much time and money to waste, and they spend their entire lives just to push the ball into the holes using super expensive sticks all day long. And they say, it's fun!
intruder61: More soccer mum cameras, and there's nothing wrong with that.
They are busy watching NBA and drinking beers ;-)
This is a good progression. Nice work Sony !I expect that this kind of camera will be eventually smaller - thinner (but screen larger) and be integrated with smartphone features (ex Android equipped) so that you can use variety of photo editing tools and share photos using SNS apps. Samsung already did this, but camera features/performance is so and so. Sony is progressing from the other direction - camera first. The only problem is that nowadays the people who use this kind of P&S cameras really don't take pictures if they don't post on Facebook or Instagram. And they are not the tech-savvy people who can use wifi features to move the pictures to smartphones and then post on SNS. If they can, they are not the level of photographers who use this kind of P&S cameras. So, I guess, it's a wrong marketing but it's in progress to a better direction.
But these days, even soccer moms use DSLR.Or just smart phones...
nerd2: We already have unlimited google plus that is integrated with picasa.
No, it is not unlimited. it's only 15G. Besides, it's really confusing to use as a cloud drive. It meant to be used for google+ blogging/sns.
I uploaded a jpeg picture of 12 Mbytes size to Amazon cloud (I exported from LightRoom with 100% jpeg quality, since I was going to print it out on a poster size paper). But the uploaded picture size became only 3 Mbytes, and yet the pixel resolution remains the same. It looks like when uploading the picture, Amazon cloud diminishes the quality of the jpeg. Disappointed.
tinternaut: A very nice, varied set. Wondering if the photographer got special permission to bring his big lenses into North Korea (I hear they're funny about anything over 150mm).
If Kim Jung Eun sees the picture, she's going to be shot (anyway, she agreed to be shot).
ttran88: Lots of praises here and I'm sure the camera is great but with a company like Samsung and its rich history of "astroturfing", which praises are real?
And as recent as last week..
I find this company to be extremely unethical and I personally wouldn't want to support this behavior with my money.
In S. Korea, most Koreans "hate" Samsung. But oddly enough, they end up buying Samsung products. Because for the money that's what they can do best... It's like many people hated MicroSoft, but they ended up with Windows desktop in their home and office (at least a decade ago, maybe still now)...
Thank you for the excellent reviews. They were very informative. But next time you should also test the IQ of the heads... ;-)
Just wondering why it has to be high ISO with high shutter speed... Could it be iso 400 with shutter speed 200 for better picture ? Or could high ISO test something on the lens?